Any news on the Mirage F1M?

[Ornithopter]

Quote

Like this one, from 4 months ago?

4 months is apparently a short period of time from your perspective.  That's fine.  You aren't everyone.  Ostensibly, we all paid for the Mirage, enjoy the Mirage enough to remain interested, and are wondering when the module is going to be complete.  Perhaps the developers are so busy that even the 20 seconds it takes to say 'Hi' on the forum is just too much.

Edited October 5 by Ornithopter

[SeanTopperHarley69]

6 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

I find a bit funny at how many users seem to need development updates, like if they were supervisors or shareholders of the Company… On my case I don’t expect to be informed, just as I don’t expect a carmaker or a planemaker to keep me informed on their development advances. Why don’t we spend our time flying the three variants of the F1 we already have, rather than worrying about the M?

Why don't you allow others to ask whatever they like? You are always acting like a meta moderator telling others what is good or bad to ask and how much you enjoy the wonders of SP. Go enjoy your little world and let others ask, it won't kill you man.......

[MAXsenna]

3 hours ago, Ornithopter said:

4 months is apparently a short period of time from your perspective.  That's fine.  You aren't everyone.  Ostensibly, we all paid for the Mirage, enjoy the Mirage enough to remain interested, and are wondering when the module is going to be complete.  Perhaps the developers are so busy that even the 20 seconds it takes to say 'Hi' on the forum is just too much.

Well, they posted today, about getting the F-1 and C-101 for free if you purchase a  Pimax. So there's that.
I'm a sucker for news and updates myself and but I've learned that in DCS we will get news when the news is ready. Stopped pulling my hair out a while back.  

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

[Rudel_chw]

3 hours ago, SeanTopperHarley69 said:

Why don't you allow others to ask whatever they like?
 

 

Wasn't aware that I had the power to block others from asking … can’t I find the need for constant developer news a bit funny?

 

3 hours ago, SeanTopperHarley69 said:

You are always acting like a meta moderator telling others what is good or bad to ask and how much you enjoy the wonders of SP.

 

i’m no moderator, you are welcome to add me to your ignore list.

 

3 hours ago, SeanTopperHarley69 said:

Go enjoy your little world and let others ask, it won't kill you man.......

again, wasn’t aware that I had the power to preclude others from asking, go ahead and ask the developers some more 

[MAXsenna]

5 minutes ago, Rudel_chw said:

an’t I find the need for constant developer news a bit funny?

Funny? Tiresome is more like it.  

[EricToGo]

In my opinion it is much more tiresome to have people again and again tell people that asking for news is useless and "it will come when it will come". This is a thread that in the title says it is about asking for news regarding the F1M and thus people do so. Everyone is entitled to their opinion of course, but to willingly click on a thread about asking for news again and again just to tell people not to is questionable.

To add to the topic:
There can be a happy medium between having to receive weekly updates on everything and being ghosted on any progress for months at a time. Doesn't need to be finished things either. Just tell whatever currently is being worked on every few weeks or so. An update does not need to be ED newsletter length every time either. 

[Ornithopter]

2 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

 

 … can’t I find the need for constant developer news a bit funny?

Funny?  You mean funny like a clown?  This amuses you?   We make you laugh and we're here just to amuse you?  What do you mean by funny? Funny how?

[Dekillos]

The request for news about the F1M not only concerns the appearance of a new version of the Mirage, but also when we will finally get the implemented radar on the CE EE versions

[MAXsenna]

The request for news about the F1M not only concerns the appearance of a new version of the Mirage, but also when we will finally get the implemented radar on the CE EE versions

And this is probably why we don't get any news. It takes longer than anticipated and they have nothing to show.
Of course I personally would've posted a: "we're working on it, still. Just takes time!", every week just to satisfy y'all.

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

[kenlip]

6 hours ago, MAXsenna said:

Funny? Tiresome is more like it.  

People asking for news about the F1M in a forum thread that asks for news about the F1M???

The horror!

