Taz1004

I'm talking about use of acronyms. Not standardizing what features are called.

I wouldn't be able to search any on Russian jets then...

Can we make airfield ATC you take off from always #1 on comms ATC list? So we can program hotkeys?

May be off topic but these common features should have same name so they can be searched. Some plane says RDR, some say ANT, some say Radar... Heading, HDG... Guess it'd be a wish list item.

I didn't mean perfection literally and you're still missing the point. You were talking about trimming until it flies itself and now you're saing just assist. Which is actually what I and many others have said. Did anyone here say don't use trim? Which answer was painful to see?

I thought I answered that. Significant is relative term. What's significant to me may not be for you. The video shows you frames per second between two CPU's. And he clearly answers your question in Conclusion part. I don't think you need to be techy or able to translate metrics to understand FPS?

Thanks but I'm not sure how long ago that was but DCS 2.7 uses all cores now. Seems to use more of physical cores than logical cores but still is frametime difference between turning SMT on or off. I am aware of Ryzen Master but I prefer to do it in BIOS. Also, I'm guessing you haven't tried undervolting? There's no excuse for not doing it. Even with stock HSF. Mine benchmarks at 5080Mhz with same voltage and heat. Versus 4700Mhz in Auto. I used exact setting he used in the video below. With -30.

I'd say yes based on this comparison to 5600X. But only you can decide if the performance is worth your money. AMD Ryzen 5600x vs 3700x in Sim Racing & VR (Wow! What a difference!) - YouTube

I do try to trim to perfection in MSFS 2020. Question was trimming during "combat".

I think I figured out the issue. It was heat. All the reviews said stock HSF is fine for "normal usage" if you're not overclocking. They must be talking about browsing internet. Stock HSF is not fine for gaming. Not for CPU intensive game like DCS. I did have Corsair H60 AIO that I used for i7-4790K. I was saving it for when I build another server with that old chip. And most reviews said stock HSF is "fine" so that's what I used on the 5600X. But now, I put that AIO and the stutter is gone and temperature is 15' celcius cooler. And yes, the stock HSF was mounted properly. Thermal paste distribution was very even when I took it off and idle temp was around 40'. So when the cores boost and reach over 72', they started throttling back. And when they throttle back, there's no in-between. They throttle back to 3.6. Which I think is cause of stutter. Also consistent with my other results. That TPU1 was smoother because its temp was lower. And Undervolting was smoother because it lowered the temp. Unless only thing you're doing is browsing the internet or YouTube, get better HSF. Even if you're not overclocking.

My upgrade should've been bigger jump as I went from i7-4770K to 5600X. With GTX-1080. There was improvement like loading time and less stutter in mission with a lot of ground units. But I wouldn't say it was huge. Frametime for the most part remained same which is what I expected.

Opinion on AMD setting seems to be all over the place. I don't like these guys video because they never get to the point but the question this video is addressing is similar to my issue. I seem to be getting frame stutter with default when cores auto throttle. But again, benchmarks higher. AMD's Precision Boost Overdrive — Turn PBO OFF to Improve Performance? - YouTube All TPU1 does is fix core multiplier. And doesn't increase wattage. And it generates less heat because the CPU seems to generate most heat when they're running at 4.6Ghz. And with TPU1, it doesn't get that high. Another thing I don't get is with default 3.6-4.6, cores never run in between. It's either 3.6 or 4.6. Undervolting however decreases power and temp. And as a result cores run at higher speed. Seems odd that this board and CPU has been out for over 6 months and still can't find solid information.

Thanks, I love the layout. Is there way to stop default from repopulating with every update?

I don't have legacy A10C installed anymore. And then legacy version for 2.5 and 2.7... I'm having hard time keeping track of what was changed. You might try downloading the A10C-II version and copy the a10c_cpt_taz_glass_Diffuse.dds from that file to the Legacy version mod.

Even PBO is different from Asus to MSI to AsRock. PBO limit under advanced setting is used to undervolt in MSI but that's under CPU offset in Asus and PBO recommended to turn off along with CBS when undervolting. Which is another confusing part. Currently my PBO is set to Auto as I'm not looking to overclock.

Thanks, I did some testing on my own since I couldn't find any information on this. All just talking about RAM. I tried subscribing to AMD forum and their email verification crap doesn't work. I did undervolt the CPU in the BIOS by 0.1v and that seems to lower temp by 5' with no performance loss. As for clock speed, Default benchmarks higher in Cinebench but no difference in DCS frametime. I'm sure because my GPU is limiting. But TPU 1 fixed at 4.2Ghz seems to run at lower temp and it may be placebo but seem smoother in DCS. So TPU 1 with 0.1v undervolt is what I have it atm.

It's called DOCP instead of XMP and that's on. And that wasn't the question. 3.6 boosted to 4.6 or fixed 4.2. Which is faster in normal usage is the question. It's not really overclocking as temp is actually lower with TPU.

Haven't used AMD since Athlon so BIOS setting is very confusing to me and need some advice. I have Asus Strix B550-F as motherboard and 32GB DDR4 3600. I'm not trying to overclock too much at this point as I'm only using stock HSF and don't see much point since my graphic card is still GTX 1080. But just trying to find out which is better setting to use. If I leave BIOS at default, core speed fluctuates from 3.6Ghz to 4.6Ghz. I understand it's Base + Boost. If I set TPU1 in Bios which I think is Asus's auto overclock, then core is locked at 4.2Ghz. Even tho #1 benchmark higher, I seem to get some pauses while working with graphic apps like Maya when executing a task.

I'm only getting 0.2-0.3ms difference between Low and Ultra. I guess it depends on amount of clouds but that test was on Hornet Maverick-E quick mission at Cacasus. Which had decent amount of low level clouds. That difference is far less than performance hit from ReShade. 5600X, 32GB DDR4 3600, GTX 1080, Vive Pro @2800 vertical resolution.

Sorry, you didn't tag me so I didn't notice the question. It was the last bomb that missed. It was well within min range. I did test few more times after that and most of the time I get all 4 on target. And miss from time to time. I'd say accuracy is about 80-90%. Also similar result from Hornet.

I am talking about rippling 4. There already is a thread about this and as I posted here couple weeks ago, when rippling 4, I sometimes get one miss from time to time. But otherwise, they're spot on.

JDAM was really inaccurate and was fixed in recent patch. I'm getting about 80%-90% accuracy now whereas it was pretty much a dumb bomb before.

The new patch, VR cloud is much better. Cloud doesn't shift around. But anything less than Ultra shimmers and is unacceptable. Still much better and great job.

That's what autopilot is for. I use trim to get it to ball park. After dropping ordinance from one side, it will pull and find myself having to put a lot of stick input to keep it straight. That's when I use trim. I think the answer you're looking for is if it's necessary to have it accessible. And my opinion is yes.

Are you using area or point track in TGP? I find point track to be more reliable with latest version. If using area track, you need to point it at the ground where the target is sitting on.