All Activity

Hi shadowborn, I can not answer your questions about ASC website, I am sure they will when they see your post. But to answer your question about if buying from the 3rd party developer or ED direct matters, it does not, ultimately ED are the ones that issue the key to the third party. I hope that helps answer at least part of your question. best regards bignewy

What is your reason for thinking that way? ED makes assets for all eras and only WW2 packs are currently done or planned as paid add-ons.

AND is implicit. If you have like: Condition1 Condition2 That means Conditon1 AND Condition2 If you have it like: Condition1 OR Condition2 That means Condition1 OR Condition2 Fun stuff comes with combos Condition1 Condition2 OR Condition3 Means (Condition1 AND Condition2) OR Condition3

The A/A requires FC3 while the A/G uses the SU25T. So Dave should be able to fly the A/G variant.

don't know if anyone could help with this, didn't know where else to post it. start DCS, get to the end of the cloud loading screen and then it always minimises down to task bar. clicking re opens but i never have any menu sound then. game will play fine with all sounds, so no prob there, but would be nice to get the menu music back and stop the minimizing, very very rarely it will stay up, and i have the menu music, its an MSI monitor and desktop

Ютуб иногда зло, сколько дублей они сделали за экраном, прежде выложить красивое видео - никто не знает. Я смотрел одного такого как он в стриме тренировался подпирал параметры пуска, а позднее выложил красивое видео - один пуск - одно попадание.

Hey guys, I'd need some help here... I set up a deep strike mission and want an SA-10 to go active when I'm within its radius AND above a certain altitude. So basically I can fly through its firing range by going low without activating it. I set up a trigger zone correspondingly to its firing range and a trigger 'within zone' OR 'unit above x feet'. Obviously that won't work because the 'within zone' condition will trigger it active anyways. What I'd need is an AND option not OR. I'm sure there is a workaround... just not seeing it. Thanks in advance!

The disadvantage of the 9950X3D is that is has two compute-chiplets, and one of them is not suitable for gaming. So you can have issues if the game decides to run (partially) on the wrong chiplet. That is why you see people messing about with Process Lasso, to manually decide what runs where. With the 9800X3D, you don't have these issues. The downside is that you have fewer cores, but almost no games use that many cores, so this is more an issue when you also want to use the CPU for heavy video/image editing and such. So the 9950X3D is more of a hybrid CPU, whose primary value is that it is both good for gaming, but also for heavy video/image editing, etc. If money is no object, I would still get the 9800X3D, so you don't have any hassle, and then save your money for a CPU upgrade later on. Rumor has it that the next generation of AMD CPUs may see much reduced memory latency due to a much better connection between the compute-chiplet(s) and the IO-chiplet. And each compute chiplet is rumored to go to 12 cores.

Just for curiosity sake in case this comes up for others, why did you have the "force_cross_eye_recovery_tool" entry in there in the first place? What does this do?

Hi i made new version with more options in case you are interested

У них сейчас работа по земле не совсем работает как надо, недолет. Если выставить QFE цели, то появляется индикация "ОТВ", при минимальных значениях дальности, причем нижняя риска зависит от QFE цели. Изменение QFE цели на QNE приводит более лучшей точности, но отключается "ОТВ" даже у самой земли. Если не выставил QFE как у цели и текущий QFE ниже высоты цели, у тебя постоянно "ОТВ" и применить оружие не можешь. В англицкой ветки это писали и горят, что исправят. Сейчас точно можно только НАРАми работать, с бомбами, если не делать пикирование под 70-80 градусов не попадешь. И в видео у Вакс - посмотрите, он сбрасывает не по метке, а по линии шпаги, сделайте расскрадровку видео. Вообще хз как у них работает, я потратил кучу времени в чем баг у них, приблизительно понял, но уже там ребята запостили этот баг. Если не исправят, запощу багрепорт заново, жду патч.

Even more - it stopped working for me completely. Now I need to set Game Options - measurement units to METRIC + Avionics to NATIVE + MiG special option Cockpit to Default to get full aircraft in its original form. Any other combination and I get either altimeter in Feet (in Metric setting), speed in Knots and some unrealistic English letters in HUD. Either Full RUS or Full ENG, not ideal that I need to change units of measurement between Hornet and MiG but other than that I will learn this limited Russian

The clearance for your landing is Runway 08. That doesn't exist, it's 07 but in either case, it's the opposite direction to where the C130 lands. So if you land on 07, then turn left at the end, it triggers the end of the mission.

definately supply the logs that BN has asked for; but also check out

I know I'm late to the party, but... DCS works well enough with a good bit of tinkering; be advised of Linux's 80-button input limit as per the kernel - I'm not sure if Lutris (the recommended method for installing) fixes that. Otherwise, suggest following guides like https://github.com/budderpard/DCS_Standalone_on_linux/blob/master/README.md

У их, у вирпиловского Прайма частично сделано, как надо, у них курок откидной двух позиционный, который если дальше нажимать уже нажимает гашетку, отжатие гашетки не возвращает, нужно пальцем возвращать. Функционально похож, но внешне нет, почему сделали для Прайма, а не для реплики ручек Су/Миг - хз.

You also need basic NS 430 module.

I think there is a version of OXR toolkit that does this?

It's over 74m for Nimitz class.

I have the NS 430 for MiG29 installed and have it googled on in the mission editor, still isn't in the cockpit, I've even changed the date to 2023 in case that was a problem, but nope, still no NS 430

Hi, can you attach your dcs log and dxdiag we can have a look for clues. thanks

A man can dream....but after all this time, and considering the rate of development of third party software in DCS, this is very likely a pipe-dream at this point.

I have done it on the Germany map as well. Its weird as there is nothing definite as far as I can make out that causes or stops it happening.

Hello pilots, I am starting this topic because i recently changed my vr headset to psvr2, and now having performance issues. Before i was using quest2 on link cable but with magicall tool called OTT(Oculus Tray Tool). In OTT i was using option called fov reduction, set to 0.8. It actually crop the image so performance gain is huge. Our eyes anyway don't see that outside region of 20% (differ from person to person 10-20%, someone is ok with 0.9, someone with 0.78...,ipd and head shape are reason). Question no 1: Is there a way to make and implement such tool for psvr2 and other steam displayport headsets? Question no 2: Am i wrong or ott was directly forcing dcs world to crop image before rendering? If yes than it means that ED left opened that option so it is easy for developers to help us here

We have already the option of choosing a fully realistic INS or a non realistic one that requires no fix taking. No fix taking being the non realistic option and brings the INS in line with how it worked in the FC MiG-29A. Could ED consider something similar the SPO-15LM? Example: Default - [Fully realistic] [User option] - Legacy FC3] As with the INS option, this would be naturally be enforced by the mission creator.