Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just get 12GB, that's half way between the 2 :D

i7-4820k @ 3.7, Windows 7 64-bit, 16GB 1866mhz EVGA GTX 970 2GB, 256GB SSD, 500GB WD, TM Warthog, TM Cougar MFD's, Saitek Combat Pedals, TrackIR 5, G15 keyboard, 55" 4K LED

 

Posted

use the extra RAM to make a RAMDRIVE to run your pagefile and temp files from.

If your really keen you could set it up to copy the game to ramdisk on boot then it will load up super fast :)

Posted

Just upgraded myself, also went with 16gb

 

For the price of RAM (now) there is zero reason not to, we're talking $30-40 difference between a 8gb kit and 16gb kit

Posted

Wow,, great feedback,, opinions from both sides,,, Im not sure about the comment that "more ram = slower ram" though,, that concerns me,,, will it slow down or impede overclocking?

Windows 10 Pro - 64 Bit / ASUS ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming / AMD 7800X3D / G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO 64GB DDR5 6000 Ram / SSD M.2 SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB / MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X 24G / SteelSeries Arctis 7 Headset /LG-Ultragear 38" IPS LED Ultrawide HD Monitor (3840 x 1600) / Track IR4 / Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Virpil HOTAS VPC Constellation ALPHA-R & VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle

 

Posted

This probably refers to the fact, that having 4 memory modules (compared to 2) in your system causes a higher "load" on the overall bus when overclocking (raising the bus clock) and that might cause some instabilties.

I don't see any reason for a slowdown though. As long as the speed (e.g. 1333 MHz) and the CL (e.g. 8 or 9) stays the same there won't be any slowdowns.

Posted
Wow,, great feedback,, opinions from both sides,,, Im not sure about the comment that "more ram = slower ram" though,, that concerns me,,, will it slow down or impede overclocking?

 

My upgrade was same as yours

 

i5 2500k, 16gb ram, SSD, already had a video card. etc

 

Let me tell you, with a decent ($40) aftermarket cpu cooler, I overclocked EASILY to 4.5ghz

 

This thing is running so fast its almost criminal :)

Posted
This probably refers to the fact, that having 4 memory modules (compared to 2) in your system causes a higher "load" on the overall bus when overclocking (raising the bus clock) and that might cause some instabilties.

I don't see any reason for a slowdown though. As long as the speed (e.g. 1333 MHz) and the CL (e.g. 8 or 9) stays the same there won't be any slowdowns.

 

Hmmmmm,,, so couldnt I get just 2 sticks of 8 Gig, instead of 4 sticks of 4 Gig to resolve that theory?

Windows 10 Pro - 64 Bit / ASUS ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming / AMD 7800X3D / G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO 64GB DDR5 6000 Ram / SSD M.2 SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB / MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X 24G / SteelSeries Arctis 7 Headset /LG-Ultragear 38" IPS LED Ultrawide HD Monitor (3840 x 1600) / Track IR4 / Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Virpil HOTAS VPC Constellation ALPHA-R & VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle

 

Posted
Hmmmmm,,, so couldnt I get just 2 sticks of 8 Gig, instead of 4 sticks of 4 Gig to resolve that theory?

 

Exactly what I did... 2 - 8 gig sticks of G.Skills Ripjaws 1333mhz

 

And leaves me room for another set of 8 gig sticks down the road

 

Must better option than maxing out all 4 slots now, and having no room to expand in the future

Posted
Explain?

 

I've read filling up all ram slots can put extra strain on the memory controller on a motherboard, so a previously stable overclock with 8gb or ram could become unstable with 16gb.

 

I also read somewhere command rates for memory can change which effectively reduces the bandwidth of ram and slows down as more is added.

 

Then again, I don't know a great deal about computers. Maybe someone else can chime in.

Posted

I think you're right in the fact that the more ram installed means the bus has to be split x number of times for the increased capacity.

 

I could be way off...

 

Also seem to remember reading a post saying just because the 'reported' speed of the ram is now half what it is on the box, it is still running top speed.

 

Really the only ones that should be concerned about if they are getting that extra 1.0 mhz or 0.5mhz boost, are probably already stressing over the color cable ties they use.

  • Like 1
Posted

SSD is the best upgrade in computer technology since the cpu itself. Says it all :p

 

srsly, get an SATA3 or better SSD, you are not gonna believe how fast your computer gets.

i7 8700K | GTX 1080 Ti | 32GB RAM | 500GB M.2 SSD | TIR5 w/ Trackclip Pro | TM Hotas Warthog | Saitek Pro Flight Rudder

 

[sigpic]http://www.132virtualwing.org[/sigpic]

 

Posted

I am getting a SSD, I was asking about the ram here. Thanks

Windows 10 Pro - 64 Bit / ASUS ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming / AMD 7800X3D / G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO 64GB DDR5 6000 Ram / SSD M.2 SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB / MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X 24G / SteelSeries Arctis 7 Headset /LG-Ultragear 38" IPS LED Ultrawide HD Monitor (3840 x 1600) / Track IR4 / Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Virpil HOTAS VPC Constellation ALPHA-R & VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle

 

Posted
I've read filling up all ram slots can put extra strain on the memory controller on a motherboard, so a previously stable overclock with 8gb or ram could become unstable with 16gb.

 

I also read somewhere command rates for memory can change which effectively reduces the bandwidth of ram and slows down as more is added.

 

Then again, I don't know a great deal about computers. Maybe someone else can chime in.

