All Activity

More funtionality on the FARP, has on the ED side, no ASC.

Вот так и отношусь. Главное, чтобы следующий модуль был не таким же бесполезным в мультиплэере, относительно текущего синего парка машин.

Bazzite protects you from yourself but it also locks you in when you want to act like a "power user". I'd say to take Nobara (KDE or Gnome, as you prefer) for a spin. It's as close as “Bazzite without restrictions” as it gets right now. It's mutable Fedora base (meaning you can install everything with dnf). It comes with the same game packages and optimizations (Proton GE, DXVK, OBS, MangoHUD, codecs, etc). No crashes - you can tinker with the system, customize everything, compile, etc. More traditional, but equivalent in performance. In practice, “Nobara is what Bazzite would be if it were mutable.” It only lacks automatic rollback and atomic update (which you rarely need).

Just give me an official MH-60 and my life will be complete

I will ask the team to take a look, it seems the choice between AGL and MSL needs a tweak. thank you

Some valuable suggestions here, I would particularly point out BTR-60, T-62, BTR-152, AMX-13 and IFA trucks since they are relevant not only to the East Germany map, but for building scenarios on other maps too (Iraq used IFA trucks, Israel and Argentina used AMX-13, Syria and Egypt had T-62s, BTR-60 were everywhere, etc). I also agree that we should prioritize covering "blind spots" in units, such as: 1. We still don't have SA-4 Krug, used by both Soviets and GDR 2. Cold War era static AAA we have is pretty much limited to ZU-23-2 and S-60. What we can have: - FK20-2 (Rheinmetall Mk 20 Rh-202 autocannon used in anti-air role; can be static or mounted on Unimog truck; there is also two-barrel variant) - M167 VADS - of course, proper L70 Bofors as used by Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, France, UK and many other countries during the Cold War (this one would probably be the easiest to implement since its similar to the WW2 L60 version we have now) - ZPU-4 to give some variety to Redfor, once again used all over the world (including potential Vietnam scenarios) 3. Since we don't have a lot Bluefor SAMs, Crotale? We already have HQ-7 which is very similar. In French service, these were used for airfield defense behind the lines, but as we could (potentially) have French airfields, why not? It is also used by the Gulf states (Saudi Arabia, UAE) which makes it relevant for other scenarios as well.

Специфичная (эвфемизм, да) тема. Хотите палку-нагибалку? Берите F/A-18, вроде он на данном этапе развития сима - самый-самый и вообще имба и не контрится. Хотите полетать на МиГ-29, а не на уфолете с, как коллеги выше писали, прикрученными Амраамами? Берете и летаете. Да, с превозмоганием. Да, против современных крафтов МиГу из 80-х не особо светит. Ищите (или поднимайте сами) серв, где летают с ПАРГСН. Летайте в PvE. Да мало ли, что можно придумать. Разработчики много лет назад в какой-то теме предупреждали, мол, если вирпилам дать реалистично работающую "Березу" - будет вой. Ну вот, не обманули. Разработчики предупреждали, что это будет 9.12, а не что-то более современное. Тоже не обманули. Разработчики раз дцать говорили, что баланс - это не в симуляторе, потому что в нем он априори невозможен. И опять не наврали. Так какой смысл теперь требовать натянуть сову на глобус? Относитесь к покупке своего МиГа, как к инвестиции в последующие красные модули

Are you also planning to rework the Arrow 2/3 system? Back then you said you stop because we didn't have anything else besides Scud, now we have Iskander and ATACMS.

Hi @hannibal, I'm good thanks and hope you are too! I had to poach the parts to use on another project (I'm bad for that) but I plan to build a new version of it Are you still using yours? I recall seeing a youtube video on how to use an older version, but I think the latest version might have had some of the older features removed from it's interface, unless I've overlooked something. There was once a tablet behaviour mode as sell as a general controller mode, but I can't see that in the version I've just updated to. Although I've tried both modes, I prefer the controller mode (if that's what it was called). There are registry settings you can tweak to alter the distance from hand to headset to horizon. Once you get this set right, there's little movement of the cursor when moving your head around and you can literally move switches while looking about. It takes some fiddling to get it right. I haven't quite got the latest version working as well as an older version yet. If you haven't already, check this link and scroll down to "VR Offset" and have a go at tweaking until you get results you're happiest with. https://htcc.fredemmott.com/settings.html HTCC introduces a little bit of cursor lag but I still manage to use it okay. Let us know how it goes

Petro Targeting is broken, After he readies the weapons - you cannot see reticule LastMissionTrack.trk Mi24 Test.trk

More Propeller discrimination, piston persecution or valve vilification we could do without. Never was so much owed to so few by so many. We still need many prop driven vintage beauties and those ‘few’ of us that are on a starvation diet of glycol and AvGas must speak up and stand for what is right and proper. Proper Propeller Procurement is imperative, and pronto. Apologies to the OP for any offence that may have been caused during the course of my post. If you’ve been affected etc get yourselves a nice pot of tea and some comfy slippers. I’ll go and sit on the naughty step with Hoss and anyone else that dares to dream of musty mayhem with vintage vagabonds.

