All Activity

Its the reason I dont fly Iraq, even with the latest update the textures are messy and the terrain boring when low, Urgia Medi proved with CW Germany that really they should be the only ones allowed to do maps for DCS as it was was released in a much nicer state than both ED latest maps, also the update for Normandy 2 is looking fantasic

How many of them have documented in-combat cases? So, as for now in DCS we have failure-proof weapons. Same for most of RWR. But not for one specific version.

You missed the point. I never said he works/speak for ED, so don't look for it. I said he doesn't. I don't work or speak for ED either so I refrain from spreading misinformation that ED would have to clarify later.

I mainly fly the A-10 and the Hornet and sometimes the Mudhen. Happens with all. Mostly I experience that at NTTR. I get clearance, taxi to the numbers and then I get an 'Unable'. As I proceed with the TO run I'm again getting clearance.

You said you bound Jester Context Action to A? That wouldn't be the right bind for bringing up the menu. The menu one is called, I believe, Jester Ui Action, not Context Action. It would also be interesting to know if other HB UIs work. Press M to bring up the ingame Manual. Or click on the right canopy spot to bring up the Grease Pencil menu. Or RCTRL+V for the virtual browser or RCTRL+L for Jester Console. Do these work? If those work then it must likely be an issue with your Jester binds. If they do not work, its likely an issue with your graphics settings. Either case, share some screenshots of the corresponding stuff and we can probably get you back on track within a few minutes :)

Hey there, this is an already reported issue, cheers. It was done on purpose to prevent silly looking abrupt and jumping animations as can be seen in those other modules you referenced. It will be revisited and improved eventually. You mentioned that you are aware of the previous posts on this topic, so I am not sure why you are creating a new one. FYI that wont speed up things, cheers.

With which plane? With MiG-29A is ok now.

Thank you all for the support! For weeks thought that I'm the only one noticed the missing points. If I could choose I would give my full support for Zahedan airport. My reason is because ED actually placed their beacon in Afghanistan map and it is on the border between two maps, i.e. H3 for Syria and Iraq and they actually populated Iraq map on request recently. And then is a military installation and who knows what asked ED so they must obey by law. In matter of fact I'll make a request on Zahedan latter! I would imagine that having a AB in the middle of the dunes is an epic experience no doubt

https://www.dualshockers.com/tokyo-game-show-flight-simulator-razbam-eagle-dynamics-dcs/ Bye Phant

I do have this all over the place. NTTR, Caucasus, etc. But it doesn't bother me too much while patiently waiting for the new ATC. Thougg, can't say that anything changed with the last patch for me

Можно ссылку на тот инструмент,который поддерживает моды?Я правильно понял что его нужно установить отдельно в уже имеющиюся версию программы.В моем случаи ето стабильная версия.

Noticed it, too.

Доброго времени всём. Планируется, обновление с поддержкой нового МиГ-29?

Likely the first two would be closest… however, the reality is i have a life and a family, even though I’m retired and I play most days, turning up at a regular time just doesn’t work for me… which it does for most other people… I have little or no interest in PvP never have in any game. I’m introverted by nature and whilst I have friends and enjoy their company, but, I grew up gaming solo, and honestly have very little interest in gaming with others.

Hello, Compared to the MiG 29 FC3, the R73 missile of the FF version has issues in the frontal aspect. It's difficult, if not impossible, to obtain launch authorization. Is this a bug or my fault? MiG29 FC3 R73.trk MiG29 FF R73.trk

As ED has said, it is not up to the same standard as their newest R-27R/ER release in tens of seeker. But I don’t think it should be that hard since it already has all the advanced FM stuff done

I for one am simply not interested in MP. Speaking PvE: I want to fly, when I have time, not when a server happens to be full. I want to fly what (plane and mission) I want, not what is on the menu for some virtual squadron. Speaking PvP: I am in no mood to spawn, do a time consuming cold start only to be blown to pieces on the taxiway, by friend or foe. And yes, my aged brain is simply too slow to compete with teens who spend all their time in front of screen. In short, I simply don't miss anything in my SP world.

No pressure - I mistakenly thought this was the much hyped dynamic campaign offering (hence the FOMO as you can imagine).

I've been keeping my eye on this thread, and was suprised there was no discussion about it. I am a novice at the CH-47, but I've noticed this as well. And I'm thinking, "wait, the Chinook shoud be much faster than this!" The LCT becomes saturated at around 140 Knots. Now, it's not like I'm Mr. Helicopter here or anything, but my guess is that once the fuselage starts to pitch down, it becomes a bit unstable. 140 knots is like 260 kph. The Hind, the Hip and the Hokum are also considered fast helicopters, and they are rattling your teeth out at that speed. It would be interesting to hear what somebody that actually knows what they're talking about weigh in on this.

I've read that most DCS players prefer Single Player. I've also seen many posts from people who tried Multiplayer but, for various reasons, decided it wasn't for them and stuck with Single Player. If that describes you, I’d like your input: What would make you consider joining a DCS multiplayer server? Or, what would a multiplayer server need (or avoid) for you to try it? For example: A PvE campaign where you only play with friends you choose. A community that carefully selects members to ensure maturity, or one that offers real human ATC 24/7. Servers that automatically match you with players of similar skill for fair PvP. Or do you simply prefer flying alone, with no interest in playing with others? I’m curious whether players avoid Multiplayer just because they prefer flying solo, or because a suitable Multiplayer environment doesn’t exist for them.

Yes that is a great idea! I am thinking sneaking low under him, to avoid his radar, then as I pass under him, I go full afterburner straight up to high altitude and attack from his 6. Many pilots BVR from high altitude, a serious drawback is that you are clearly painted against a big blue sky.

The APG-63 radar was more advanced than the N001 in every respect. It had a more advanced antenna with lower sidelobes, a better signal-to-noise ratio, and better digital processing. The Soviet Tikhomirov Research Institute used the APG-63 data as a specification for the development of the "Mech" radar. However, they failed to fully complete the task, and as a result, they had to create a radar based on the N019 from the MiG-29, scaling it up. You're mistaken. Interception control involved displaying control markers on the aircraft's instruments. In other words, the pilot was shown where to fly and when to turn on the radar using an indication. Exactly the same as was later done in the USSR, including on the MiG-29. All missiles in the world have a certain percentage of launch failures.

It has significant launch failure rate in 1991, when some F-15C in combat with MiG-29 wasn't able to properly apply 1/2 or even 3/4 of its missiles.

You continue to perpetuate myths. The birthplace of the GCI and AWACS is the USA. They were the first to implement the F-102/106 semiautomatic intercept system back in the 1950s. This system was in use at NORAD even before the Soviets copied it. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-Automatic_Ground_Environment