All Activity

some of the trees in the Damgarten base may need some trimming

Lo penso anche io, per quanto mi riguarda preferisco il mio pico 4 alla max risoluzione e dettagli alti in dcs con fps bloccati a 75.

We have a fun, low-key group that flies weekly missions with various roles divided among who is flying (SEAD, CAP, etc.). We use time during the week to chat and fly training stuff and then have a defined mission flight on Thursdays or Fridays at 8:00EST. We are looking to grow our small group. So if you like flying, want to learn, and have some laid back fun in defined missions, please check us out: Flight Sim Junkies https://discord.gg/SynugPsgD

We have a fun, low-key group that flies weekly missions with various roles divided among who is flying (SEAD, CAP, etc.). We use time during the week to chat and fly training stuff and then have a defined mission flight on Thursdays or Fridays at 8:00EST. We are looking to grow our small group. So if you like flying, want to learn, and have some laid back fun in defined missions, please check us out: Flight Sim Junkies https://discord.gg/SynugPsgD

Initial version, is available for download: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3347157/ I'll update the mod every Sunday, until I'm done revising. Enjoy.

I hope I don't feel dumb when I hear the solution to this, But I am not able to add a drop tank to the 109. I can add tanks to the FW. When I do an arm and refuel sitting on the runway I only get a choice to add an SC250 or SC500 bomb. I tried offline writing a mission with an airstart that included the drop tank. When I launch the mission my plane doesn't have a drop tank. What am I missing? I've searched forum and internet and manual. I dont' have a clue here....

I've never used this myself, but it does exist... AH-64D Downscaled (Reduced) Cockpit Textures https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3321192/

I guess it is included in its period correct state: the aerodrome is not yet operational, but can be used in case of emergency. Personally, I see all these unfinished, unmarked and closed aerodromes as a free bonus. They never promised us Qusahwira, and it is not crucial to a map that is focused on the Strait of Hormuz. So, instead of complaining that my glass is half-empty, I'm grateful that someone has poured in a little bit more water than promised.

Steam or Standalone? Post your DCS.log? Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Hello We spotted what seems to be a variant of this bug : After firing multiple 120, missiles flyout don't align correctly with the target of the missile when we switch LS-DT2. Side report: The lock/shoot indicator only briefly flash "SHOOT". It should remain steady as target is locked and within Rmax when A50 is hot (at 1min). Manual : null Track done on 2.9.20.15384 test_RDRMissileFlyout.acmi test_RDRMissileFlyout.trk

Watch at 5:15. It looks like it’s modeled already

Great help no doubt - "Spend few thousand on a hardware so you can buy more modules If it was suitable 'for gaming' I wouldn't buy anything from ED store, in matter of fact I wouldn't complain here AT ALL! ...don't require bigger resolutions... The moment I require to upgrade that machine for games I'm selling the account for ED! So yeah is not your money. Cheers!

@HUZARN If you expect the professional approach from developers, write a professional and clear message, everyone will repect it. You have described a turn from 700kmh airspeed and 35-40 deg turn but it mean precisely nothing for aerodynamics nor flight manuals. Take a look at MiG29 Flight Manual book of your colleague, take a look at Practical Aerodynamics of MiG-29 book (Russian language only), analyze the diagrams and let us know what is wrong with DCS model. You could use your friend-pilot flight data from real flight and compare with DCS flight data. Real MiG29 flight data was several times compared with DCS - it happened on this sub-forum for Russian language discussion.

I run my (really expensive) professional software on a P4000, so I know it's limits. Why I run on 1440? I have only one 32" monitor and simulators/games don't require bigger resolutions... Btw: you're free to fry your (2018) pro-only GPU with games, it's not my money... Best regards.

Yes, that's right. Your GPU isn't suitable for gaming. Just google it. But you don't seem to be interested in getting help and instead just complain that your problems are caused by ED.

