Snoopy Posted August 30, 2013 Posted August 30, 2013 I just reread the "What is DCS" post, and the distinction may be fuzzy. I cropped the unnecessary stuff and bolded for emphasis. It looks like the T-2 is a partner product to me. Until it say's "ED Partner" under their forum name instead of "3rd Party Developer" they're a 3rd party IMO. v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website
Silver_Dragon Posted September 3, 2013 Author Posted September 3, 2013 For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
Suchacz Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 (edited) Is that tandem-seat Pilatus? Wow, I would like to try that baby! But I'm not sure, because plane on those pics have cranked wings and an arch at the front of the windshield. Maybe some early version? Edited September 3, 2013 by Suchacz Per aspera ad astra! Crucial reading about DCS: Black Shark - Black Shark and Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamics, Black Shark and the Trimmer, Black Shark – Autopilot: Part 1, Black Shark – Autopilot: Part 2
GeorgeLKMT Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Is that tandem-seat Pilatus? Wow, I would like to try that baby! But I'm not sure, because plane on those pics have cranked wings and an arch at the front of the windshield. Maybe some early version? I think it's a T-6 Texan II ;) 1 ■ L-39C/ZA Czech cockpit mod ■ My DCS skins ■
MFG62 Joker Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 my guess would be Beechcraft T-6 , OK George wa a little faster 1
Suchacz Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 (edited) Oh, looks like you're right, rep to both :thumbup: Edited September 3, 2013 by Suchacz Per aspera ad astra! Crucial reading about DCS: Black Shark - Black Shark and Coaxial Rotor Aerodynamics, Black Shark and the Trimmer, Black Shark – Autopilot: Part 1, Black Shark – Autopilot: Part 2
MudRat02 Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 (edited) Is that tandem-seat Pilatus? Wow, I would like to try that baby! But I'm not sure, because plane on those pics have cranked wings and an arch at the front of the windshield. Maybe some early version? It's not the Pilatus PC-9, you can tell because it has the fin on the underside and the canopy is slightly different at the front (the PC9 doesn't have a canopy bow at the front). Its the T-6 texan II by the looks of things. I've not had a chance to fly the Texan but I've got some hours up on the PC-9, avionics are a bit dated especially when compared to the former (would be good to have the 'green stuff') but it is good fun! Edited September 4, 2013 by MudRat02 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Silver_Dragon Posted September 8, 2013 Author Posted September 8, 2013 New progress on Mirage 2000 For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
phant Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 New progress on Mirage 2000 Maybe i'm wrong but i think this is for FSX, not DCS. Bye Phant
phant Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 (edited) SOURCE - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=512214595531850&set=a.316309961788982.75719.316077818478863&type=1 - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=512214732198503&set=a.316309961788982.75719.316077818478863&type=1 - https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=512214925531817&set=a.316309961788982.75719.316077818478863&type=1 Bye Phant Edited September 8, 2013 by phant
Silver_Dragon Posted September 8, 2013 Author Posted September 8, 2013 Maybe i'm wrong but i think this is for FSX, not DCS. Bye Phant Check them: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1850334&postcount=42 For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
phant Posted September 8, 2013 Posted September 8, 2013 (edited) Check them: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1850334&postcount=42 I know that will be a 2000C DCS version but i think this screens are from FSX version. Maybe i'm wrong. Bye Phant Edited September 8, 2013 by phant
Prowler111 Posted September 10, 2013 Posted September 10, 2013 I'd like it if they didn't start making 50 aircraft before even progressing very far with one... Well, i think we are not giving the correct message or it´s not understandable. We do have a lineup, and we do have some different 3d developers (myself included), each one to their own project.Currently, the T-2 is very far into development, sure it might not be a popular one, but will cover a need into the sim. The T-6 TexanII you see here is being developed by Jose Valdez, and the M2000C by Tim Taylor, both, will see the light of the day in DCS, but at their own time.By the moment the T-2 is out, we must have the basics(3d mesh work for both exterior and cockpit, mapping/texturing, animations) for the next project ready so the tedious and complicated process of coding into it can begin and so on, that way, we can have a fluid production line.What you´re seeing is part of that process while is being done, we can always change this and simply show nothing.Like i already stated, we are doing incremental developments as the source code evolves, this means we have to adapt our production line up with what we currently have available. Best regards Prowler 1
VincentLaw Posted September 10, 2013 Posted September 10, 2013 The T-2 should be popular with any prospective hornet pilots. By the time any of the other naval aviation modules are released, you will have probably forgotten you even spent money on it. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Bedouin Posted September 10, 2013 Posted September 10, 2013 The T-2, can't it be used as a F-18 trainer, because then i am sure it will be popular, and i would be more than happy to invest in it...
