All Activity

No still not fixed but solved in here. I posted the same question. You have to edit the LUA file Every time DCS update you have to re-edit the LUA file....

Я тебе разрешаю каждые 10 минут. Можешь даже каждые 5 минут.

Just tried it again - landed with 4,500 lbs of fuel, opened the AR door immediately after landing, taxied to parking spot, rearm and refuel with center tank connected still, 8,600lbs of fuel total. Still not completely full for some reason. I'm on the Falklands, if that matters. ahhh thank you so much, appreciate the help. If I remove them, will it remove them from the posts/comments I've already made on the threads? (im not sure what its called, forgive my ignorance)

Hi! Thanks for another update. I also see that other elements are coming along very well, and many details have appeared on the model itself, including those related to ground crew. Great, congratulations! The model is starting to look really great, and many third-party devs would certainly be proud of it in their first steps. Unfortunately, the front landing gear legs aren't quite where they should be. There are some issues noted in the posts above, but not only that. Here's the original photo, which shows the layout perfectly from the side. And analysis (the fuselage size has been adjusted to the photo): 1/ The angle of the support in the model is too great (too forward). It's actually there, but not to that extent. I assume this isn't a distorted screenshot in terms of the overall angle of the shot, but that's what it looks like here. The wheel bracket itself is now at a good angle, thanks! 2/ The wheel bracket should have one more element at the top, as already mentioned above. 3/ The model still sits too low. I suspect the main support (the one marked 1) is still too short. Since the size of the aircraft in the screenshot and the photo is the same, there's too much difference. Yes, the model in the photo probably isn't as heavily loaded with weapons and is lighter, but the shock absorber deflection isn't as great in real life. I suggest lengthening the components. You can see that the "strut leg" is pressed too tightly into the fuselage in the model. It may also be a matter of angle, too forward, but I also think it is a matter of length. It's also worth checking the model in the screenshot with just a full interiors tanks + 2 external tanks. What does the deflection and shock absorption look like here? I hope I've helped. Sorry for being a pain But the Su-22M4 has a rather distinctive silhouette, especially for us, who grew up with it for years. Thanks for all the corrections, and I'm keeping my fingers crossed for you!

While it may be true that the lack of coincidence of the markings is an issue in the real F-4 as well (I don't have a real aircraft immediately available I could use to check), it is certainly not a parallax issue. Regardless of head position, the "zero" elevation mark of the radar symbology is always at the same 1-2° positive elevation scale position. On the contrary, in the rear seat, the misalignment can be eliminated with an appropriate head position.

The 2024/2025 and Beyond video, made by ED, the AI zero and others PTO units as the USS Enterprise and CA Mogami was confimed made by ED from january 2024, no M3. The F4U release video was made by ED, no M3 and use the shame AI PTO units as the "zero" IA.

Народ извините за откровенность но вы ёбнутые. Вода в зависимости от освещения и формы и высоты облаков может меняться в цвете каждые 5-+ минут а вы тут говоре об какой то виртуальной. мёртвой воде. Забудьте об этих "красотах". Можно смоделировать более-менее похожий лес или поля с домиками, но воду. Забудь те просто и радуйтесь тому что сейчас есть. Сейчас намного правдоподобнее чем 10+ лет назад и это радует.

Next up, a F/A-18E skin, this time the original CAG scheme:

Hello, I know this has been reverted but please could someone TLDR why you would use this over 'assert' ?

