All Activity

Hello and thank you FIVE years into the future with the same issue :)

yep...is just another PCI card... it will significantly improve your FPS on the same settings , especially if you combine it with a new processor

They do! No you need each block, and then apply Bagel's fix pack

IF(!) your motherboard (likely with the latest bios update if ever) does support 5000 series CPUs, you will most likely see "a" benefit. Unless that is, you are otherwise severley bottlenecked. Generally speaking, CPU, GPU and RAM should be somewhat in line with each other. Make 100% sure you MoBo DOES support the CPU you are aiming for. The same Socket alone isn't a guarantee. how much RAM do you have and what is your GPU?

I have an ASUS Prime A320M-K motherboard, am considering doing some upgrades to my machine but have to be selective due to price. I already have 32GB RAM, M.2 nVME storage and a GeForce RTX 2070 (8GB)-based graphics card. Hoping to soon upgrade CPU to something like a Ryzen 9 5950X. Is it as simple as swapping out the 2070 card for a new-to-me (second hand), thinking something like a 3080Ti 12GB? I use a HP Reverb 2 VR - will such a graphics card swap result in better graphics in VR or is it the VR headset that is limiting? (it is mainly things like spotting ground vehicles/ground scenery that I find difficult). thanks for any info

Hello; I have an ASUS Prime A320M-K motherboard (AM4 socket) currently with a Ryzen7 1700X processor... possibly thinking about putting in another AM4 socket processor - something like a Ryzen 9 5950X or similar, hoping it will be just a straight swap although I will also put in a water cooler AIO type arrangement as machine gets hot when playing DCS. Is it as simple as swapping an AM4 for an AM4 -socket CPU? And will I notice any difference playing DCS with a better CPU? thanks for any advice

Having some issues with mission 6 Problem i'm running into is after making it to the al bab and shooting all targets surrounding the zone it tells you to engage an AA gun, after engaging the AA gun it gives you a congratulatory message and then afterwards there are no new enemies, no new messages via the radio and after flying around for like 30 minutes scanning for targets i ended up just flying back to the base. There is an F10 option to REARM at a FARP but the FARP control measure is not in the briefing or in the preset control measures. Perhaps there is a trigger at the FARP i'm unable to access/find or is it possible the FARP just does not exist at all? Anyhow i ended up just going RTB and drawing is there something i'm missing or is the mission currently broken?

Yes: Few examples:

Is it just the Bagel Fixpack that is needed?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_air_navigation_system Now you know why a $150 solution isn't viable for a military purposes. In same time F-16C implement ILS quite well and is only bc it lands exclusivly on land airfields and just uses what is already available.

Big time ups.

Go on, what's the worst that can happen.

Would you like that estimated in weeks?

Hi, I would like to ask you not to start discussions here. Please use other discussion threads for that. I would like to establish a collection/point of contact for Mig-29 videos for the (FF) Mig-29 module.

How far are we from release?

Thanks Stuart. I'll check them out. Do they have a spoken instructor? I'm sill curious to hear whether my memory is playing tricks or if there used to be official Maverick TMs for the Hornet!

This is definitely a C. The main difference among both of them is, that C has 2 cannons on each wing, while B has only one. C would also come in handy, because it has additionally 4 racks for rockets or smaller bombs on both wings.

Hoss, the module never had separate push-to-talk command, so I'm surprised it was picking up your VA in the first place . Should be no changes here. I'm away from my gaming rig so can't check implemented changes now, but reading other threads, I can see it's going to be a challenging experience.

you said key binding, did you also check the axis ?

Hi mate , if you haven't tried them , the below are bloody great , and whilst not quite what you asked for i think broadly covers it , they are a campaign series of 4 "campaigns" and fixes by Bagel.. they got me back into the hornet again Gunthrek Academy: F/A-18 Hornet - Bagel Fixpack Edition Gunthrek Academy: F/A-18 Hornet | Block 1: Basic Navigation and Air to Ground Operations Gunthrek Academy: F/A-18 Hornet | Block 2: Air to Ground Gunthrek Academy: F/A-18 Hornet | Block 3: Air to Air Gunthrek Academy: F/A-18 Hornet | Block 4: Carrier Operations

In my DCS/Mods/Aircraft folder, I have 2 F-5E related folders, i.e. 'F-5E' and 'F-5E 2024'. Yet, in Saved Games, etc. there is still just the one - F-5E. Is it safe to delete the F-5E folder in Mods/Aircraft? As things stand, I get 2 x missions showing in DCS.

Taking the Risk Estimate Distances from official docs like the JFIRE is certainly the best way to answer your question. 10% PI and 0,1% PI were the two common thresholds in the past. You'll see that later versions use new references with 0.1% PI standing/prone/prone protected. You'll note also that values changed along time, taking into account newer studies and operational experience. In any case, it will give you realistic values for all types of western weapons effects.

Been away form the Hornet for a long time and wanted to get back into it. So, I decided to have a refresher and go back over the Training Missions. Pretty sure there used to be a couple of Maverick TMs which I don't see any more. Were they removed?

Товарищи, подскажите, что-то менялось с графикой в DCS? Что - то как-то все такое чёткое и сглаженное в ВР стало (недельку, полторы) не заходил

I think weather vaning due to wind on the ground is too strong when taxiing. It is almost impossible to turn away from the wind (even with diffential braking and power), then the fuselage will snap around. Either that, or the tail wheel castering is not loose enough. Cheers! Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk