All Activity
- Past hour
-
Misleading product description [NS430 & NS430 for Mig 29]
Ornithopter replied to Pougatchev's topic in DCS: NS 430
They should make the description a bit more accurate about what it does and doesn't do. Other than that, how was the rest of the play, Mrs. Lincoln? -
RyanR started following Sniperpod Crosshairs Disappearing in XR
-
It's a shame about this whole situation. Honestly, the only way this unfortunate misunderstanding could be cleared up is if Aerges shared some pics of the Mirage F1M.
-
correct as is Sniperpod Crosshairs Disappearing in XR
RyanR replied to MeanJim's topic in Bugs and Problems
OK. So it is supposed to be hidden? No way to unhide it other than to lase? -Ryan -
Radar could be interesting the F3R version of the AESA doesn’t add any additional modes from the F3, those are added in F4. So if you can do an F3 you could do a F3R https://www.key.aero/forum/modern-military-aviation/129695-f-35-news-multimedia-discussion-thread-2?p=3021418&page=137
-
How 'good' is this mod with respect to the VSN F-4? Haven't really heard too much about what it's like but I'd love to give it a try at some point, just wanted to know what everyone else's experience is?
-
Zuyev's account seems to indicate they did like the name Fulcrum and used it sometimes. Same as with Su-27, that one also got a cool name. "Bear" for the Tu-95 also quickly got traction once the crews found out about it.
- 18 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- name
- mission editor
- (and 4 more)
-
MAXsenna started following No Drop tank multiplayer
-
Why are you posting this here? Shouldn't you post it under the relevant module? Cheers!
-
They did is because westerns would get confused by 9.12A
- 18 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- name
- mission editor
- (and 4 more)
-
к чему привыкать? Ты про доп.линзы эти на магнитиках?Очень комфортные,не нужно привыкать и так всё нормально,просто чёткость добавляется
-
Cyclic trimmer not working correctly in instant mode (FFB)
tekwoj replied to tekwoj's topic in Bugs and Problems
I'll check the sliders tomorrow, it's getting too late to launch dcs. -
Misleading product description [NS430 & NS430 for Mig 29]
Ornithopter replied to Pougatchev's topic in DCS: NS 430
Well, you might be right. It would be pretty cool though if there is a MiG-29 that could do one of those L/VNAV approaches coupled to the autopilot, with just a 430W, wouldn't it? -
Misleading product description [NS430 & NS430 for Mig 29]
twistking replied to Pougatchev's topic in DCS: NS 430
I was under the impressions that the 430 comes with its own radio(s). So it allows to monitor more frequencies, which would be a neat feature even if it's not encrypted. -
Cyclic trimmer not working correctly in instant mode (FFB)
MAXsenna replied to tekwoj's topic in Bugs and Problems
Right, that's the one! [emoji1303] Have you toyed with the sliders? I don't remember what I sat them at, but they do make a difference. Gonna read your OP one more time. [emoji6] EDIT: Right, I remember now, but I don't remember how I fixed it. And it doesn't go the wrong way, right? That's why I asked about swapping the channels. I have to do that for every module. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk -
Misleading product description [NS430 & NS430 for Mig 29]
Ornithopter replied to Pougatchev's topic in DCS: NS 430
I don't happen to be in DCS buying mode, despite the current sales. I have enough aircraft for now on backlog. I've been flying the Chinook and the Aviojet lately. I'm flying the Aviojet because I'm keeping myself current without killing too many braincells. I haven't bought the Mig-29, and maybe someday, but not today. But, I have to ask, is a single sentence in a product description really that big a deal? A lot of people are loving this aircraft clearly, and they couldn't care less about a minor mistake in a one page description for a new airplane. Most likely the new college grad they hired to write the description just made a simple mistake after looking at the website of the real-world analog. - Yesterday
-
Cyclic trimmer not working correctly in instant mode (FFB)
tekwoj replied to tekwoj's topic in Bugs and Problems
If you're talking about Module Individual Force Feedback toggle option in the gazelle's special options then I have it checked, without it the trim is VERY broken, having double input (1 from trim, second from stick position offset forced by trim) -
Civilian air traffic auto-generation feature
MAXsenna replied to twistking's topic in DCS Core Wish List
Yup! All the weapons in ARMA look identical, while called something else. And like I said, I don't understand why they don't see it as free advertising. If I made something cool, it would be dope to see it in a computer game. -
Civilian air traffic auto-generation feature
twistking replied to twistking's topic in DCS Core Wish List
That's all true, but for a civilian airliner module ED could skirt around licensing issues by not using the brand and product names. The visual external appearance of a 737 is not something you will get dragged to court about. Maybe change a few details visually to be extra safe. I mean have a look at DCS: NS 430. Looks suspiciously similar to a GNS 430. I think this is a case in trademark law where courts have decided more clearheaded than people suspect... -
We might get lucky with a MKK/MK2 because it’s an export product. i would love both flankers though SM for radar and thrust vectoring. the mod team has one of five manuals MK2 for missiles and air to ground. Better documented jet and much more similar to the base flanker (it comes across more as a modernization then a different jet. —- we also have the pocket guide for the Yemeni SMT manual
-
So, "F-35 Fat Amy" then? No, not really. Su-27 is called flanker sometimes though
- 18 replies
-
- name
- mission editor
- (and 4 more)
-
Cyclic trimmer not working correctly in instant mode (FFB)
MAXsenna replied to tekwoj's topic in Bugs and Problems
@tekwoj Not what I wrote. I'm not talking about what trim setting you are using. (Instant is of course the correct one for FFB). There should be a some special settings for FFB under the Special Settings IIRC. Can't remember what it's called and my computer is dead, so I can't check for you. Sorry! Cheers! EDIT: Have you remembered to swap the axis under the FFB tune? -
v3MAW- Recruiting experienced F-18 drivers
MPalmer replied to Reezo_200's topic in General DCS Squadrons
I'll let the group know you are unable to join the discord server. -
WOLF_PACK_US_WWII_DYNAMIC_BASE_CAPTURE_v6.5.1U (1)-20250930-183236.trk
-
Hi all, How do you find the height perception in DCS? I have a Facebook Q3 headset, and I really feel I don’t get enough sense of the altitude. It’s decades since I was last in the cockpit of something decent, and my eyes aren’t what they used to be, but I’ve always thought that you don’t get sufficient impression of altitude and the enormity of one’s surroundings in DCS. But, as said, I’m old so I figured it just could be that. However, just a few days ago I was passenger on a civilian flight in a place covered by DCS. It was scattered clouds as well and I knew that altitude. So, I thought id recreate what I saw out of the window in dcs. And now I’m certain that there’s something off in altitude perception or perspective in DCs. anyone else noticed this? And is there settings I can change to rectify this? (It would not ve surprising if I’m to blame…)