Leaderboard

...\Eagle Dynamics\Ka-50\Config\View\ view.lua -- Camera view angle limits {view angle min, view angle max}. CameraViewAngleLimits = {} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iSu_27] = {20.0, 140.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iSu_33] = {20.0, 120.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iSu_25] = {20.0, 120.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iSu_39] = {20.0, 120.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iMiG_29] = {20.0, 120.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iMiG_29K] = {20.0, 120.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iA_10] = {5.0, 120.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iF_15] = {20.0, 140.0} CameraViewAngleLimits[PlaneIndex.iKA_50] = {20.0, [b]120[/b].0} There is a view.lua in BS - change the highlighted in the KA-50 line to 200. And you should be fine.

Ну вот пожалуй пора и мне выложить свою миссию. Прошу ногами не пинать: это моя первая миссия. Дельные советы приму к сведению. Немного о самой миссии. Миссия расчитана на игроков которые уже прошли кампанию но не хардкорщиков. Я не стремился напичкать сектор ПВО-шками а потом запустить туда несчастный вертолет,-в стиле попробуй выживи. Упор сделан на оживление среды обитания, правда озвучки пока нет но скоро появитса. Да и еще я не обращал внимания какие страны с кем враждуют,а ставил первые попавшиеся.Ну...удачного полета:pilotfly: Описание: ...одним прекрасным летним днем Вы ,по приказу командира, отправляетесь на борт американского авианосца, свято веря что летите туда с целью обмена опытом с иностранными коллегами.Но на борту выясняетса что Вас выбрали для проведения секретной операции по уничтожению главарей терористической организации, которые собрались на сходку на яхте неподалеку от берегов Грузии.Ваша задача скрытно добратса до сектора цели и уничтожить ее.От Вас потребуетса умение пользоватса Абрисом( хотябы по минимуму) assassin.miz

Вы еще не видели летающей полатки:megalol:

You're welcome. Always a pleasure to help someone like yourself.

I have the same problem, i get the error code 13 and it is strange that this files are corupted and no one is doing something about it. I just spend 50 dollars and 4 hours of my day trying to figure out what is going on. If the dam file is corrupted why they don't fix it, if i buy something i want what i pay for if you can't deliver it i will call my credit card and tell them to deny the payment. Also i will be telling all my friends not to even bother with a product that can't even provide a good download link for there costumers.

No Becks..... read the thread. You of course can change the affinity of a process in XP, but it just provides no benefit with regards to DCS-BS. It has already been explained that it has something to do with how Vista handles DX or some such thing. Becks, there is no real reason for them to fix it soon. Wombat has provided an excellent solution. But then again, there are lots of people who dont come to the forums to find these fixs.... I wonder if they would find the patch then? And like I said in my first post, I understand why ED decided to use single core considering the problems there was at first when dual cores were coming out. But that was fixed with a Windows patch as it was just a load balancing problem. So hopefully in the first patch it gets changed back.

Do you have the Russian or English version? I'm not terribly familiar with input bugs, but perhaps there is someone else who can help you with this. Also search this forum - there have been some issues with the X-52 PRO.

ОСА может работать и без привязки к месности..но в реальной жизни никто на свободную охоту на ОСЕ не ездиет...а выполняет приказы отданные начальниками..и уж поверь Батарея ОСЫ не будет работать в жиме поиска целей как в составе батареи так и в одиночном режиме..это просто сметрельно опасно для нее самой..что к стате реализовано в ЛО..такого в жизни нет , а если и есть то это уже явно какието крайние меры.. По сути работа строится следующим образом..к примеру..в поселке "А" размещена 1 батая ОСА не подалеку в деревне "Б" на растоянии к примеру 10км. рамещениа 2 батарея и в лесополосе "В" на растоянии от пос "А" 30км. 3 батарея все три батареи в целом должны обеспечить защиту на данном направлении. в поселке "Ц" который нахдится на удалении 100км.(да,да именно 100 может быть и больше..главное только чтоб техника работала..) расположен командный центр который имеет в своем рапяжении данные получаемые с РЛС (по телекоду, спомощью Р-111 или Р-123) далее если цель появляется в зоне пажения Любой батаи ОСА комбату на КШМку передаются по томуже телекоду на ИКО целеуказания и тот уже приняв цели и их движение..по внутреней р\сети дает батареии азимут цели и дальность до нее ..после чего Боевые машины врубают "высокое" и ищат цель..после доклада комбату об захвате и сопровпждении цели комбат дает команду какой именно машине(м) произвести пуск по цели. после пажения цели.."высокое" выкл-ся и снова "курим"... вот для этого и нужна привязка к месности. А если ОСА будет тупо крутить башкой и ждать пока цель войдет в зону поражения (как в ЛО) такая батарея долго не просуществует..

