All Activity

Hello ! Any hints of a dev for Mi-24P ? Thanks

I'm just posting what I did in the hope that it helps you: Get the right hub. I've settled on this one: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0C9WT79W4?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title&th=1. Check the specs about data transfer on the item description (look at the images of the ports too). It's made of metal too and feels solid. If your PC has a USB C port, you need to use it for this hub. I opted for this cable and then attached a USB C plug into the charging port which then goes to an Alexa compatible plug. I can tell Alexa to turn the VR charging on or off as needed. https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0BRQHN5MY?ref=ppx_yo2ov_dt_b_fed_asin_title&th=1. Everything is running smoothly with my Quest 2 again. I'm hoping it will help those of you with a Quest 3.

It’s also why a FF and FC level modelling of the very same aircraft can still feel very different even though they both use PFM: the impact of FF system modelling is not to be underestimated

I've been familiar with the behaviour of the Mig-29 since the super-sexy FM was introduced to the FC3 version, but I always thought the 'bucking' was simply down to an aircraft blessed with an excess of nose authority getting caught in a series of mini-stalls. It was only when I looked down yesterday and saw what the stick was doing that there was another ingredient.

We already have plenty of subsonic trainers in DCS, an F35 Block 1A/B would objectively be the worst.

Мог соврать. В BMSовском мануале, которому я думаю в таких вещах можно верить, только про CCIP.

If only people flew the FC version of the plane, there would be like 95% less questions

Do you have any difficulty contorting your thumb for the controls, or reaching around the brake lever?

good to know!

Ciao secondo l’introduzione di aerei o singolo aereo italiano , della seconda guerra mondiale sarebbe bene accetto ? un bel macchi 202 o 205 il g55 il re 2005 darebbe linfa all’utilizzo di mappe della seconda guerra. io sto aspettando (ovviamente gli aerei italiani) lo zero giapponese. cosa ne pensate ? grazie ciao

In this year or in next?

Ye, would be interesting

I had to make a different profile especially for MiG-29 as this behaviour would rip the stick out of my hands: it is that violent. So I see the exact same thing you do (as per your video above) even though my physical stick and the virtual stick are indeed connected. I had always heard the real MiG-29 has very strong stick forces so it's not a surprise that my Rhino needed some toning down, or the overheat-protection would turn on even while doing simple free flights and landing practice

For those interested with Russian cockpit in the MiG-29, I created these references. I tried to discuss the meaning of each symbol more in details in these articles about the HUD and the SPO-15LM. For those who start from scratch, I even tried to make a short intro to Cyrillic alphabet. I'd be more than happy if any Russian native speaker were willing to check them! Thanks

I FIXED IT BY BUYING A5070TI

@baltic_dragon I've revisited this campaign and am getting the same style of error in the first 6 missions: namely the map and other aircraft being shifted away from where the MFD is saying they are. So, I can see the other three aircraft on my wing, but the MFD datalink shows them 20nm ahead. I type in the MGRS coords (good example is M6) of the ZSU-23 site we're hitting and my pod slews to open ground in the middle of nowhere (and yes I CZ'd and double checked the MGRS - I even used my own converter and put in another waypoint using lat/long). However, the MFD shows the cross of my pod bang on the expected position on the map even though the pod is actually looking miles away. In the screenshot I managed to grab you can see the other aircraft and the MFD showing them to be miles away. Can time acceleration cause this issue, as I use that all the time. Spankle

For myself personally.

This next update looks absolutely terrific. Thanks for dealing with several long standings issues and adding incredible detail! Low countries next?;) Just kidding- many thanks!

Für mich persönlich.

Лично для себя.

40 on the deck and 1 on the lift, going down. Part of a 3 Carrier group, practice landing mission. ..

Где можно почитать, что у Вайпера именно в CCRP используется наклонная дальность от РЛС?

By design and for obvious reasons it probably should not go that high.

It's a very interesting description. Is the project still relevant? Unfortunately, the pictures are no longer visible. Could you give me more information?

it’s always nice to know what’s behind a nickname, but I tkink he was referring to @Someone