All Activity

Yes that's fine for Flaming Cliffs, but many people expect more from a full-fidelity module. If Heatblur can call their modules "F-14A-135-GR" and "F-4E-45-MC", then ED can call it "MiG-29 9.12A". It will also make the distinction between FC3 and FF easier for the more casual people

Remember: First: DCS World has no "Balance". Many of that projects has 3rd Party projects, no ED. 3rd party select projects by your criteria (normaly by countries). The Mig-29A by ED, has build with info the a old Warsac Pact country, no Russia. As Wags claim on previous Q&A, the problem has the available info, SME, resources, time and licenses to make a FF Redforce aircraft, remember the problems by Deka to make a chinesse FF aircrafts. About ED projects: Su-25A FF has no claimed by ED yet, as a Su-27 FF, A-10A FF and other Mig-29 FC versions. Await ED share news about them. Actual future ED projects F-15C (Blue) F-35A (Blue) Future Helo (Blue and/or Red) A6M5 Zero (Red) About 3rd Party projects: Aerges Mirage F-1M (Blue) F-104G/TF-104G (Blue) Airplane Simulation Company C-130J (Blue) Aviron KFIR (Blue/Red). Crosstail Studios A-1H (Blue) Deka Ironwork J-8B PP (Red) FlyingIrons Simulations: A-7E (Blue) HeatBlur Simulations: Eurofighter Trench 1 (Blue) A-6E (Blue) F-14A (Early) (Blue/Red) F-14B(U) (Blue) IndiaFoxtEcho: G.91R Gina (Blue) Magnitude 3 LLC: F-8J (Blue) MilTech 5 / PD: Bo-105 (Blue) Octopus-G La-7 (Red) Po-2 (Red) Su-17 (Red) Polychop Future Helo (Blue) Red Star Studios: Mig-17F (Red) The Rafale has only a rumor, none 3rd party has claimed them yet.

Works for me. From 0-30 degrees off nose IRST locks. From 31-45 only R-27. You can tell because you get no dashed circle only dashed crosshair. But 46-60 degrees nothing will work on HMS unless ( right now), R-73 only works 45 degrees off boresight but helmet can do up to 60

I support the rename. I wish ED was a bit more careful with internal naming scheme. For some aircrafts they use official designation but for some inofficial. And in some cases they actually duplicate designation for 2 variants (example Ka-50). BTW it is interesting to note that X-25, X-29 was envisioned in this version already. I wonder why they dropped that. Off course X-29 came to 29 later, but it is worth noting that it was part of upgrade options for 9.12 operators.

thanks you, we have asked the team to check this and have made a rpeort.

Not at all, but what is likely to get more attention: 5 threads with 5 posts each, or 1 thread with 25 posts? Granted, this quote is about wishlists, but still.

I always took MiG-29A as a colloquial form of NATO lingo Fulcrum-A following how NATO pilots talk about it and would have absolutely no sleepless nights if it stayed that way, but that is just me.

You don't have to like Apple to use an iPhone. You don't have to like ED to enjoy DCS the way you want to, be it as a digital museum or something else.

null

Красота, этого не хватает в официальном DCS

For testing purposes. so needs to be technical flawless. Can have some usemarks. Scammers dont even try please. I dont pay without protection. Getting scammed once is enough:)

Just added my details on the post on FB...hope it helps them..added screenshot of enviroinment details

Этот режим, по-моему, вообще не работает. null

When ED decides to make a full-fidelity Su-27, let's hope they actually call it "Su-27" and not T-10-1"

Hey, Just got AH-64 for a trial and I liked it very much so far. Now there is that issue where first of all it takes ages to load the mission and then the stutter and spiking while running as low 30fps doesn't get rid of it. Only thing I noticed was that when I plugged the wireless controller on the usb it disappear and everything started to run smooth as any other module on any map so far.

oh yeah you got me on this one... ^^ but not even the other bug-thread is flagged as reported or similar... so its probably not harmful to bring some attention to it...

I've shared my avionics language and I keep it constant to reproduce that. The only thing I change is Special -> mig-29a -> Customized cockpit. When 'Customized cockpit' value is 'default(medium)' or 'default(low)' - I get this language discrepancy highlighted above. When 'Customized cockpit' value is 'default' - I don't get this language discrepancy. It is a minor issue - and I think it only affect those who need to play with native plane language and lower cockpit resolutions, like me - with pretty outdated PC. Thank you!

HeHo ... jetzt muss ich doch mal fragen, weil ich mir keinen Reim drauf machen kann und ich hoffe, das die Schwarmintelligenz hier ne Antwort findet. Ich war seit einigen Wochen nicht mehr an DCS dran und wollte Heute mal die Mig29 etwas testen. Dabei musste ich feststellen, das wenn ich die Maus bewege, um Schalter zu drücken oder mich außen umzusehen, das Bild kurz stockt. Also bei jeder neuen Bewegung in alle Richtungen und bei beginn der Bewegung. Sonnst läuft alles 1A. Habe es bei allen Modulen und auf allen karten. Tastenbelegung ist noch nicht weiter angepasst - Nur das nötigste zum Fliegen. Mir ist das noch nie aufgefallen und in anderen Sims (MSFS) ist auch nicht davon zu spüren. Nur DCS.... Habt Ihr ne Idee?

I was just thinking this today. I'd definitely love some mod patches and other DCS merch.

Yes this would be a good fix.

null

134, HAD Threat table 1

The work we have already done for the weather has laid the foundation, and sensor blocking is still planned, but may require some extra work. I don't have any timeline to share currently. thank you

That's what I wrote in the 1st post but it's not what I'm looking for. The spinning should stop by default (see above).

Hey mate, I found that if you left-click your mouse on the picture and drag it around to the view you want, it will stay in that attitude. Cheers! Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk