All Activity

I's a beautiful map - pretty much all I use now. As Tomcatter87 said, there can be times when those beautiful mountain ridges resolve into sharp meshes when you get very close, but that aside, it is a very convincing bit of real estate to fly round in (If only they would finish the North!!!)

No problem! Just post them here in this thread at your convenience, and I'm sure it will be resolved in not time! Enjoy your shift and welcome to the forum!

It's funny how some people fall obsessively in love with DCS, and then something that was there all along becomes too much for them to bear and causes them to cast it aside - and they become like those people who've divorced their partner, but the anger still dominates their consciousness. They can't let go, and instead their energy goes into persuading everyone they can that their one-time love is the cause of all the ills in the world.

@Melt-Down Just saw this too! Love your username, read it as "melt down in DCS wishlist".

Thanks mate, I known I was harsh and it was just stupid and all do to my pure lazyness that I didn't do anything for such a long period of time, and yes I'll send you a screenshot but currently I am at work (night shift sucks) so you may have to wait a day, I apologize for the inconvenience. Have a really nice day, night or afternoon.

I’m very curious about the version and standard. this module has been strangely soft announced and confirmed several times.

не забудь там на OpenXR ПихКанат перевести,чтобы без стимВР оно работало! C:\Program Files\PICO Connect\openvr_driver\resources\ps_xrt\add_runtime.bat ну это несомненно!

This only (or typically) occurs when moving the mouse? Might be experiencing the mouse polling issue that some users still get with updates.... Recommend ruling it out at least by dropping the polling rate in your mouse software to below 1000, try 500 and even 250 or 125 to see if it changes anything.

Seriously! You've had it for a month, and you ask for help now, when it's working for everyone else? I don't intend to be harsh, because I truly deeply know how frustrating it is when something doesn't work. But calling it a bad module when it's obviously a problem in your end, that's just bad style. Apologies! Post screenshots of your bindings and your F-4E Special settings. Ie. LWin+LShft+S, (not with your phone), and your DCS.log. DCS\logs under Saved Games. Also. NEVER re-install. A full repair is much quicker, and does the same thing. It will not touch Saved Games though. So any problems/corruptions that are there will not be repaired. A quick test is just to rename the DCS folder under your saved games, after a repair, and you have a plain vanilla installation. You could actually try to rename it now, in case you have any conflicting mods. Cheers, and best of luck! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Чего интересного? Ну Су-57 в Комсомольске. На сколько помню на нём уже летал военный лётчик который принимал самолёт. А перед ним по идее облёт проводили заводские лётчики. Как же так вышло, что самолёт "Устал" всего за несколько вылетов? А где же "Качество" и "Строгий контроль"?)

Hi Ben, The IR lights around the lenses are not active, which is normal for the Crystal Light. This model doesn’t include eye-tracking, so it only supports fixed foveated rendering.

The radar is still pretty heavily screwed, even after the most recent update. 3rdErraticTWS.trk

Да нет, юморист это вы... Со своим упорством про "ТАК В ДОКУМЕНТЕ НАПИСАНО!" А ещё по ГОСТам у нас в стране дороги должны быть идеально ровные(не считая маленьких неровностей). Но чет-не работает закон. Видимо до дороги не довели что она без ям должна быть. Может вы ситуацию исправите?) Конечно сказки, мне ж делать нефиг сочинять сказки, тем более доказывая что-то такому бронебойному персонажу. У которого во всём мире зелёная индикация)

The kneeboard page referencing waypoints and speeds (headings & airspeed) in Mission 10 of the Museum Relic Campaign is incorrect. The kneeboard displays all speeds in km/h instead of knots. The chart in the mission briefing window is correct; however, the page in the kneeboard is not correct and does not match the briefing window. Within the mission file, filename Waypoint Grid 512.png in the l10n > DEFAULT folder should replace the KB F86 MR10c.png file in the KNEEBOARD > IMAGES folder. Tested on DCS 2.9.20.15384. As a temporary workaround, it should be sufficient for the user to move the Waypoint Grid 512.png file into the users > saved games > DCS > Kneeboard > F-86F Sabre folder.

