All Activity

So after many years of waiting and hoping we finally get to see 4th gen FF model for RED side (MiG-29A) and i believe that this is first one and last one to be introduced in DCS as of now, maybe this will change but time will tell us. So starting from "Simulation", after we got announcement that MiG-29A is around corner, we also have info that there is going to be implementation of physics for SPO-15LM and how it will detect signals based on physics, right after that we also now have R-27R/ER in Advanced model and so much more, which i like and i support you doing it, BUT biggest issue now comes with F jets as they DON'T have such Advanced models for example AIM-7 and 120s and same issue is with their RWRs as it makes no difference from FC3 F-15C in accuracy and not even close to such advanced way as SPO-15LM and starting from there we can see who is winner. So my question is. Are we going to see same Super Advanced modeling on F jets and their RWRs, Radars, Weapons and so on? And when can we expect such thing?

Adter you get the RTB ut is complete, also thete is key command to show you the score of a mission, if that is 100 then you are good. Keep in mind that it takes a second to compile all the events.

Also, what is definitely broken is the message about an incompatible loadout for loadouts that are perfectly legitimate. See the example in the screenshot. Again, I don't know whether it's a problem only on my setup or not. But this one I am absolutely certain is not a problem with how I use DCS.

I've tested again and there are two vessel indeed. It's just that the moving thick smoke nearby attracted my attention and I thought that was a submarine with defective diesel engines. (There's literally only smoke from under water without actually unit)

Thanks; another way to test this would be for your software engineers to intentionally modify the angleUp/angleDown values significantly and incorrectly, to make sure that that moves the HUD to the 'wrong' place, by the amount and direction matching the changes. Of course would need to be careful not to actually ship that change - just for testing

I put in oversized bearings to take up the space. 13x6x4mm (ODxIDxW) bearings are perfect and fit nice and snug in the cut out of the force sensor. If you are super handy or have a lathe you can cut your own bushings out of bronze or some other material.

Hi Bankler, the team just tested your mission and it seems to be working for us.

Have you watched the tutorial? In my opinion, the advantage of saving them in the DTC is that it allows you to create a route that includes the previously defined RSBNs (maximum 3). Another advantage is that it seems to me that the computer will point directly to the first of these points when starting the mission.

F-14?

The Chair Mount - Collective Base Adapter it's compatible with the Sihoo chair?

The graphics inside the cockpit didn't blow me away, but all in all it looks like an exciting frame to fly.

Superb

Hello, I have booked your product, convinced that it will be an excellent module. I would like to ask you if you have planned support for Leap or, at least, if you could consider implementing it. Thank you in advance for your feedback.

at the moment, no fix is required, it is working as intended. But as mentioned I will pass on the feedback. thank you

When I landed after mission 1, the player says that he's taxing to S-39 and S-40 (for the wingman). I taxied to spot 39 (there's no S on the map), and shut down the jet. Still no message that the mission is completed. My wing(wo)man was taxiing all over to the other side of the airport along with some F-15s, so I thought maybe that was the de-arming area. So I started up my jet again to taxi to the other side and parked along my wingman, shut down. Still no message/cue that the mission was over. So I just quit, and found out that my mission was a success. So I guess the mission is completed once you land back at Andersen, or?

Thanks for the support. Yes, please fix it for the Apache for this guy too.

I will certainly pass on your feedback, however this is not a bug. thank you

The same logic should apply to the Apache IHADSS (you're not wrong, but it seems they've not gone that route).

Hi, At the moment that's not going to happen at least not very soon. Still not totally impossible. First I should make it clear for myself what kind of changes that would need.

Be that as it may, the better our MiG-29's FM reflects the real bird, quirks and oddities included, the more I like it It's quite possible that this specific roll tendency is something that's actually not present in the real aircraft and will be addressed in a future FM update - but if it is, we'll learn to deal with it

You'd have to dial DCS's FFB down to "0" in the controler menu(FF Tune) then it will work. My FFB-Stick still works after I did that. Just turn down DCS's FFB output

You have invulnerability set either in options or in the mission.

Hello, the module is great but HMS as a 3d model popping up infrom of your eye in VR looks ridiculous and lead to visual dissonance. You do realise that most of VR is just a flat image with infinite focal length. In real life there is no way we can focus on the HMS sight metal frame. It should be represented as a smeared semitrasparent black shape. Exactly like you did in Ka-50 for example. Please fix it so my eye won't try to focus on nonexistent 3d object. Super uncomfortable. Thanks for your attention.

thanks, will follow.