Some good news for you. The point about "slop" was almost certainly because they were using the friction setting to stop the droop. Since that issue was raised to Virpil, they added the counterbalance system, and I believe that it's now part of the unit sold. The counterbalance is basically a spring that can have it's tension adjusted. The adjustment means that you can use different weight grips with the base. Personally I have a Hawk unit. So to setup: Securely mount it Add the grip Reduce the friction to nearly zero Adjust the spring/counterbalance such that there's just a tiny bit of droop Add a spot of friction to stop the tiny bit of droop That results in low friction/stiction, whilst having a collective that won't droop. Hope that helps.

We have outdated NVG in DCS, resolution is terrible, could we get new one as pilots have ? There are great mods for NVGs, but its breaking integrity check, would it be possible to get something that has better resolution than 180p ?

Been mentioned before, but Ka-29TB - pretty much the same weapons as Ka-50, but a 2 seater with troop transport / cargo capabilities - and more than half a dozen built Could serve (as a variant did) as data-linked C&C for Ka-50's Maybe even

Про МиГ и придумывают, как, например, сбитие МиГом F-117 вместо ЗРК.

Sounds good but we already have this tool for years:

можно все что угодно придумать. Правда не найти

I would recommend Bazzite as it's more of a "guarded" OS, and the devs focus on gaming, making the OS more gamer friendly over other distros. The best part of Bazzite is Steam is integrated very well and has Wine and Lutris ready to go out of the box. I am however running CachyOS because Bazzite was too well locked down at the kernel level, and I needed some VM and development tools installed which wouldn't install on Bazzite. But for just gaming and general tools like word processing, art, streaming etc it's great imo. Just note, on both Bazzite and CachyOS, I found if I had lot of my modules installed, the main menu will stutter after loading. It would stutter for a couple of minutes and I haven't found explanation as to why, but it settles and DCS then runs flawlessly. Edit: Having thought about it, I might actually go back to Bazzite as it is a REALLY user friendly OS

Насчёт Эфиопии не знаю, но в Ираке подтверждены не были. По тому же Торнадо: Таким образом, до иранцев ему очень далеко.

As I have mentioned in another post in my opinion we should not expecto to have a fully and unlimited stocked FARP out of a C-130. Same goes with transporting Kiowas. While the Herculas can indeed transport a Kiowa IRL, the preparation time to embark it into the aircraft and the necesary maintenance actions required to unload it and make it airworthy again are beyond the logic of assembling a hasty refueling and rearming point. And that is not a functionality envisioned to be done in a hasty deployed FARP. The Hercules should be able to set up a „limited“ capabilities fueling and rearming point but not the kind of unlimited „airport FARP/HELIPAD“ with spawning aircraft, repair services and unlimited stocks.

At the very least I’d expect visors on aircraft that already have the animation to raise/lower the visor, and the external view of the pilot with a visor: F-5, Mi-24, CH-47. But yes, I personally would love to see it on every single module in DCS, as you say “just like in real life”

There's something wrong with the animation of the sidewinder volume knob ind the early 135-GR. It turns (visually) only to the 12 o'clock position, but it adjusts the volume down further, as if the knob was turned further left.

I fully agree with the above post. We should not have a fully and unlimited stocked FARP out of a C-130. Same goes with transporting Kiowas. While the Herculas can indeed transport a Kiowa, the preparation time to embark it into the aircraft and the necesary maintenance actions required to unload it and make it airworthy again are beyond the logic of assembling a hasty refueling and rearming point. The Hercules should be able to set up a „limited“ capabilities fueling and rearming point but not the kind of unlimited „airport FARP/HELIPAD“.

I´m realy hyped by the fact, that we are getting a ff Eagle. I hope it will be next year. But the F35?

Alla fine quello in oggetto dovrebbe arrivare in entro 15 giorni.