I'm really sorry for the delay, but I'm getting less and less time at the moment. That said, I think I've found the solution. I'm posting here the full results of the last few months of upgrades, pending a hypothetical release. ==:20.88.553:== 553 fixed [timing] bug 2nd strike TOT 552 fixed [spawn] 6-pack spawn bug 551 fixed [assign] bug assigning player in multiplayer 550 fixed [alias] removal of aliases from oob_air_init, automatic transfer to \Init\various_table.lua 549 fixed [WPT] WPT before landing 548 fixed [spawn] anti-collision at air spawn 547 fixed [campaign] campaign can be updated during play by modifying Init files 546 fixed [date] 1970 bug again 545 add [date][time jump] time jump possible with conf_mod (change date in conf_mod then run SkipMission.BAT) 544 fixed [inter] player interceptors are "delayed" 543 fixed [weather] added latest weather presets + major bug on random weather 542 fixed [AI] prohibits in-flight refueling and strafing for AIs 541 fixed [scen] map buildings are not destroyed when they should be 540 fixed [debrief][stats] revision of map building destruction detection and statistics code 539 fixed [debrief][stats] ground unit destruction stats error 538 fixed [refuel][M88] CheckRefuelProgress (in progress) 537 mod [loadout][M87] change of logic for the “day” variable: day will always be considered true (even if it's not in the loadout). However, if you want ONLY a night loadout, set this: night = true, and day = false, 536 mod [date][M86] new variables added to conf_mod (RepairOption, current_date, weather, etc.) 535 fixed [generator][inter] choosing interceptor causes mission generation to crash 553.zip

I think it's more important to get much more AI aircraft and units into DCS World. We have plenty of flyable aircraft. But that's perhaps another discussion

You have to go to your profile and then attachments and delete unwanted/unused attachments to free some space again.

@NineLine could you please take a look at this? Thank you.

I just did it a second ago. Landed with center tank attached. 6,800lbs of fuel left yet. Opened AR door, called for refuel, center tank still attached, 7,300lbs of fuel. Unless it takes more time to depressurize the tank. I do it right before rearming. Unless it takes more time then I will start opening the AR door as soon as I land and start taxiing to a parking spot. Let me give that a try quick.

They didn't say it,but they showed some pictures.I know it's probably AI,but there is no information about M3 Zero now,I'm very confused. From https://www.facebook.com/100057409782744/posts/1302731340292672/?substory_index=1302731340292672 From 2024 and beyond video From 2025 and beyond video From F4U-1D launch video

OK I have just update the Nvidia driver, which adds another factor. Monty tried 300fps, then back to 120 fps and back at 72hz more stutters than at 90.... Just went online on the Mayhem server(4Ya UK aerobatics) and no stutters to 45 degrees from forwards, however beyond that quite a few. Out for the evening now, will pick up tomorrow.. Suggestions welcome.

Great concept! Really glad to see an upcoming F-14 campaign too. Day 1 buy for me.

Greetings. I sent you a message if you're able to read it. Thanks.

@JSF_Aggie Absolutely fantastic work by you and your son! I'm incredibly jealous of your son's fusion 360 skills (something I'm working on myself). As a fellow SimFab owner, I would absolutely love to recreate what you've done here...particularly the pedestal portion of the setup as I will be using a touchscreen monitor and Helios to replicate a number of different aircraft. Is there any chance that you and your son would be willing to share your design plans so that I could replicate what you've done? That said, thank you so much for sharing your work. I always appreciate seeing the hard work and creativity of others in this community. Best of luck to him at college this fall!

Aerial torpedoes has implemented and working on Ju-88T AI unit from some years ago, the problem has talked, the associated funtionality, but a very missing weapon on DCS has none Depth charge / antisubmarine weapons. ED has planned by the PTO Assets pack some capable torpedo carriers: TBF “Avenger” (Mk-13 torpedoes and DC missing). PBY “Catalina” (Mk-13 and Mk-24 Fido torpedoes, retroboms and DC missing). B6N “Jill” (Type 91 torpedoe missing).

Does it not work with the supercarriers or maybe I just don’t know how to do it anymore? I was using CVN 72, taxied into position, lowered the launcher, pressed the bind which I think was U, but nothing happened.

In other words, it's pretty important stuff to work out and get right in a world of Jills, Avengers, and Catalinas.

Yes I slid it to 70 fps I have it also at 90fps in Nvidia controls app under the DCS tab. @madmonty I will try more experimentaton with that later.....