All Activity

Wondering is there a way to set the max frame rate to 72, to match my VR headset. The GUI only allows increments of 5. ?

they do just what every major game developer has been doing for the last 15 years; one should be happy about the fact they dont do micro transactions, but at the very least you see results in a month by month basis, AND they keep the update roadmap transparent. Id rather learn the half baked modules on a cup-by-cup basis rather than the whole firehose all at once.

good that is what i get here. you may want to submit a support ticket. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/support/

+1 And yet here we have ED releasing half baked modules like there is no tomorrow. I have eated enough half bakering to not buy anythng else

Non-authoritative answer: Name: api.digitalcombatsimulator.com Address: 185.195.197.20

Sorry, but what does Virpil has to do with K51 collective?

Weird hill to die on, but OK. https://www.dvidshub.net/video/670167/balikatan-2019-marines-execute-forward-arming-and-refueling-point-farp-training https://www.dvidshub.net/image/5239500/balikatan-2019-marines-execute-forward-arming-and-refueling-point-operations-farp https://www.alamy.com/us-marine-corps-1st-lt-susan-plunkett-conducts-pre-flight-checks-in-a-kc-130j-super-hercules-at-clark-air-base-philippines-april-4-2019-during-exercise-balikatan-balikatan-is-an-annual-exercise-between-the-us-and-the-philippines-and-comes-from-a-tagalog-phrase-meaning-shoulder-to-shoulder-representing-the-partnership-between-the-two-countries-the-exercise-promotes-regional-security-and-humanitarian-efforts-for-us-allies-and-partners-plunkett-is-a-kc-130j-super-hercules-pilot-with-marine-aerial-refueler-transport-squadron-152-image243730467.html https://www.dvidshub.net/image/9216078/wyoming-air-national-guardsmen-push-bales-hay-out-back-c-130-hercules-aircraft https://www.919sow.afrc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/2626009/5th-sos-tests-new-aircrew-mask-for-c-130-enterprise/fbclid/5th-sos-tests-new-aircrew-mask-for-c-130-enterprise/ https://www.ang.af.mil/News/Features/Article/863882/becoming-a-c-130-pilot-or-combat-systems-officer-in-the-air-national-guard/

what are your results in NSLOOKUP for api.digitalcombatsimulator.com?

The remote indicator magnetic compass is misleading to read, because the needle is high above its plate. So from the typical pilot perspective you read its projection on the plane from a diagonal perspective. If the needle points to 180, you are likely to read it as 185. If it is 000 you are likely to read it as 355, etc. Move your head around in the cockpit and you will see. The way to use the RI compass is NOT to read the needle - you rotate the arrow to the direction you want to keep, then hold the needle parallel to the arrow. You will notice it is not exactly on top of the arrow because of the perspective issue, but parallel is parallel from any perspective. And yes, it is super annoying that this compass only works when you are perfectly level. The gyro compass does not drift very much, so I use it most of the time, except on long cruises where I use the above method with the RI compass.

I've been going through posts and replies back and forth and it seems there is no direct response from the Devs if the water injected WEP is modeled or not. A bunch of folks are simply guessing based off the the instruments' read outs and the devs are silent. So a question to @-Rudel-: can you please clarify: - Is Water Injected WEP modeled ? - if it is indeed Modeled: how do you actually reliably engage it?

its easy, they should list all 3rd parties involved, but they are not doing it. Take your conclusions.

Great... Now I need to somehow find a way to add a yoke to my already way too complicated DCS simrig

I waiting to hear from the devs too - there are bugs in training and mission. See my earlier post. I really wanted to train on this module. Not hearing answers from the dev. I also do not want to see posts like the update is coming. I saw all the other posts in the forum, that they have been posted for a while and I just do not know what is going on. If it didn't sell well, then the devs must come and out say it. I bought it based on their dev's name for fsx/p3d models fame. I am weary of their new upcoming module...there will be support in initial years but if you buy it few years later and the module just sits there...I get the feeling that has happened to me with this module. I could be completely wrong also once I hear from the devs.

well if that were true, then ED could be privy to a class action lawsuit IMO. As much as Id like to agree with you, I dont think thats the case.

But you do realize you're replying to a post two years later? So, let me tell you from experience, we calibrate on MK and then switch to GPK. At least that's how it is for us.

Makes total sense. I just thinking getting it in front of the airline crowd would be good for the module and DCS.

You will see. Dont worry.

Sorry.

Have restarted things many times. East coast. I don't run into this issue with the admin account on the server which is weird.

It will happen again, you know why? Because the statement about all 3rd parties should sign the file sharing policy since 2018 is a LIE.

If I don't care neither does the developer? Are you posting just to post? What does that even mean? Cry more. My discussion with the hoi polloi is resolved. Hence /thread.

The reason ralfidude and some others have it is they have had the alpha for a while to make tutorials and stuff but was under embargo until pre-sale kicked off. He just had the most complete thing at that point and was able to get out there first. Otherwise there'd be no way he and his crew bro would be that proficient on the FMS and flying the airplane as they are. They've clearly had it for a while to get to that skill level.

Ohhh i'm fulling tracking.

Your comments here are insulting many people and with relatively low knowledge of the subject. If you don't care, the developer doesn't care either. The best you can do is politely ask, that's all. You even marked your reply as resolved. That's really lol.

Buddy if you think that this is "wasting 56$" on a "gamble" for a DCS module, then you are not ready for this tier of flight simming. You're not even a flight slimmer until you "gamble" $400 on a ffb joystick base that only has two youtube reviews. Either take the 30% off now or wait two years (maybe more) to see the same price during a sale.