All Activity

quick mission>refueling

Do you have more informations? What tanker? Which mission? Anything else to add? Can you also upload a short track showcasing the issue?

even without using any of x1-4 level of zoom on the Sniper pod. the image quality on Narrow FOV still feels lackluster. In its current implementation The only quality image IMO is with XR processing mode but it requires an area or point track and multiple seconds for the image to process so it cannot be slewn around all the time without the image looking like a blurry mess.

@Weed89 watch this video and it will tell you how to get the Tango https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdqoourYGw8

If the intent is to showcase DCS modules, how about integrating the DCS: NS 430 in the same way as for the Mi-8 - a selectable option, but built in rather than the ungainly free-floating option currently available. All the hooks to key-binds are already made, all the nav logic exists and is external to the model, it literally is just the integration as a 3D object -& while you're re-building the whole model seems the perfect time to do it. It would vastly improve the attractiveness / utility of the module as an intro while being a credible but non-classified upgrade for regular users.

Nachdem du das im ED-Discord geschrieben hattest, wollte ich das gleich ausprobieren und habe es erstmal nicht hinbekommen. Wie es dann letztlich für mich klappt ist in der CDU: IDX <-START COORD REF : MGRS Dann kann ich beispielsweise in der FPLN Page MGRS-Koordinaten eingeben; die Anzeige der Koordinaten wird dann aber direkt in Lat/Long geändert. Bei der Eingabe scheint der Grid Zone Designator im Moment eine Pflichteingabe zu sein, aber bei den Ziffern geht von 2 bis 10 Stellen alles, das ist ganz nice (ja Hornet, dich gucke ich schief an, mit deinem "6 Stellen. Immer. Außer du hast PRECISE geboxt. Dann 10. Immer." Unsinn). Also das alles sind erlaubte Eingaben bzw. Formate: 38TLM16 38TLM1267 38TLM123678 38TLM12346789 38TLM1234567890 Diese hier ist (jedenfalls aktuell) NICHT gültig: LM123678 (GZD fehlt) Sehr nice! Und Bignewy meinte vorhin im Discord, er will mal nachhaken, ob die Eingabe des Luftdrucks (BARO SET) vielleicht auch mal angegangen werden kann.

2 F-16s constantly change their positions with each other and align themselves with the tanker's boom. they not taking fuel. just change their positions over and over again. so i cannot take fuel.

Уважаемые подписчики и друзья, Все краткие анонсы обновлений теперь содержатся в наших еженедельных новостных письмах (рассылка) и дублирующихся в соотв. ветке форума https://forum.dcs.world/topic/93815-dcs-oficialnye-novosti-i-anonsy Детальные подробности и списки изменений вы всегда сможете найти на нашем сайте https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/ru/news/changelog/ Спасибо!

Have you tried turning off virtualization technology in UEFI? Also if you want to narrow it down a lot more, rename your saved games folder and generate a new one. Dont delete the old one, just rename it. Delete the new one if this doesnt solve anything. After that, youll have to one by one replace folders from one to the other until problems start appearing again.

In my opinon the Litning pod should be downgraded. There is no other option in my opinon. The perfect picture though all digital zooms and slew movements is far unrealistic for the AN/AAQ-28. I think realism was the main aspect which differents DCS from other sims like warthunder etc. Sorry for the old eyes or the planes which dont have the sniper pod. But the F16 has its limits as every other planes has this limites. And the F16 should have the most advanced pod in DCS with the AN/AAQ-33. I we all agree with that. To leave a less capaple pod IRL overpowered in this game because some people would be furios is the wrong way when you say "as real as it gets". DCS should be a simulation and when it must be downgraded because of DCS is progressing this is the way to go. If you dont want it, there are many other sims that dont have this claim!

want to try this..BUT, says i need TANGO mod ?? what/where is a TANGO mod to be found?? did not even see it listed as a needed mod

but this is ED we are talking about, so we can make any unreasonable demand that strikes our imagination, like asking for a map to be rebuilt as an "update" ie at no extra cost to the customer, or else the map will be tagged as "abandoned" … the fact that it works on the current version of DCS is incidental and it does not prevent it from being called "abandoned" … sometimes the entitlement of some DCS users really leave one without words

So we took out all the bad guys and Task Force Zues secured the airfield, time to RTB. Half way back to the next WP I get a message saying TFZ have taken severe damage and the mission is failed. I cry out in frustration and rage quit the mission without landing, debrief screen says mission successful and i got 90, probably would've got 100 if I'd landed. Might need to have a look at the triggers or whatever going on here, its a bit bugged

But you definitely would be able to tell if you digital zoomed it in by 9x and started looking at a 57x57 image instead. Digital zoom of that degree makes a massive difference at this lower end of resolutions. I'm quite used to how bad even the 2x digital zoom on the -14 and the -15E LANTIRN pods are.

