compatibility F-14 and Kuznetsov

[Logan54]

and if u look this video with Tomcat, seems to me that this collision also because Tomcat=/=Su-33, Tomcat go through wheel stoppers as Su-27, and broked wheels after its gone them, no any visualization if wheel mechanics was damaged during, so its not a collision, but also I see some stop effect there, really strange

https://youtu.be/DVjWXAJNBNA

Edited August 26, 2022 by Logan54

[draconus]

56 minutes ago, Logan54 said:

and if u look this video with Tomcat, seems to me that this collision also because Tomcat=/=Su-33, Tomcat go through wheel stoppers as Su-27, and broked wheels after its gone them, no any visualization if wheel mechanics was damaged during, so its not a collision, but also I see some stop effect there, really strange

https://youtu.be/DVjWXAJNBNA

I'd support the case, as I am proponent of proper physics in simulator, not blind follower of history, but it's clear at 0:22 that the elements of the landing gear should be damaged. All what happens after this is just wrong but I doubt anything will be done to make it behave better simply because of feasibility vs edge case. Same as Su-33 blowing up when taxi through elevators on SC. Both should be fixed some day imho as some non-priority cleaning job just for the sake of better simulation.

[Logan54]

10 минут назад, draconus сказал:

I'd support the case, as I am proponent of proper physics in simulator, not blind follower of history, but it's clear at 0:22 that the elements of the landing gear should be damaged. All what happens after this is just wrong but I doubt anything will be done to make it behave better simply because of feasibility vs edge case. Same as Su-33 blowing up when taxi through elevators on SC. Both should be fixed some day imho as some non-priority cleaning job just for the sake of better simulation.

It seems to me that ED must work just a bit harder with Kuz because it hasn`t any command on board and its 3D model not so cool as US Forrestal, also similar ATC phaseology

[felixx75]

I still don't understand the discussion here. Why would you want to launch a su-27 from a carrier. I'm not trying to take off from a carrier with an F-35A either...

 

Edited August 26, 2022 by felixx75

[Mr_sukebe]

What are the people in this thread smoking?

 

Maybe more relevant, is it available to the rest of us?

[Logan54]

17 минут назад, felixx75 сказал:

I still don't understand the discussion here. Why would you want to launch a su-27 from a carrier. I'm not trying to take off from a carrier with an F-35A either...

not try before and not to have a chance its different things, or not?

13 минут назад, Mr_sukebe сказал:

What are the people in this thread smoking?

CATOBAR

14 минут назад, Mr_sukebe сказал:

Maybe more relevant, is it available to the rest of us?

U need to ask them in private messages

Edited August 26, 2022 by Logan54

[MAXsenna]

44 minutes ago, Logan54 said:

CATOBAR

U need to ask them in private messages

 

Now you're actually being fun! Thanks!  

[Frosty2124]

The idiocy and ignorance from OP in this post is leading me to believe they are trolling, they just wont take "it isn't designed this way" as the bottom line truth.....

[Zeagle]

On 8/25/2022 at 7:10 AM, Swordsman422 said:

Catapult Assisted Take-Off But Arrested Recovery. Meaning the F-14 requires a catapult system to launch off the deck and must recover with arresting cables. Kuznetsov is a STOBAR, or Short Take-Off But Arrested Recovery carrier.

It's not a bug. Just the compatibility hasn't been developed, and I wouldn't hold your breath. You're as likely to get CATOBAR-compatible Su-33s as a STOBAR F-14 or F/A-18. The real jets weren't cross-compatible.

 

That has to be one of the all-time worst acronyms ever created...it's bad even by government standards

 

[Naquaii]

I can understand the willingness to experiment and try unrealistic things but the simple answer is that putting time and effort into making the F-14 work with the Kuznetsov is just not high on the list as it's completely unrealistic.

[SkateZilla]

4 hours ago, Logan54 said:

checked right now TO Su-27 from Kuz, also broken wheels, its a ED code, and no knowledge about STOBAR So finaly I can say that Kuz working only with Su-33

https://youtu.be/vbD1AjgAcpI

 

Again, The Aircraft is not Coded to use STOBAR.

Su-27 is not a SU-33

The Su-27 Code has it as a land based aircraft and no carrier ClassId's

It's not ED's code, the code is fine.

The Su-33 is the only Aircraft in DCS that uses the STOBAR Code.

While you're at it, and wanna play the blame ED Game, put a cow from the WWII Pack on the Kunetzov and see what happens.

It's not a bug, you are doing things that aren't supposed to be done.

Edited August 26, 2022 by SkateZilla

[Frosty2124]

38 minutes ago, SkateZilla said:

 put a cow from the WWII Pack on the Kunetzov and see what happens.

 

 

I MUST KNOW

[Logan54]

1 час назад, SkateZilla сказал:

put a cow from the WWII Pack on the Kunetzov and see what happens.

they feel good)

 

Edited August 26, 2022 by Logan54

[lunaticfringe]

Screw that. I want to put a cow on Forrestal CAT 2 set as "takeoff from ramp". 

 

[BIGNEWY]

 

The question has been answered, lets not turn this into trolling. 

thanks