Do you think it will be released 2010? Yes or no.

[Speed]

when BOB Storm of War come our LOL

 

World War II planes SUCK. I want LGBs, guided missiles, and the like. I love playing with systems, dodging SAMs, etc. World War II is just... boring. And slow. And WAY WAY OVERDONE.

[sungsam]

Who cares about release time period ? Most of us already bought DCS A10C and already receiving playable BETAs. It's transparent to us all, if ED will decide to continue to BETA 4,5,6,7,8,9 or officialy release an acceptable version, and afterward publish patches v 1,2,3,4,5 :)

Edited December 9, 2010 by sungsam

[element1108]

World War II planes SUCK. I want LGBs, guided missiles, and the like. I love playing with systems, dodging SAMs, etc. World War II is just... boring. And slow. And WAY WAY OVERDONE.

 

Hey man easy there. WWII planes do NOT suck :joystick:

 

You wanting LGB's and the likes is great, I want that as well, but please NOT to the expense of WWII aviation. A fully simulated WWII sim hasn't yet been done to the level or Rise of Flight or DCS/Falcon. Getting within 200 yards of a plane moving 300 mph with 30-40 other planes in the melee IS VERY exciting. :pilotfly:

Edited December 9, 2010 by element1108

[Mirtma]

Hey man easy there. WWII planes do NOT suck :joystick:

Getting within 200 yards of a plane moving 300 mph with 30-40 other planes in the melee IS VERY exciting. :pilotfly:

 

Agree! :pilotfly:

[Steel Jaw]

World War II planes SUCK. I want LGBs, guided missiles, and the like. I love playing with systems, dodging SAMs, etc. World War II is just... boring. And slow. And WAY WAY OVERDONE.

 

True dat. well put. Brutal and to the point. :thumbup:

[Steel Jaw]

WWII planes do NOT suck

 

Yes they do. :P

 

I should know I have all the hardcore ones.

[Para_Bellum]

The true flightsim fan enjoys all kinds of aircraft, from a Fokker Eindecker to an F-22.

 

:pilotfly:

[159th_Viper]

I'll line ya'all up at the receiving end of a Stuka and then we can figure out who sux.......:D

 

Seafire FTW!

[SNAFU]

Jepp, until we will see the FW190A4 in SoW the WWII planes really suck, especially the Supermarines. :megalol:

 

But the Emil and Hawker Hurricane I has style, thats for sure. :joystick:

 

BTW did I mention that guided weapons are for pussies? :pilotfly: :music_whistling:

 

Anyway, what was the topic? Ah, no, neither of the two mentioned will be released this year, said Paul...

[Scarecrow]

TB-3 with anti-grav pencil FTW!

[slimakwielki]

Nope, there's no way to have A10C released by 2010. I don't want uncompleted, not stable, buggy product...

 

Just release BETA 4 by that time please! Beta 3 is way non stable on my PC letting me play barely few missions without CTD, not to mention TGP/MAV useless due to buggy haze/fog. I would go back Beta 2 but first and foremost is to get familiar with new Flight Model so I would rather avoid collecting bad habits/feeling...

[skouras]

for the people who loves WW2 birds check this out..... http://fooblog.mexxoft.com/category/computerspiele/storm-of-war-computerspiele/screenshots/

[Sticky]

Wags posted today in this thread (http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=63232 page 3 I think) about something else, but confirming that the next update will be a beta update and not RC. That gives almost no time left after that. Practically a confirmation what most of us here already believe.

[Sticky]

World War II planes SUCK.

 

No.

 

And WAY WAY OVERDONE.

 

No.

[Geskes]

Saying WWII aviation sucks is denying your history, it is an insult to the heroes that have come before us and paved the way for us brutal hawg drivers.

 

These guys had some real balls, no fancy avionics, no air conditioning, no zero-zero ejection seat, no search and rescue, only getting the most out of your aircraft, fighting equal opponents in pure raw aviation carnage.

[MTFDarkEagle]

Sticky, Geskes --> AGREED!!!!!!!!

[egorter]

+1 to Geskes

 

except one thing during the BoB they did have S&R and they frequently exchanged pilots from said rescues

[Laud]

In the end it's a matter of taste and interest, so it's pretty pointless to discuss WWII vs. Present-Day-AC...

[galagamo]

In the end it's a matter of taste and interest

True with the women as well. Of course I like my women like I like my aircraft....High, heavy, and bitchin like Betty.

BOT

I guess we could consider the beta as a release:noexpression: Kind of anticlimactic though.

Edited December 9, 2010 by galagamo

[DocSigma]

Honestly, the beta doesn't even feel like a beta. I've seen more release versions of software with more bugs than the current beta. I'd rather see this masterpiece tested ad nausea um until it's right.

[swift]

 

:thumbsup:

[joey45]

^^^ want that one.. ^^^

[Moa]

I voted "no".

 

I think the huge number of no votes is not a statement of any lack of confidence in ED, merely a reflection of the current state of the A-10C Beta and an understanding that work remains.

 

If anything, I hope it shows ED that the community knows it will take time to shake the remaining bugs out and get everything up to commercial production quality.

 

In this sense, I consider the Open Beta has been a huge success in (mostly) getting everybody's expectations aligned - and placating the impatient. Despite the huge PITA it must be for ED and the Tester volunteers, I'd say that this process ought to be repeated for the next in the DCS line (plus, it injects some extra income into ED from the enthusiasts and 'early adopters' while they work on finishing the product).

[hassata]

I predict Beta 4 in the next few days, and barring any show-stoppers, a Dec. 29th release. And trust me, that'll be a bigger present to the ED programmers than us. First time I'm not sh*tting myself waiting for a release, though, thanks to the beta.

[Avilator]

 

:thumbsup:

 

:thumbup::yes:

All that's missing is the TMWH HOTAS.