This is not a final decision. But I think a demo will probably not now be developed. We have released much earlier than planned the English version. Creating a demo would freeze up resources for another month. Much better we spend time on developing the A-10. and get it completed for 2009. Jim Business Development

Here you are buddy i hope this helps.

A large focus of the team right now is completing the French, German and Spanish versions with localization. We hope to release them early next year. The boxed version includes the DVD and hard copy quick start guides. All other manuals are in PDF format.

На РППУ Освещение КМА1-IV (с фиксацией) Целеуказание КМ1-1 Радио и триммер возможно ПКн2-1 В реале возможно для триммера используется внешне такая же как ПКн2-1 - ПКн4-1 только она двухполосная. На РОШ кнопки скорее всего те же. Кнюппель МЕТКА на РППУ и управления фарой РОШ не имеет смысла искать - они будут очень дорогие, и все равно не запользуешь для компьютера наверное. Там сама резиновая хатка не шевелится вообще. Она тензометрическая - снимает давление под пальцем. Кнюппель управления подвесками это вероятно 4КНР (не могу нигде найти такие) - используется для триммирования во многих боевых самолетах. Тумблеры двухпозиционные ВГ-15К 2С или ППГ15К 2С Тумблер снижение\маршрут - не могу назвать, не помню. Он вниз нажимной, без фиксации. Точно такие используются например на Ту-154 для включения и контролья обогрева ППД. Чуть позже выясню его маркировку.

I found'em: ...\Eagle Dynamics\Ka-50\Temp\ Thanks for the hint!

I thought the flare colour looked too pink so I changed it.

RShift + P жми и будет тебе пилот, даже с руками на РППУ и РОШ :)

IHMO - the Saitek Aviator has all what it needs to 'start' with: Rapid fire trigger 4 buttons 8-way ‘point-of-view’ hat switch 4 two-way toggle switches 3D Twist Rudder control Dual throttles Single spring gimbal mechanism And he is also not so expensive. And when you 'upgrade' you can use him as some kind of "centre console" - and most imported: he is precise !

:thumbup: Thanks Frazer! I tried my best. Virtual Festival of Aerobatic Teams (VFAT) is indeed top of the cream when it comes to entertainment combat flight simulators. I was really proud to participate. I thank you and everybody else who made VFAT possible. :thumbup:

Maybe to few stick time for the real Russian drivers? Maybe also that it´s required to steady your vodka-shaky hands from last night at the o-club... ;)

Great pics! Thanks!

If you have not done so, please take a read through this: http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=569223&postcount=27

Mister BoneDust, I'm a huge fan of your Blue-light cockpit (assuming you're the same person). Looks like ya can't keep a good man down! A rep to show my gratitude. Cheers m8!

The planes new so its natural it has gripes. So does the F-15 if I recall... to be worse! (broken longerons huh) the press is interpreting the interviewed brass about these issues on their own way. F-35 will fare no better. Its already expensive even if its total price tag is as stealthy as the plane itself. As for EF2K, thats a myth that needs to be debunked. Europe has always lacked an F-15 class fighter. On top of that one that also is multirole. Its no more useless than all the others. It is unmatched in europe and many Airforces had to resort to stopgap old airframes while waiting for it. Im my view they are urgently needed for a credible defense. I am a bit tired to explain while comparing price tags that Euro nowadays is worth a big deal more than US dollars too :D

We are interested in *.crash files from \Temp\ folder of BS and in steps to reproduce this.