This is true for older chipsets with lower bandwidth. Adding a chip taxed the bus and memory controller and when it recognized another load had been placed (a 2GB or a 8 GB chip has nearly the same load, X amount of channels per chip) it had to compensate by either increase voltage, decrease bus clock or increase the timings of the chip.

 

On THIS chipset the memory controller is designed for it. In order to strain it at all you'd have to task the entire CPU with nothing but memory input/output. And if it's the case that you're running the system on 100% load all day and all night, the added ram will benefit a lot more than it will take away. Won't matter at all outside benchmarks.

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

i just upgraded to 16Gb kit and there is no performance boost in DCS whatsoever, 8GB was plenty.not that i expected any boost. did so since i'm building another machine (thats where the 8Gb kit will go) and purchasing any less at current price does seem strange. and it will be nice to have for the VM.

Anton.

 

My pit build thread .

Simple and cheap UFC project

Posted

thanks for clearing that up. Iam just getting a parts list together, and was going to wait until Presidents day sales,, do you think memory prices will be up by then or is it safe to wait a month?

Windows 10 Pro - 64 Bit / ASUS ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming / AMD 7800X3D / G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO 64GB DDR5 6000 Ram / SSD M.2 SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB / MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X 24G / SteelSeries Arctis 7 Headset /LG-Ultragear 38" IPS LED Ultrawide HD Monitor (3840 x 1600) / Track IR4 / Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Virpil HOTAS VPC Constellation ALPHA-R & VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle

 

Posted
I've read filling up all ram slots can put extra strain on the memory controller on a motherboard, so a previously stable overclock with 8gb or ram could become unstable with 16gb.

 

I also read somewhere command rates for memory can change which effectively reduces the bandwidth of ram and slows down as more is added.

 

Then again, I don't know a great deal about computers. Maybe someone else can chime in.

 

Have had my 2600k with 16gig ram overclocked to 4.6ghz for nearly 7mths now. All my benchmarking has shown that there is negligible if any impact going from 8 to 16gig ram.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D - MSI MAG X670E TomaHawk MB, ASUS ROG Ryujin III 360 AIO

64gig Corsair DDR5@6000, Gigabyte GeForce RTX 4090 AORUS

Winwing Super Taurus, Orion2, TO / Combat panels, Collective with Topgun MIP

Winwing Skywalker pedals, NLR Boeing Mil Edition Simpit, 55" Samsung Odyssey Ark, Trackir

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

What about going from 4gb to 8gb. Anyone got any experience of the kind of performance boost that might give?

Specs: GA-Z87X-UD3H, i7-4770k, 16GB, RTX2060, SB AE-5, 750watt Corsair PSU, X52, Track IR4, Win10x64.

 

Sim Settings: Textures: ? | Scenes: ? |Water: ? | Visibility Range: ? | Heat Blur: ? | Shadows: ? | Res: 1680x1050 | Aspect: 16:10 | Monitors: 1 Screen | MSAA: ? | Tree Visibility: ? | Vsync: On | Mirrors: ? | Civ Traffic: High | Res Of Cockpit Disp: 512 | Clutter: ? | Fullscreen: On

Posted

i was just running 4 gigs on an AMD Phenom, I got 8 gig (2 sticks) of GSkill 21300 (for a later i7 or i5 upgrade) and it easily doubled my framerates in heavy-load missions. 4 gig was pretty much all used up by DCS-A-10.

I also just upgraded my vid card to a 560Ti and that made another big jump.

i7 8700K @ 4.4Ghz, 16G 3200 RAM, Nvidia 1080Ti, T16000 HOTAS, TIR5, 75" DLP Monitor

Posted
In the middle of a new build cause my MOBO fried! Having A-10 withdraws now as well,,,, ANYWAY,, going with an i5 2500k CPU & SSD w/Win 7 ULT 64,,, was wondering if it was going to be worth going with 16 gig of ram vs 8 in regards to DCS A-10 Performance? Thanks

 

My laptop is i5 2.4-2.9 GHz and I just upgraded my mem module to 2 X 4Gb instead of factory 2 x 2Gb.. No difference in performance. Highly unadvised..

 

My thought would be for you to save a little, get a higher processor 3.2Ghz - ish... and a compatible MB with 8Gb preinstalled.. That is what I would do if I had the money...

AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS

 

Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.

Posted
My laptop is i5 2.4-2.9 GHz and I just upgraded my mem module to 2 X 4Gb instead of factory 2 x 2Gb.. No difference in performance. Highly unadvised..

 

My thought would be for you to save a little, get a higher processor 3.2Ghz - ish... and a compatible MB with 8Gb preinstalled.. That is what I would do if I had the money...

 

 

Ram is better thought of as the ability to "Multi Task" more powerfuly than to think it will some how allow for more speed. Chipset speeds removed the need to have a northbridge wich amounted to speed in relationship to ram. Not so today.

This was a Boutique Builder iBuypower rig. Until I got the tinker bug again i7 920 @3.6Mhz 12Gig Corsair XMS3 ram 1600 Nvidia 760 SLi w/4Gig DDR5 Ram Intel 310 SSD HDD 160 Gb + Western Digital 4Terabyte HDD Creative SB X-Fi HD Audio Logitech X-530 5.1 Surround Speaker System Dual Acer 32"Monitors. PSU 1200 w Thermaltake Win10 64Bit.

Posted
Ram is better thought of as the ability to "Multi Task" more powerfuly than to think it will some how allow for more speed. Chipset speeds removed the need to have a northbridge wich amounted to speed in relationship to ram. Not so today.

 

OKaaaayyyy.... Ummmm... I am not really Tech savvy as you are man... So... :megalol:

AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS

 

Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...