All Activity

Hey! Check my FAQ: Q3: Will the new core assets conflict with the Currenthill mod pack assets? A3: No. All new core assets have unique names and will therefore not conflict with the Currenthill mod pack assets.

The question is, is the 5 minutes time limit (It's more like 4 minutes from my tests) a total time for that flight, or 5 minutes at a time. If so, some direction on how long we need to wait to go back into WEP to reset the timer would be nice. From testing going into and out of WEP MAPs and adding up the time, it's a total of 5 minutes and the engine loses significant power and will seize if you do not back it off. Which means that having more than 5 minutes of water is pretty pointless. Hopefully this is just a simplified modeling step because it seems solely tied to MAP and time. I have not even tested if landing and refueling resets the timer. If it does not, then it's even more artificial.

I downloaded it today, approx. 2,1GB. Worked at 1st attempt and installation succeeded also with no issues. It must be an issue on your side.

I do not think so, from experience in Pimax 8kx with 160deg horizontal. As you do not see outside of HMD sweet spots, it is hard to just turn your head enough. Except with swivel chair, and maybe hand rudder (no pedals) - if that suits you.

Angling the mirrors does not change the reflection angle. That's the problem. It just makes them appear to be thinner or wider. It is definitely broken.

Thanks a lot man! Is the fix up?

I have been trying for days to download this mod and it keeps timing out 1/4 into the download. Are there any other ways outside of github to download this mod?

Awesome thank you very much for the infos. Very excited for this module

Can you be a little more exact please ?

Ответа не будет. Будет вопрос. Может, сначала посмотреть ливреи Ту-95МС от интегрированного СН, прежде чем пылить почем зря?

I don’t get to spend much time with dcs so I consider myself a novice. what is it and what’s it for?

These excessive light orb blooms have been a problem forever. However, It does not seem to be an impossible problems to solve, because the F18 had huge light orb blooms for years until they fixed them about a year or two ago. The carrier landing approach lights also had excessive light bloom which made the meatball unreadable. I think they made the IFOLS overlay to address the fact that the light orbs made reading the lights impossible. Regardless, they fixed the carrier lights for a short time and they became much more realistic, and completely usable. Unfortunately, they broke the IFOLS lighting again, so it's back to being a completely unreadable bloomy orbs that obscure the landing area once you're initially turning into the groove. The problem with the light-orb bloom effect is that the size of the orb remains the same absolute size on the screen, regardless of how far away you are from the light source...it does not scale down relative to the apparent size of plane/ship. Currently the worst offender is the CH-47. When you are 7 or 8 miles away, the red flashing beacon lights look light a 2000lb GBU flash-bang grenade. The nav lights create a orb/bloom capable of hiding multiple Ch-47s behind it. I'm not saying that the fix should be to properly scale the hazy light-orb with distance...the real answer is to get rid of the light-orb bloom completely. It's not realistic for most atmospheric conditions, and even when the human eye would see a hazy light blooming around a nav light (for example in foggy conditions), their luminosity would be attenuated by the the fog as distance increases. As far as blooms around the IFOLS lighting, perhaps if the ship is in a marine fog layer, maybe I could imagine the light blooming as badly as they do right now in clear atmospheric conditions in-game. But I don't think that's enough of a reason to keep the light bloom effect, when it makes absolutely everything else very unrealistic. It's horrible. Is this only a problem with VR?

OH58D_User_Guide.pdf Here you go.

Ahhhhhh, now I see. THanks for taking the time to explain all that and providing the video! Props...

а как пускать в огневом рубеже ракеты из новой техники? 9к720 и Атакмс, не работают

Salute, Please could I have an explanation as to what this means for the AH-64 Added Total Controls keyboard unit profiles. many thanks Regards DD_Friar

currently writing my own rust library cause im not the biggest fan of C#. This isnt supposed to be a "mines gonna be better" but merely serve as an additional tool for people to acomplish what they want in the way they want it

1 & 3: Meta Quest 3 (VR) 2: New system, but I had a similar issue on the old system with a RTX 3060 Ti card. On the old system, resetting Gamma pretty much took care of of it.

Which one to go for? 50, 57 or Ultrawide? The other thing I would like to know is how good the Super eye tracking is compared to the QP?

Maybe put this important piece of information in the Corsair section, rather than under an obscure title as 2025 Post Release Updates in the general M3 forum? It'd be also a good idea to post module-related information on the DCS forum also.

Good to know, thanks!

this is why a track file is so useful when diagnosing issues .. don’t get mad when someone that wants to help asks for one.

Same here. Yes, it is an early access, but there are some basic functions have to be fixed to be, at least operational.

Yes, the current system for troops should work.