Я могу дать IP машинки и завести учетку. Это засетапленная windows XP в XEN'е под Linux Debian Lenny. Работает на сервере HP DL380. Сейчас под windows выделено: 1 CPU Intel® Xeon® X5450@3.00GHz 2048 Mb RAM 10 Gb HDD Сервер работает 24/7, расположен в дата-центре Corbina Telecom (Beeline), так что проблем с доступностью и каналом нет. При необходимости количество процов, объем памяти и размер винта могут быть увеличены. Сейчас у меня просто нет времени этим заниматься, поэтому "отдам в хорошие руки" под установку сервера ЧА. P.S. Если найдется энтузиаст, пишите в ПМ.

Если надо - можем выложить. Только кампания на английском.

You are just working against the autopilot. I will explain: You are zipping along at a nice stable airspeed and altitude, let's just say 200kph and 500 meters (no special meaning here, just some numbers). You have all autopilot channels on, including altitude. Suddenly, you decide that you are too hot, and your ventilator fan just isn't helping, so you think to yourself "Self, we must get up higher where it is nice and cool!" (I think your self has a great idea, by the way!). So you pull in some collective (let's say for argument's sake, you just pull in a teeny tiny bit of collective), and lo and behold, nothing happens! You VSI stays pegged at zero! So you pull in some more collective, still nothing...then a bit more...until FINALLY your VSI starts to move. "Great!" says self. So your climb is initiated and you have the rate of climb you want (never fast enough when you're sweating and you want some cool air, eh?). Eventually, you start feeling that nice cool air up at 2,000 meters flowing into the cockpit, and you decide that you're high enough, so you reduce the collective until your altitude stabilizes (VSI back at zero). (but it never "quite" stabilizes...oh it gets close, but something seems amiss...but along you go, oblivious, etc.) Hey! It's time to turn! (or slow down or speed up or whatever) So you start your bank (or whatever) and the aircraft starts to turn (or whatever)...but then starts to lose altitude (or even gain, depending on what the "whatever" is). "What?!?" says self, very upset that his altitude channel is not working. Well, your altitude channel IS working. It is trying to hold you at 500 meters. Well, you're way up at 2,000 meters! What is going on?! Remember back when you were at 500 meters, and you wanted to climb, so you pulled in some collective (a teeny tiny bit, if my memory is correct)? Well your collective input to the collective servo moved (oh yes indeed it did, since it is physically connected, it has no choice!) But your collective control rods are not the only thing that tell the collective servo what to do. The autopilot also has a say. And you autopilot says it wants to stay at 500 meters, so as you're adding collective, the autopilot is taking it right back out. Not out of your control input, but out of the servo. Eventually, your collective movement will exceed 20 percent of its travel. (Note: I have an X-52 throttle, it moved about 10-15%.) When your collective input exceeds 20% of its travel, the autopilot runs out of authority, and your input starts to work. So your started climbing...up and up...until you got to 2000 meters, then you lowered the collective to zero your VSI. The catch here is that your autopilot still wants to lower the collective, but it can't, as it's already "lowering" it by 20% (which you have happily overriden by moving the collective more and more). Now if you do any maneuver that would cause a change in altitude (just about anything in a helicopter will do that, they sure are touchy), then your altitude would start changing, because your autopilot has done all that it can do. About this time, you realize the error of your ways, and you hit your collective brake button (just a tap here will do). You have just told your autopilot that you want to hold THIS altitude (2,000 meters). Here it helps to know that your autopilot's input to the servo is not really a direct mechanical linkage like your collective is (it's all computery, using little things called feedback sensors that tell the autopilot exactly where your collective is set and how much pitch is in the blades, etc....very complicated and all that). So when you hit that button, not only does it tell your autopilot to hold this new altitude, it ALSO zeroes your autopilots collective input! Now your autopilot once again has the authority to make minor changes to the collective servo to hold your altitude, and you're back to making turns, etc, without losing or gaining any altitude! Yay! Everyone wins!

Yay, an update! Lots of changes here, and I'm sure more will be needed. My next project is to seperate out all of the "detailed" checks into their own seperate "mini" check lists...things such as the fire supression system test, EEG tests, EGT limiter test, etc. After that, it's a toss-up between emergency procedures and how to engage targets. Don't forget that I'm just making simple check lists, I'm not rewriting the manual here, this is no substitute for reading the manual! (Just felt like I needed to say that.) Also, after this, I'll probably just put the file (files?) up on my website instead of attaching them here. Ka-50 Checklist A5.pdf