 

[kenlip]

17 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

I find a bit funny at how many users seem to need development updates, like if they were supervisors or shareholders of the Company… On my case I don’t expect to be informed, just as I don’t expect a carmaker or a planemaker to keep me informed on their development advances. Why don’t we spend our time flying the three variants of the F1 we already have, rather than worrying about the M?

I have indeed enjoyed the first 3 variants and Aerges should be proud of the work they have put in.  

That said, when we are dealing with a project that has no timelines and they already have our money, it makes sense to ask the devs to stay accountable.  

How long would it honestly take to slap some WiP screenshots in a forum post every 6 months? 

I'm sure you are a nice fellow, and I too enjoyed the single player content you put out.  

It's ok that we don't see eye to eye on this matter though. 

Edited October 6 by kenlip

[MAXsenna]

3 hours ago, kenlip said:

People asking for news about the F1M in a forum thread that asks for news about the F1M???
The horror!
 

Nah, it's just the way basically ED and every other day 3rd party operates. I've just gotten used to it. Most of the teams doesn't do it for a living.

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
 

3 hours ago, kenlip said:

How long would it honestly take to slap some WiP screenshots in a forum post every 6 months? 

We did get that a while back, didn't we? Sure post some more! I guess what we all would like to see is the new radar.  

Edited October 6 by MAXsenna
spelling, grammar, and punctuation

[kenlip]

1 hour ago, MAXsenna said:

Nah, it's just the way basically ED and every other day 3rd party operates. I've just gotten used to it. Most of the teams doesn't do it for a living.

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
 

We did get that a while back. Didn't we? Sure post some more. I guess what we al would like to see is the new radar.  

True, I would prefer to see real radar progress more than the F1M as well.

[MAXsenna]

1 hour ago, kenlip said:

True, I would prefer to see real radar progress more than the F1M as well.

Agree!  

[SeanTopperHarley69]

10 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

 

Wasn't aware that I had the power to block others from asking … can’t I find the need for constant developer news a bit funny?

 

 

i’m no moderator, you are welcome to add me to your ignore list.

 

again, wasn’t aware that I had the power to preclude others from asking, go ahead and ask the developers some more 

Don’t come here now acting all innocent like you have no idea what I’m talking about. You’re always the first to demand no one asks questions or offers criticism that you don't like, yet you’re the one who continuously injects condescending, pointless remarks into others’ discussions without adding a single ounce of value. And then, after you’ve sabotaged the conversation, you add the original poster to your massive ignore list, completely dodging the real issue. It’s almost laughable how predictable you are—guaranteed, you’ll probably do the same with me, right?

[Rudel_chw]

2 hours ago, SeanTopperHarley69 said:

you’re the one who continuously injects condescending, pointless remarks into others’ discussions without adding a single ounce of value.

where were you when the barrage of "+1" posts came along?

 

2 hours ago, SeanTopperHarley69 said:

And then, after you’ve sabotaged the conversation,

 

so, everyone can post their opinion, but if I do then it’s not an opinion but "sabotage"  ?

 

2 hours ago, SeanTopperHarley69 said:

you add the original poster to your massive ignore list, completely dodging the real issue. It’s almost laughable how predictable you are—guaranteed, you’ll probably do the same with me, right?

I only do that with people who are rude or insulting, not sure about you yet. 

[Esac_mirmidon]

Drama on this forum.

A classic.....

PD. Yes, is a bit funny.... All this drama 

Aerges, you better post something or this will go nuts very quick.

Edited October 6 by Esac_mirmidon

[BIGNEWY]

folks be nice to each other.

[kotor633]

Hi,

The world as we know it is about to collapse. Still no F1M. We don't already have enough modules...to keep us happy. Let Aerges mess around, they'll get in touch as soon as they have something to show. The F1BE & EE are very good examples. By the way: How long have we been waiting for the F-14 95 early & Iran version? We haven't heard anything from Aviastorm regarding the Tornado here in the forum either. The Bo-105 has been in development for how long (10 years)? Etc. It is what it is. As the motto in DCS is: Be patient. Aerges has done a great job so far & they will do the same with the F1M. I have the module myself. And I hope the F1M will be released soon. But it will take some time. For now, enjoy what's currently available in DCS.