Hello, While playing with MS on the ground, we spotted that MSI trackfiles were showing speed 0. Digging into, it seems that the speed of a MSI track is dependant of our own plane speed. Here: an A50 orbitting FL250@M0.7 MSI trackfile display first speed 0 while on the ground After takeof, at 280kts, MSI trackfile displayed M0.5. Then I slowed down to stall, speed of trackfile slowed down too, to a M0.3. It never displayed real expected M0.7 Track done on 2.9.20.15384 test_MSI_speed.trk test_MSI_speed.acmi

Hey Flappie, thank you very much for the update. Good news for sure.

I am far from my computer at this moment, I'll send you pm with link after 10/08

Hey there fellas! Do you have an idea what this symbolgy is about? KNQX is the ICAO for the Naval Air Station Key West. You see a F/A-18 right on the 29s nose. The picture has been taken by Robert „Robbs“ Hierl, a former german Mig-29 Pilot. Therefore this must have been a MIG-29G.

Hopefully you read the part about the limited map support

If Aware29 is correct, could this behaviour be represented in the FFB application? Such as not using full force until AoA limiter activates, at which point FFB pulls forward in sync with the visuals, and then needing to use full force to override AoA limiter? That would be amazing!

Несоотвествие индикация нашлемки описанной в публично доступных документах работы бортовых систем Миг29а и Миг29б. В фрагментах документов описано, что отображение на прицельном приборе состоит: - прицельного "кольца" состоящего из сплошных двух концентрических сплошных колец - сплошной сигнальный "крест" Основные доступные режимы отображения: - прицельное "кольцо" постояного свечения, сигнальный "рест" отключен - прицельное мигающее "кольцо" (2гц+-0.5гц), сигнальное "крест" отключен - постоянное свечение прицельного "кольца" и сигнального "креста" - попеременное мигание прицельного и сигнального при команде НОП. В модуле вместо сплошного мигающего прицельного "кольца" отображаются преривистые мигающие прицельное кольца, а также приривистый сигнальный "крест", вместо сплошных в соответствующих режимах. Вопрос больше не о режимах, а о отображении индикации.

After landing at Krasnodar Center in a MiG-29, there is an instant 15-20 fps drop as soon as the wheels touch the ground. Takeoff, flyover in the 29 or landing with other aircraft will not case any issue. I have attached two tracks: one with a MiG-29, one with a MiG-21. MIG29_krasnodarcenter_30Sept2025.trk MIG21_krasnodarcenter_30Sept2025.trk

I'm much more impressed by properly modeled systems, realistic operations and a good flight model. The trinkets and physics on the aux cord are neat and sweet to see, but def shouldn't be priority. it is good to set some realistic expectations with modules, cause some things like a pilot model shaking around or bouncing around has 0 effect on delivering a high quality simulation. Maybe some shakiness on the sun-shades at most would be neat (if it isn't there already).

If the base was still under construction, then why include it? There are other airfields in the PG map that are imaged as terrain. For example, there is an airfield south of Fujairah that can be seen as an image. IMHO, this is evident of a larger problem: the arbitrary & capricious method of updating a module (terrain, aircraft, etc) and allowing things to "drop off". Case in point: I once reported a bug about ground units unable to follow certain roads in Kerman and Jiroft in 2022. In 2025, the problem was partially fixed. Kerman was kind of fixed but Jiroft was not. No additional explanation given, just Kerman was fixed to some extend while Jiroft was not fixed. Here's the link to that old thread. File attachments were removed because of age and the need to make room for more file space. Ground Unit Bugs As we can see in this instance of Qusahwire Air Base, it was modeled with parking slots assigned. One can "click" on it in the F10 map to pull generic data. However, in the ME, one cannot set a coalition or warehouse assets to this airfield. One could drop invisible FARP points along the airfield to add life but will be limited to the use of the Dynamic Slot system (for Helos & VSTOL aircraft). Perhaps someone could prove me wrong that you can spawn a fixed-wing aircraft at an invisible FARP? I must admit that I have not tested dynamic slots on FARPs with fixed-wing aircraft. As time marches on, I grow more tired and frustrated of tolerating the arbitrary & capricious nature of bug reporting/fixing bugs/module support. IMHO, this is one of many thousands of cuts that is either intentionally or unintentionally left to grow.