You can download the file I attached and place it in your folder then.

Yes you can do it with the Warthog but not the SU-25. Sorry if that wasn't clear.

the 4x4 MFD is supposed to be 524x524 not 256x256. https://www.astronautics.com/pdf/product_brochures/F-16_4-Inch_MFD.pdf even so like these videos others have posted of MFD recordings ( so not stretched from recording software) i wouldn't be able to tell they were 500 something pixel image. when you have small displays you dont need as high resolution. anyone who has actually tried to sport any noticable difference for thier nakeyed between 1080p and 1440p on thier 7-8 inch smartphone screens will know this is true.

Just some Sea Eagles, rockets and iron bombs, that’s all it really needs! Looking forward to whenever this comes to fruition.

Thanks, I also saw on the Afghanistan map, I will bring it to the team to see if there is anything that can be done.

Hi, If you have found no profile updated on internet you should follow instruction shown in this original post hoping it still working. l really enjoy it when was working fine with F14A. But since my last post l face issue it running l did not get new try and have more trouble because begin of the year l lost 40' screen so ldk how things go today. Currently l m working on homemade support screens but l did not have time to finish it lately. Hope it will work for you. Good luck

That's why I say that what was supposed to be the best choice in DCS has become useless. The avionics and features are all great with AN/AAQ-33, but the optics aren't what they should be. since it is currently impossible to downgrade AN/AAQ-28, I propose that at least in this respect the image should not be worse, so that it would be a compromise.

DLSS, MSAA, doesn't make a difference. Exported displays are near useless for the MMS.

Hello, I know, wrong forum but I didn't seem to be getting any exposure in the input device forum. Thank you. Just upgraded my warthog to TQS and AVA base for stick. Everything works as should except for one thing. The RDR/CURSOR ENABLE button on the middle of the hat does not "ENABLE" the target in the F-16 like it should. It is mapped correctly, stock DCS mapping and I have verified that the button is actually alive via TM settings. Even the keyboard action of "ENTER" in DCS doesn't work. Therefore I am unable to lock up a radar target for AIM120 use. Any thoughts? Am I missing something stupid like, Turn The Radar ON? I don't ever remember doing that but when in Dogfight mode, I see NO RDR at the top of the HUD. Thank you

ну обзор мышью я еще понимаю. Но как джойстиком курсором управлять - с практической точки зрения , даже не представляю. обзор мышью ЕМНИП - двойной щелчок по ролику мыши. но все таки для обзора лучше купить какой нибудь трекер.

HTCC is an alternative hand tracking implementation for DCS World. It: reduces immersion: hand models won't line up and should be disabled (see instructions) improves practicality: drastically reduces the chances of accidentally triggering switches, which frequently leads to accidentally ejecting, turning off fuel pumps, or pulling fire handles Download here: https://github.com/fredemmott/HTCC/releases/latest Then read: https://htcc.fredemmott.com/getting-started.html Highlights Improved compatibility and reliability, including SteamVR added basic report on OpenXR usability added option to fix basic Ultraleap issues (including the hand tracking module for the OG Pimax Crystal) added option to enable/disable the suspend/hibernate gesture completely rewritten settings app Please note: While SteamVR itself supports hand tracking, most SteamVR headsets and drivers do not HTCC is limited by DCS's 'absolute mouse' support (e.g. like a touchscreen or tablet). HTCC's in-game experience will never substantially improve. Requests for improved hand tracking experience should be sent to the game developers, and should be asking for improved hand tracking - not for improved HTCC support. HTCC is a workaround; everything it does could - and should - be done at least as easily and at least as well in the game itself. I do not provide any support for HTCC on these forums. See https://htcc.fredemmott.com/getting-help.html