Flaming Cliffs 3

[GGTharos]

I don't know, you seemed to be suggesting that ED drop the requirement for military contracts because they can find all they got out of it from public sources anyway :P

 

You are correct. I did not dispute that it is much better to have a contract to help make a high quality sim such as DCS. I only said not all information on airframes and components on front line aircraft will be allowed to be released to the public. Is this not what you are saying also. Oh hell the one liners are better anyway, keep em coming.:megalol:

[EtherealN]

I have an errant mole on the green across from my home. Judging from the size of the mole-hills I'm pretty sure that duster might struggle :megalol:

 

Well, you can deliver JDAM with it as well if that would help. :P

[rattler]

I don't know, you seemed to be suggesting that ED drop the requirement for military contracts because they can find all they got out of it from public sources anyway :P

 

 

Well I did say that they could find information on airframes and components without having a military contract. It just won't be aircraft such as the f15e,f18e etc. but earlier versions like maybe f4 phantom etc. not just public sources but from the aircraft manufacturer as well for earlier models no longer front line aircraft. Maybe a biplane or 2 also. Oh ya, il series sorry.lol:P

Edited June 6, 2011 by rattler

[159th_Viper]

Well, you can deliver JDAM with it as well if that would help. :P

 

What!

 

And irritate the mole?

 

Noooo.......

[Laud]

The OTs are the most fun parts of this thread! :D

[digitaljjd]

Hey EtherealN, you forgot four of the other more important optional accessories.

 

 

[EtherealN]

The OTs are the most fun parts of this thread! :D

 

If I didn't consider the thread to be technically without a "T" I'd have closed it long ago. :P

[muamshai]

didn't know that Airforce is interested to protect their....weeding assets.

[manfrez01]

Man does anybody read anymore. Go back and READ. Well said? what the H... is well said.

:huh:

 

Of Course I read the previous messages, more over, I keep the subject from the beginning, but I dare say that in this case, I prefer to make an opinion, not a criticism, given the subject.

[HiJack]

I have had enough "talk on" from DCS-A10C now and is going back to FC2 playing with Su-33 and some other stuff for a while :joystick: I sure hope ED decides to create some aircrafts with simpler cockpit and systems for us eternally rookies that want to play with the updated AI and graphics that DCS series gives. From time to time I find it annoying when you need to repeat the JTAC info all the time just to get a target to shoot at. I just want some quick action when coming home from a hard day’s work and just let all hell lose at some innocent AI flying around. Yes yes I know I'm going to hear HAWKS arguments now, bring it on :fear:

 

(HJ)

[104th_Crunch]

I have had enough "talk on" from DCS-A10C now and is going back to FC2 playing with Su-33 and some other stuff for a while :joystick: I sure hope ED decides to create some aircrafts with simpler cockpit and systems for us eternally rookies that want to play with the updated AI and graphics that DCS series gives. From time to time I find it annoying when you need to repeat the JTAC info all the time just to get a target to shoot at. I just want some quick action when coming home from a hard day’s work and just let all hell lose at some innocent AI flying around. Yes yes I know I'm going to hear HAWKS arguments now, bring it on :fear:

 

(HJ)

 

What about arcade mode within DCS? Does that not have what you are looking for? I think the answer is DCS with arcade modes for people with tastes such as yourself. Not a new survey sim that is not detailed like DCS. No time for that I think.

Edited June 8, 2011 by Crunch

[Aliboy]

Crunch everyone knows how amazingly complex DCS is and people say you know it takes a long time etc.... but...that's exactly why I feel FC3 should be made...because If ED does such complex work why cant they make FC3 as like a side project...I dunno what others want FC3 to be but I would like Cold War Era Aircraft for eg to make at-least Mig-21,23,25,27 and the F-16,F-18,F-14,F-4 flyable with basic features like in FC2....It would be so much more fun online...and most importantly create spare aircraft "slots" where user created aircraft can be added on.

[104th_Crunch]

Crunch everyone knows how amazingly complex DCS is and people say you know it takes a long time etc.... but...that's exactly why I feel FC3 should be made...because If ED does such complex work why cant they make FC3 as like a side project...I dunno what others want FC3 to be but I would like Cold War Era Aircraft for eg to make at-least Mig-21,23,25,27 and the F-16,F-18,F-14,F-4 flyable with basic features like in FC2....It would be so much more fun online...and most importantly create spare aircraft "slots" where user created aircraft can be added on.

 

Of course Ali, different personal preferences that's all. I push for DCS:Fighter over spending time on a survey sim because that is my own taste. Different strokes for different folks.

Edited June 8, 2011 by Crunch

[Steel Jaw]

Lets all chill ... and finish Nellis.

[Vekkinho]

In case of FC3 please return General visibility slider in Mission editor/weather...

 

Current FC2 skies are to clear IMHO.

[Dudikoff]

I dunno what others want FC3 to be but I would like Cold War Era Aircraft for eg to make at-least Mig-21,23,25,27 and the F-16,F-18,F-14,F-4 flyable with basic features like in FC2....It would be so much more fun online...and most importantly create spare aircraft "slots" where user created aircraft can be added on.

 

Now we're talking.. Late Cold War era FTW!!

 

(but add a MiG-31 and Su-24 to the bare minimum list, though :) )

[FLANKERATOR]

FC is maybe one of, not to say THE, best PvP air combat thing that has ever been produced, a hypothetical FC3, regardless of its features, would be another successful chapter of this mighty saga.

[EtherealN]

Lets all chill ... and finish Nellis.

 

That's not an either-or. Different people do different things.

[124SqZeljava]

Excuse me if i may, so what is FC3?

Edited June 12, 2011 by =124Sq=Zeljava

[EtherealN]

Read the thread. :P

 

"FC3" is, at present, nothing. It is the popular name of a possible development of Flaming Cliffs towards compatibility with DCS:A-10C, but it is important to underscore that no decision on the matter has yet been announced. Do not jump to conclusions.

[Viper101]

Excuse me if i may, so what is FC3?

 

The epitome of awesome.

[124SqZeljava]

Read the thread. :P

 

"FC3" is, at present, nothing. It is the popular name of a possible development of Flaming Cliffs towards compatibility with DCS:A-10C, but it is important to underscore that no decision on the matter has yet been announced. Do not jump to conclusions.

Ok rgr that sir:thumbup: i don`t play it anymore, maybe because a lot of things i didn`t like in my thread long time bofore, don`t get me wrong i still think it is a great product but i lost my interest in playing cause if you wanna be good there is no space for single guy playing online, you need at least 2 more guy`s flying with you (what i don`t like, i can`t get concentrate with many of us) so you can make something. Thank you for quick answer and cheers to all Pilots. S!

[Steel Jaw]

The epitome of awesome.

 

I think not. ;)

[124SqZeljava]

I think not. ;)

Ooo my god, Mower man u have really strong computer(Windoze 7 ultimate 64 bit | i920/2.65 overclocked to 3.7 | Cooler Master V8 CPU cooler | EVGA x58 mobo | 6 GB OCZ 1600 speed DDR3 ram | EVGA 470 GTX o/c to 750/1500/1800 | 2x 24" widescreens | Cougar HOTAS/Saitek x52 Pro/Saitek rudders | TIR 4 w/clip.) , is it just because of FC needing or??? Really nice peace of hardware Cheers:thumbup:

[Boberro]

The FC3 shortname is the name of incoming happiness :D

The happiness incoming which is not stoppable.

Edited June 12, 2011 by Boberro