All Activity

Thanks, I still stand by every word there.

Yes

cant wait for northern region too, served in Kunduz 2009. I really hope there will be ANA ANP assets and updated german forces like Dingo, Marder, TPZ (jammer), EOD to CAS some IED sweeps If not ED will make it, i hope some Modders will do it.

The N001 has a TWS mode. However, the outdated weapon control system and R-27 missiles do not allow firing at the target in the TWS.To use the R-77, the weapon control system was replaced and changes were made to the radar algorithm. The 9-13S uses a weapon control system from the more advanced MiG-29M. RLPK-29M, which means firing two targets in the game in STT mode is a bug, as is a single target when using R-77 missiles.

Thanks for a very comprehensive overview. Extremely useful. I find the QP is very comfortable even without an extra strap. I don't use any face gasket so it makes it easier to get the lenses closer to my eyes. The sharpness is excellent so I would not really want to lose the crisp cockpit detail. Although I would prefer a DP connection I don't really notice any compression artefacts. I also have the Rift S and I find the immersion is better with the Quest Pro. I think this is because of the wider FoV and possibly as it is easier to control the binocular overlap. The Rift S feels like looking through a letter box when compared with the QP. I guess some of this comes down to head shape, relative eye position etc. I think I will stay with the QP for now.

Hunter, Sea Vixen and Lightning most likely have no market share, Buccaneer is closer, Jaguar could make some money as DCS module, and Tornado is in development. Brit Harrier have to be delivered by RB, they at least have FM for it, but again, GR would be just either too similar, or too limited to current AV-8B, while FRS no matter what particular era we pick, doesnt strike me as fun module, unless you are SA map enthusiast and like to recreate history in DCS. Old FRS is propably more fitting DCS, some niche for CW interceptor, butt with just aim-9L and unguided a2g it would have hard time making it competetive, both pve and pvp. IRL it was fighting against 2nd gen fighters...

hi,would you like to make a Iowa class 1991 in DCS?I think it will be really fun in our game!

В мануале условием для ACT PFZ является не только наличие активной зоны, но еще и наличие списка целей FCR, либо своих, либо полученных по даталинку. В целом если нужен поиск в каком-то небольшом квадрате - хватает OWN PFZ.

В сентябрьском обновлении, скорее всего. Видео с холодным запуском - хорошая примета ))

I'm not sure which wing root painting would be better The long black stripes or the short black stripes? Although I think the short one makes the Falcon look a bit fatter... I have also being working on the paint gaps for the gun fairings... As well as adding one more country to the roster... Which other detail should I change around? Which livery set should I release first?

By the way, i can see that your are using the Pfp3n and it confirm that it works on this device too ! ( I was not able to test on this one ) . I'm not sure the "UFC radio report" is that useful on the AH64D, as you have this directly in front of you as a pilot . but leaving the keyboard display alone was "strange" . If you have any / suggestion let me know with direct message.

Так когда его выпустят?

DCS: R&R? DCS: Retired Aviator?

As a mod developer, I found a clear issue/bug as below: When using For loop to create a lot object on MFD/HUD/HMD and DCS crash silently(without any log clue) in VR, but will work correctly in none-VR. Especially when creating EHSI\EADI , usually pre-create a lot line/dash/text to simulator vertical/speed/HDG which contains hundreds of objects.

+1, good idea.

Yep, for me its 3 weeks to release. 17-18.09 sounds good.

В чём это проявляется? Или, скажем, откуда вам известно, где сейчас разработчики?

Thanks

So, any timeline so far?

"the E's represent excellence awards for different areas of your operations" you will find all in the net

Может быть и так. Видел недавно в файлах пользователей кто-то выкладывал, вероятно решили пришить ему официально. Но МиГ-21 летает по своей системе, у него свой собственный скрипт с логическими данными о маяках, в то время как Ми-24П и Л-39 используют глобальный скрипт карты, которые непосредственно и вшиты в саму карту и такие маяки физически отображаются в редакторе. Поэтому вопрос к недоработке карты ещё открыт.

As Sleighzy said. QVFR is very different.

Confirmed. My problem is caused by DLAA. Thanks.

Hello everyone! I am very curious to know what aircraft you are flying at this moment. With so many modules in DCS and more to be released, I thought it would be fun know! Feel free to post pictures I am currently flying the F-4E Phantom and AJS-37 Viggen because of the intresting cold war design philosophy & technology going on. I love deploying those AGM 62- Walleye, GBU-8 Hobos, RB-04E and RB-15F!

One thing people can do atleast with FF is switch the ARU as they like. So you could say, potentially move it into “Hard” where each trim press will move stabilizer as little as possible. I just am not sure if the way it is adjusted is 2 position, easy or hard. Or if the two positions allow you to make small adjustments if actuated shortly.