[SeanTopperHarley69]

5 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

where were you when the barrage of "+1" posts came along?

 

 

so, everyone can post their opinion, but if I do then it’s not an opinion but "sabotage"  ?

 

I only do that with people who are rude or insulting, not sure about you yet. 

Look at the "+1" in this post.... Bye!!!!

[Ornithopter]

14 hours ago, MAXsenna said:

And this is probably why we don't get any news. It takes longer than anticipated and they have nothing to show.
Of course I personally would've posted a: "we're working on it, still. Just takes time!", every week just to satisfy y'all.

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
 

 

Well, of course you would have, because that is the courteous thing to do, and you're probably a polite guy. The +1 stuff earlier, and the back and forth that followed would have alerted you to the fact that some people are getting annoyed.  And then you would come on to the forum and say, Hi guys, sorry for the lack of news, but we've been busy working on X,Y,and Z.  That seems like common sense, because a few sentences would probably cause this topic to go dormant again, or at least cancel some of the negativity.  And yet, they've let it drag on with nary a word, to the point that the ED moderators are now taking notice and telling people to dial it back. Why aren't they addressing the commotion themselves? I too approached this thread with the attitude that people were being a little too demanding, and that they just need to shut up and quit pestering the developers, but as I've seen the thread play out, with no logical response, I've changed my mind. To me, something seems a little off.  Hope I'm wrong.

 

 

Edited October 6 by Ornithopter

[MAXsenna]

@Ornithopter

Fair enough!  

I actually re-read the whole thread and it got me thinking. I know I bring up the radar a lot, and they even address it in one of the posts. I have a feeling they will use the "same" radar model in the F-104, which makes perfectly sense. And they might have started on the F-104 in parallel, which could be a reason for the "delays". 

Cheers! 

[Loukuins]

16 minutes ago, MAXsenna said:

@Ornithopter

Fair enough!  

I actually re-read the whole thread and it got me thinking. I know I bring up the radar a lot, and they even address it in one of the posts. I have a feeling they will use the "same" radar model in the F-104, which makes perfectly sense. And they might have started on the F-104 in parallel, which could be a reason for the "delays". 

Cheers! 

They already stated that they are working on the F-104 in parallel of the F1M and Radar Overall. They are a small team and they are increasing the quality of their current and future product. Let's be patient and wait for a good module. I'm pretty sure they are eager to share news aswell. 
"Let Them Cook"

[Silver_Dragon]

2 hours ago, Ornithopter said:

 

Well, of course you would have, because that is the courteous thing to do, and you're probably a polite guy. The +1 stuff earlier, and the back and forth that followed would have alerted you to the fact that some people are getting annoyed.  And then you would come on to the forum and say, Hi guys, sorry for the lack of news, but we've been busy working on X,Y,and Z.  That seems like common sense, because a few sentences would probably cause this topic to go dormant again, or at least cancel some of the negativity.  And yet, they've let it drag on with nary a word, to the point that the ED moderators are now taking notice and telling people to dial it back. Why aren't they addressing the commotion themselves? I too approached this thread with the attitude that people were being a little too demanding, and that they just need to shut up and quit pestering the developers, but as I've seen the thread play out, with no logical response, I've changed my mind. To me, something seems a little off.  Hope I'm wrong.

 

 

Does anyone get upset when a third party posts a story from August 22nd?

Quote

As for the much-anticipated F1M and F-104, our team is working intensively on their development, and we will share further updates in future posts.

 

[Ornithopter]

2 hours ago, Silver_Dragon said:

Does anyone get upset when a third party posts a story from August 22nd?

 

 

Are you serious?  No, after seeing their lack of response to recent customer comments in this thread, your quote doesn't mean anything to me now.   As I've been reading this thread over the past several days, I frequently saw the names of some of the official Aerges people at the bottom of the screen, concurrently reading the thread.  And THAT actually annoyed me, especially since people were starting to get nasty with each other.  If the sentence you've cherry picked from an obscure video about a VR headset is still applicable, then obviously one of the officials reading this topic could have re-asserted it right here and right now.  Why didn't they?