All Activity

Hi, wing flex will be added after the damage model is completed. thank you

Yes, thats what would be very appreceated. As I said, its a communication thing. Lot´s of claims out there, lot´s of noise around the Razbam Situation, DC and the general course of DCS. Some clarification whats your longterm strategie is, and what we could expect from a DC would at least help me to adjust my expectations and get a much better feeling about purchases in the future, I hope. For example the C130. Basically, I want to own and learn this module. But that primarily depends on its possible use. If I just want to fly it, there’s a better simulator where I can fly large transport aircraft all over the world. However, if I have the prospect of being able to meaningfully use the included gameplay mechanics in a dynamic campaign, then the situation looks quite different. But therefore I want to roughly know, what this DC will look like, and if it will suite my wishes of a dynamic campaign. Thanks @NineLine for clarifying, that SP, Caucasus and modern era are just development steps. I can live with that. A little deeper insights in what we will be able to do in a DC will help me to anticipate if I will like it or not.

First, nobody here is interested who thinks what. Only facts are appreciated. Second, you didn't read my original post about balance. I wrote not about gameplay balance but simulation consistency putting all units in same level of application of physical laws. Third. I never saw any real technical input from you regarding SPO. I posted an excerpt from one Soviet document citing that it works, you posted an excerpt from other Soviet document citing that it doesn't. Both claims are in words not in math and so don't matter. If you have information proving HOW it doesn't work as intended - please go ahead. Fourth. Intercept system for F-102 F-106 is very different from what Soviets ever did, it just has different task and function and overall phylosophy. As for GCI overall, its origin lies in Battle of Britain and it was never a secret for any state. Everybody knew it's needed, everybody developed it, it's not a big deal at all. It was 2 vs 2 and 1 vs 1 encounters of F-15C and MiG-25PD. In 1 vs 1 both F-15C and MiG each launched all 4 medium ranged missiles at each other with no result. All AIM-7 malfunctioned or missed and all R-40 missed or MiG had to break lock to evade.

Hello, From what I understood this is not implemented yet. But there was some talk here that there are some functions. So my question is: Are there any functions and benefits from this switch, currently?

this has been reported thank you

It wasn't. 2.9.0 beta added it in October 2023.

Not implemented. It will come soon.

It's a new 3D model. The wing flex is planned to come later in the development [from Wags comment].

Hi white dwarf, the team will investigate but if you have a short track replay example please attach it. thank you

Has anyone actually finished the included campaign? I love the module, but the campaign must the the worst one I've ever played, including free community ones! It's arcadish, irrealistic (not the story but the tasks) and unnecessarily impossible... english translation is terrible, most times the tasks are not clear, and I had to replay the mission several times just to understand what to do... is there something I'm not getting? I suffered until mission 10 but honestly I'm going to abandon it here. Please see to fix it somehow.

?

Hi Wing, Its low priority but it is reported. thank you

Thankyou!! just about to try. Which version Pimax play please and which Nvidia driver. Regards

Totally immune to MP. I have no friends, none of them plays flight sim, I play the game the way I want, at my own pace, enjoy my own win and failures. I have games which have great AI, and play those when I wish to be on my own. I don't want friendly fire on myself and on others It was called Warbirds, irrc. Because I was there with a friend, and constantly get slaughtered. Then we moved on the Flanker 1.0 (Yes, I am this old) http://www.totalsims.com/info_warbirds.php

What good is air traffic without even 737 or A320 models?

No, virtual gloves show only in VR. A few days ago, I was doing CPG in multiplayer and my pilot asked me how many targets I could see. I had my joypad in my hand and had to take my hand off it and look for the cyclic to press the PTT-ICS, but I spontaneously raised my arm and showed with my hand that I could see two. That gave me this idea. If I may, I would like to show a video from CAP2 to demonstrate what I mean by hooking your arms onto your hands (if I am not allowed to post this video, please let me know and I will remove it). Here is a video of hands in DCS using Leap or, more generally, the tracking of DCS hands

Hello fellas! I dont know if this has been asked before. I noticed the new Full Fidelity MIG-29 does not have the visual wingflex. The FC3 variant did have a realistic looking wingflex. What happened here? Is the flexing also coming to the new Fulcrum?

With FF MiG-29, by default, IRST search/bvr, IRST vertical scan, helmet modes, only use IRST. You cannot fire R-27R/ER by default and radar will be off The only way to use radar with IRST, switch sensors on locked target, fire fox 1 from helmet/irst vert scan/irst bvr scan , is to use coop mode. Coop mode will allow if one sensor loses lock to have the other sensor pick up the lost lock if it can. However, if you set radar mode to dummy you get additional functionality in coop mode using the IRST modes. For IRST vertical scan/opt/helmet, radar will lock STT as soon as IRST lock, allowing you to fire fox 1. For helmet both sensors will try to lock and first to lock becomes primary. Since IRST only looks 30 degrees to the side, that means you only have radar for helmet locking (other then R-73) from 30-60 degrees off the nose. Where it’s different with extra functionality is IRST BVR/scan mode. If there is no laser range the radar will provide ranging in scan mode. If you press lock a second time it will STT allowing you to fire fox 1. If laser range appears (3-6.5 km), the radar will also STT. So if trying to be stealthy, it is a big tool to use IRST scan (remember to turn down gain) and range with radar scan. If you have radar leading/primary mode for any reason, switching to an IRST mode will change to IRST leading if IRST can lock.

Does not matter if it's baked texture or dynamic light. Both look different for night and day so it is possible to toggle it. Currently it's only based on night/day hours - it could also be based on new wished-for triggers.

Niceeeeee!

You Sir @Gremlin77, saved my day! I was struggeling alot with this, thanks for sharing. Really appreciate it.

I just checked and I have to apologize! My last sortie was the day before the patch. Seems to work now! I only checked at NTTR but I consider the bug as squashed as you also confirmed. Sorry for falsification, I should 've checked the patch notes more carefully!

Yeah I hope that when ED some day gets their dynamic campaign out there will be all modules playable. At the moment this dynamic campaign is only for two modules. But if everything goes well there might be a possibility to add some modules later.

Да. Конечно. Естественно. Но зачем тогда городили огород с бланкированием и со стороны СПО и со стороны РЛС? Так считает и блок-схема Н019АЭ из польской библиотеки, гриф снят. Там какая-то логика его получения, перед выдачей есть кеширование сигнала в 1 бит. Выдача по аналоговой ВЧ линии. За встречу и обработку в СПО отвечает целая одна из кассет. Нужно выяснить кто совершил цепь должностных преступлений. КБ под прикрытием заказчика сделав лампочки для красоты, или заказчик не научившись его обслуживать и забив.