All Activity

Коды от 1111 до 1788 условно описывают частоту повторения импульсов лазерного излучения. Длина волны - это другое и от кодов няз не зависит. У апч не лазерно-лучевое командное, а полуактивное наведение на отраженный сигнал. Х-25 по идее должно быть возможно наводить на лцу апача, но как-то надо понять куда направить ракету чтобы она увидела отраженный сигнал. Поиска лазерного пятна на Шквале няз нет.

No chance. Grom missile is not correct for MiG-21Bis either. No MiG-21 radar could guide that missile, as well as MiG-29. Their role is intercept, nothing to do with precision strike. Only conventional "dumb" ordinance.

Полетел бомбить оппонентов, в районе цели поставил ППМ, решил с помощью радара, найти цели и по ним отбомбить. При подлёте к целям (около 20 миль), а это достаточно большие здания, на радаре, при самом высоком его разрешении, видно только мешанину непонятно чего. В итоге по карте F10, "снял" координаты с цели(одного из зданий), по-быстрому забил стирпоинт в ICP и вопрос решил. Уважаемые вирпилы, подскажите пожалуйста, у F16 на самом деле такой ниочёмный радар по земле, или я чего-то не так делаю? Если так, то какой в нём смысл, зря только страницу на МФД занимает.

aaand fixed, available with the next time HB uploads a build to ED the trigger signal was correctly send to the A2A weapons but the pylon wasnt armed.

I still hold high hopes for the 900ft performance issue some of us have to be resolved. If that happens, it'll be very high on my list of maps I recommend.

For interest sake. The -4 had automatic/manual cowl and oil cooler flaps. ..

Hi already demanded here, I added a map with some airbase in or next to their zone 3 polygon.

Thank you both for your replies, but it really, really shouldn't be this way.

Videos please!

Some may find it unusual that after (many, many) years of DCS enjoyment, I only tried using the Campaign Builder for the first time a few days ago. What I found was shocking and dismaying. I wish to complain in the strongest possible terms regarding the sheer inadequacy of this tool. That the replies I received to a recent forum question about what should be a trivial campaign creation issue involved user-created APIs and delving into the minutae of 3rd party campaign missions just says it all. I won't turn this into an essay about persistent campaign-wide variables and unit status tracking, proper branching support and other essential features for a tool of this nature. Instead I will just point you to what was available in a twenty-six year old product, for an idea of what the functionality a tool of this kind should provide; I'm sure Matt Wagner will be able to provide further details if required. Of course, now it's plainly obvious why all* third party campaigns are, structurally, trivial linear affairs rather than complex, branching and endlessly replayable experiences that, in the hands of talented creators, can rival any dynamic campaign. I think the development effort in creating such a tool would be relatively minor in relation to the enormous benefit it would return in the long run. Certainly I would've put it way ahead of, e.g., the recent very pretty but mostly unnecessary laucher app, in a priority list. * No, not all, but those that aren't involve players writing down codes and jumping through other hoops. And I am continually in awe at what the pro campaign creators produce, especially considering how lacking are the tools at their disposal. Think of what they could achieve with a tool like the one linked to above.

Тем меняется не длина волны, а частота повторения импульсов. В жизни Вихрь нельзя подсветить с другого самолета. Он летит по лучу, то есть ему сразу после пуска нужно попасть в лазерный луч из Шквала и лететь внутри него.

Looks awesome! Would absolutely love an HMAS Tobruk livery, is there a livery template to do this with?

It will be released at September. I feel it in my bones

Apologies for my ignorance but "pre-designate" and "moving targets" is a contradiction in my book. Can someone elaborate what this means? Do I pre-designate a target with an optical sensor (e.g. helmet targeting system)? But why would I then use non-predesignate for stationary targets?

It will not be included in the existing deal, the extra work is quite massive in comparison. Details are unclear at the moment as the B(U) is still out a bit. Focus currently lies on the Early-A. There will be more time to talk about the B(U) later, cheers.

А это неправильно? А вес какой? Температура наружного воздуха?

Вдохновился темой и тоже решил сделать ручку на джой. "Летаю" на "СУ-33" поэтому сделал примерно как там. Изготовление - 3Д печать, шпаклевка, наждачка, грунтовка, покраска.

This is the way.... Seriously. Also, I am not on the latest or second latest version Pimax Play, but rather on version 1.40.4. In this old version of Pimax Play one can not fine adjust Quad views settings - but - Quad views is not enabled in Pimax Play in the Tallmouse Youtube guide above anyway so it doesn't matter. So, no Quadviews box ticked in Pimax Play - but rather installing Mbucchias Quad Views has been a problem solver for me. For those who doesn't know - the video shows how to use this "external" (not Pimax Play version) of Quad Views from Mbucchia and then use the Quad Views companion app from Tallymouse to adjust and fine adjust the Quad views settings. I am probably not on the latest nvidia drivers either, I am using 576.88 - but I don't think that matters much really. But following the Youtube guide above here - what a difference! It seems there are a lot of steps to follow in the video, but it's pretty easy. I skipped the part that makes it possible to launch DCS from the Pimax Play menus - I just start the DCS launcher instead.

Same for all, because on Steam the final price is the discounted EA price already (-20% from future release - after EA - price). Now it's Preorder price (-13% from EA price). https://steamdb.info/app/3164870/

I never wanted to buy Persian Gulf or NTTR due to their 'outdated-ness'. Eventually, I caved in and I am glad I purchased both maps. They were cheap (on sale) and the amount of content you get with them (sometimes at additional cost) is very much worth the price of entry, especially as a singleplayer kind of guy. The training campaign for the A-10CII by Baltic Dragon for the NTTR map and the excellent Operation Persian Freedom for the PG map alone made me happy. However... This summer I traveled to Georgia and I was lucky enough to have a good look at it from the air: it was day and there were no clouds. Suffice to say, Georgia in DCS looks nothing like the real thing. Half of the landmass was not green but steppe, there were rolling hills everywhere, the Caucasus mountain range looked intimidating even from afar, and the terrain in general changed every few miles. In DCS Georgia is that flat, ever-green map that looks basically the same from the Black Sea to the eastern end of the Caucasus mountain range. And don't get me started on Tbilisi: even the rudimentary geography is incorrect. So while the PG and NTTR maps are great despite their shortcomings (southern Iran being a vast patch of emptiness...), the Caucasus really needs redoing from the ground up. It should look much more like the mountain areas in Afghanistan for the northern part and much more like a mix of Germany and Iraq for the heartland. Naturally, I jumped right into a digital airplane when I came back from my travels, and seeing the DCS version of Georgia just made me sad. I honestly think a rework should be strongly considered.

Many thanks @flag02004!

Dumb Question: Can the GROM(Kh-66) from the Mig21 be integrated on the Mig29A, as a precision strike weapon? Just asking, because it is already in the simulation & weapons are made by ED.

Any chance to add vortex shaking (for heli) in Simhaptic in DCS?

Same in Norway 13%