JaseGill Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 Again the "Not Military don't want" argument. Does no one here, other than those of us who have flown military and civil, understand that the rules are the same and before you're let loose on a Military aircraft you learn in one that's not much different from a civil one. The laws of physics don't suddenly change when you hang ordnance under the airframe... Sometimes the pleasure of flying alone is worthwhile enough to me that I don't want to worry about the RWR screaming at me or having to dodge Shilka's. Now some will say of that "Go do it in FSX or X-PLane 10 then". No, Id rather do it in the same environment that I will later fly combat in and with the same flight model fidelity as I'm used to on DCS. Simple really. If you don't want it don't buy it, but I think you will be missing out on some good training time in the Sim. J. Rig: Home Built, water cooled,i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz, ASUS P8P67Pro Mobo, 8GB Patriot Viper 2 Sector 5 RAM, MSI Nvidia GTX970 4GB Gaming OC, 120GB OCZ Vertex 2e SSD Boot, 120GB OCZ Vertex 2e SSD Games (BS & WH), Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB other, Samsung UE37D5000 37" LED TV,EloTouch 1600x1200 secondary, Thrustmaster Warthog No.467, Thrustmaster MFD, Saitek Pro Pedals, Track IR4 with Track Clip Pro. Ex RAF Aircrew, Real Life Pilot, proud Geek and father of one :)
Spectre_USA Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 The laws of physics don't suddenly change when you hang ordnance under the airframe... J. Well, yeah, they do, but I get what you're saying, and the S.A. in me just couldn't leave it alone... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] A tale of 2 hogs
VincentLaw Posted September 11, 2013 Posted September 11, 2013 Well, yeah, they do[...] Hanging junk on an airplane has a big impact on aerodynamics, stability, structural loading, etc., however, the "laws" of physics (as stated by JaseGill) do not change. In any case, a discussion about the laws of physics is off topic. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
whartsell Posted September 12, 2013 Posted September 12, 2013 Hanging junk on an airplane has a big impact on aerodynamics, stability, structural loading, etc., however, the "laws" of physics (as stated by JaseGill) do not change. In any case, a discussion about the laws of physics is off topic. Just saw the post and you beat me to it :) Arduino,EOS and Helios Tutorial Static ATC menu mod
JaseGill Posted September 12, 2013 Posted September 12, 2013 Spectre, I think you'll find the laws of physics are static and don't change. There is effect on the aircraft based on weight, drag and other factors but that's not the laws of physics changing, that's the laws of physics in effect. Anyway, this isn't Aerodynamics 101 and as above its off topic anyway. I'm still in favour of civil based aircraft either way and there is still the if you don't want em don't buy em argument. The way I see it the more there is in DCS World the more chance its got to survive in the difficult climate of business case vs simulation cost. It may not be perfect but its the best so far at trying to build a world thats expandable and can be populated by more and more aircraft/vehicles/terrain. Everyone argues for a persistent world on a persistent server which would be nice. That said imagine logging into that persistent world and waiting for the other 100 folks ahead to start, taxi and depart from every airport on the system. Its bad enough in real life being stuck in a departure queue or trying to get that last required touch and go in but at least you know everyone in the real world ahead knows what they're doing, isn't going to crash on approach or block the runway and have everyone else waiting for hours... J. Rig: Home Built, water cooled,i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz, ASUS P8P67Pro Mobo, 8GB Patriot Viper 2 Sector 5 RAM, MSI Nvidia GTX970 4GB Gaming OC, 120GB OCZ Vertex 2e SSD Boot, 120GB OCZ Vertex 2e SSD Games (BS & WH), Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB other, Samsung UE37D5000 37" LED TV,EloTouch 1600x1200 secondary, Thrustmaster Warthog No.467, Thrustmaster MFD, Saitek Pro Pedals, Track IR4 with Track Clip Pro. Ex RAF Aircrew, Real Life Pilot, proud Geek and father of one :)
Silver_Dragon Posted September 12, 2013 Author Posted September 12, 2013 more 3D model cockpit Mirage 2000C For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
JaseGill Posted September 12, 2013 Posted September 12, 2013 Looking really good Silver Dragon. Nice jet. J. Rig: Home Built, water cooled,i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz, ASUS P8P67Pro Mobo, 8GB Patriot Viper 2 Sector 5 RAM, MSI Nvidia GTX970 4GB Gaming OC, 120GB OCZ Vertex 2e SSD Boot, 120GB OCZ Vertex 2e SSD Games (BS & WH), Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB other, Samsung UE37D5000 37" LED TV,EloTouch 1600x1200 secondary, Thrustmaster Warthog No.467, Thrustmaster MFD, Saitek Pro Pedals, Track IR4 with Track Clip Pro. Ex RAF Aircrew, Real Life Pilot, proud Geek and father of one :)
Ells228 Posted September 12, 2013 Posted September 12, 2013 Ooooh I like those shots, great job guys!!
Maxzouz Posted September 12, 2013 Posted September 12, 2013 Ooooh I like those shots, great job guys!! Me too ! As far as i can remembrer this is the first plane i've seen when i was a child. I'm just in love. Can't wait to fly it
phant Posted September 12, 2013 Posted September 12, 2013 http://metal2mesh.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&p=860#p859 Bye Phant
Recommended Posts