Have you updated to the latest version of DCS? I spoke with one of their team members, and they mentioned there was a known issue recently that caused crashes in Pimax when secondary shadows were enabled. I’m not sure if this is the same error you’ve encountered, but I’ve forwarded the two codes to them and am waiting for feedback from their tech support.

Where can I download ships? Thanks, Timex3

It's a suggestion. And I have complained before to ED that they should change the text, and NOT suggest Google. @NineLine @BIGNEWY About time to change it now, ain't it? Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Thanks to the advice of an online mate, before taking off I now fully cycle all trim tabs and then set them to 6, 6 and 1. This seems to mitigate the occasional hard right roll on take off.

Ouch! I misunderstood. I thought you meant the post where ED clarified and debunked Enigmas claims. My bad. Cheers! Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

So, @NineLine, we would love more details on this null

So, what, western RWRs are just magical with perfect bearing accuracy, range etc. Despite many accounts to the contrary? Meanwhile we have evidence that the 29's RWR is blanked, cuz its not really that hard to do. We have pilots and techs saying it worked, and some that said it was broken. I mean its not hard to believe both are true. Parts ran out after the collapse of the SU, even likely in russia. And the few parts that existed likely were held back for actual wartime use. Moreover the SPO-15 worked on plenty of other aircraft with radars, and you want us to believe that for some reason the Soviets "forgot" to make it work with the mig-29.... Sure thing...

In these attachments, the R-27R appears to miss by a lot but still kills the enemy planes. The missile does not appear dsynced to the player launching but does for everybody else. The track file named "Zipper 1-1 TRK" is from Zipper 1-1's perspective. In this track file, his missiles appear to be tracking the plane he fired on all the way until impact. However, the opponents missiles do not appear to track at all but the engagement still ends in a trade. In my track file named "R27T-20250928 etc" the opposite is true. My missiles appear to be tracking my opponent but his are flying in a straight line not tracking me. Despite this, the fights still end in a trade. The track named "R27-1.trk" shows every missile from both players not tracking while they both still get shot down. This was repeated every time in a small multiplayer server made with no scripts or mods. Kill3.mp4 Zipper 1-1 TRK.trk R27R-1.acmi R27-1.trk R27T-20250928-194543.trk

Нашёл видео по TF модификации. Мне кажется, у них там вместо штуки с прорезью, стоит сплошной упор.

Hi Falong here I have had this certain problem with the Jester Wheel not showing up I've had this problem since I bought the product. I've tried repairing DCS and uninstalling the product and DCS itself toggling the "HB UI override) I am on a pc with no VR, and with 32 gb of ram GTX 4090 and a compatible cpu I have set all my graphics to low. The Jester context action is definetly bound to a and on every device I bind it to it still does not work. This is quite a bad module to be honest had it for a long time(1 month) still cannot work properly. I understand it's hard to make something like this but c'mon really? No image sorry will send track file en request

Oh, you were right. Interesting! It seems to be a new-ish addition and it's glorious. https://youtu.be/oV0oZvng3Pc?si=Krqa8SiYP1--eH4D The clearance guy in the tower also sounds a bit like @Wags. They have made their own small LLM, but they run it on their own server - not client-side, so there is no performance impact for players. You're right that this might not be commercially viable for DCS (i'm surprised it works for them to be honest), but ED could (and should) copy their approach. In a way it is very similar to my proposal, only that BATC have their own cloud-based model, while i propose an API hook at a similar position in the pipeline. In both cases the key is, that the LLM doesn't run the show by itself but is more "informational", while actual decisions are made on the scripted level. I hope ED watch the linked video and get inspirations from it. It's important to understand that such a lightweight LLM like BATC uses will soon run on every gaming PC and will do so with minimal latency - either on a few CPU cores or on a cheap, dedicated AI accelerator card. The complex part is not the LLM. The LLM is only an economical hurdle and won't be that forever.