Pribs86 Posted Friday at 08:22 PM Posted Friday at 08:22 PM Thank you guys! That is all. Have a great day! 9
saburo_cz Posted Friday at 08:30 PM Posted Friday at 08:30 PM DCS A6M5, Dreams come true! 7 A6M5 | F6F P-51D | P-47D | F4U-1D | Mosquito FB Mk VI | Spitfire | Fw 190D | Fw 190A | Bf 109K | WWII Assets Pack Normandy 2 | The Channel | Sinai | Syria | PG | NTTR | South Atlantic F-4E | F-14A/B | F/A-18 | F-86 | F-16C | A-10C | FC-3 | CA | SC |
Wizard_03 Posted Friday at 08:36 PM Posted Friday at 08:36 PM What a welcome surprise!! Such an Iconic warbird! 7 DCS F/A-18C :sorcerer:
Reverend Posted Saturday at 03:10 AM Posted Saturday at 03:10 AM (edited) Oh, I'm pleasantly surprised. Good thing. Edited Saturday at 03:13 AM by Reverend 3
LeCuvier Posted Saturday at 08:01 AM Posted Saturday at 08:01 AM I cannot find any announcement about the zero fighter. What info have you seen about it? LeCuvier Windows 10 Pro 64Bit | i7-4790 CPU |16 GB RAM|SSD System Disk|SSD Gaming Disk| MSI GTX-1080 Gaming 8 GB| Acer XB270HU | TM Warthog HOTAS | VKB Gladiator Pro | MongoosT-50 | MFG Crosswind Pedals | TrackIR 5
MAXsenna Posted Saturday at 08:06 AM Posted Saturday at 08:06 AM 4 minutes ago, LeCuvier said: I cannot find any announcement about the zero fighter. What info have you seen about it? Yesterday's Newsletter. 2
Pikey Posted Saturday at 10:02 AM Posted Saturday at 10:02 AM Although not explicitly stated in the news letter, we can infer from the forum position that this will be EDs module. That's important when looking at development time and features, what's coming is fairly predictable. 1 ___________________________________________________________________________ SIMPLE SCENERY SAVING * SIMPLE GROUP SAVING * SIMPLE STATIC SAVING *
MAXsenna Posted Saturday at 10:53 AM Posted Saturday at 10:53 AM Although not explicitly stated in the news letter, we can infer from the forum position that this will be EDs module. That's important when looking at development time and features, what's coming is fairly predictable.Not just assume, they have confirmed it. And, they kind of said they would do it sometime a year or so ago, just not when. So it was always pretty obvious it was always going to be an ED module. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk 4
Darkline Posted Saturday at 07:47 PM Posted Saturday at 07:47 PM 1 hour ago, dcn said: A6M5b?It's A6M5c Wait who said it was a B? 1
Art-J Posted Saturday at 08:24 PM Posted Saturday at 08:24 PM 34 minutes ago, Darkline said: Wait who said it was a B? The name of this very forum section did :D. But indeed, WIP shot seen above clearly shows extra 13.2 mm guns which shouldn't be there on b variant. 2 i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10.
mazex Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) Really nice to get the Zero - but for the late war scenarions and opponents, wouldn't a Ki-84 be more interesting? No one will dare dogfight the Zero and it is too slow to catch up with anyone that understands that? Edited 9 hours ago by mazex 1 Ryzen 9800X3D | RTX 5080 GPU | Gigabyte X670 Aorus Elite AX MB | 64GB 6000Mhz DDR5 | Windows 11 Pro x64 | Virpil T-50 Throttle | T50 CM2 Grip + WarBRD | VKB T-rudder MK IV | Asus PG279Q 1440p | Pimax Crystal Light VR | Samsung 980 Pro as system disk and DCS on separate Samsung 990 Pro NVME SSD
DD_Fenrir Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, mazex said: Really nice to get the Zero - but for the late war scenarions and opponents, wouldn't a Ki-84 be more interesting? No one will dare dogfight the Zero and it is too slow to catch up with anyone that understands that? The A6M5 was not far the most numerous of the late war fighter Japanese naval fighter types and thus represents the most likely you would encounter. The other issue with modelling a Frank is trying to find reliable data, and establishing how much of that performance was lost in build quality (pretty poor by that stage) and in reliability. A well built, carefully maintained Ki-84 would have indeed been a formidable opponent but in late 44/early 45 by all accounts they were rarely at their best in either category and their performance suffered accordingly. 1
Gunfreak Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, mazex said: Really nice to get the Zero - but for the late war scenarions and opponents, wouldn't a Ki-84 be more interesting? No one will dare dogfight the Zero and it is too slow to catch up with anyone that understands that? For one, there wasn't a single Ki-84 involved in the battles in the Marianas. Which is what ED has decided to be their PTO experience. Sure there was just a few months between Saipan and Lyte gulf. But that's when the Ki-84 was first used. 1 i7 13700k @5.2ghz, GTX 5090 OC, 128Gig ram 4800mhz DDR5, M2 drive.
dcn Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 4小时前,mazex说: Really nice to get the Zero - but for the late war scenarions and opponents, wouldn't a Ki-84 be more interesting? No one will dare dogfight the Zero and it is too slow to catch up with anyone that understands that? Yeah I prefer J2M but M3 choce to make A6M5 then maybe ED took over it.And Zero can land on carrier.But anyway,I think DCS is a study sim not a game that focus on MP.I want Ki-84 too but as they have chose Zero we have to wait for years to see the opportunity.
jeventy26 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 4 hours ago, mazex said: Really nice to get the Zero - but for the late war scenarions and opponents, wouldn't a Ki-84 be more interesting? No one will dare dogfight the Zero and it is too slow to catch up with anyone that understands that? OK, I guess my Vals and Judy's will not have to worry about anything as I escort them on the way to deal death to the Enterprise lol We are home free boys!
Gunfreak Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Also the exact same problem can be said about the Spitfire vs the D9 and K4. In theory a Spitfire should never win against those two in DCS. As long as they never get involved in a turn fight. Yet we known the Spitfire shoots them down plenty in DCS. Same for the Zero vs F4U and F6F. i7 13700k @5.2ghz, GTX 5090 OC, 128Gig ram 4800mhz DDR5, M2 drive.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now