303_Kermit

Can't wait to fly it online, but I wait untill it starts remotely fly like a P47...

There's no point in gliding on an anvil . It's enough to calculate Wing Surface to Waight ratio: If you take empty P47 it's about 162kg/ m², just to compare ... for He 111 these ratio (calculated same way) is ...99kg/m², and for Bf-109 about 140kg/m² Speed, and agility of P 47 in DCS makes me wonder. I dived yesterday on P47 that was dirclty below me (Storm of War server). with 680kph IAS i dived ... leveled off behind his tail, my speed drops down... 600...580...550....510IAS. P47 was impossible to catch. The Chart below shows that P47 D10 was able to keep 535 kph TAS asuming temperature about 32°C it gives routhly calculated 480IAS... 30 kph slower than i was doing in Bf109. below is the performance chart from: http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/p-47/p-47.html High speed: Intercooler and oil cooler flap neutral, cowl flaps closed; flaps and gear up; 2700 R.P.M. with water injection. Altitude Ft. Manifold Pressure "Hg. Torque Brake Horsepower Turbo RPM Exhaust Back Press. "Hg. Carb. Air Temp. °C True Speed MPH 0 56 2210 7,200 36.0 32.0 333 5,000 56 2265 9,400 33.2 27.0 353 10,000 56 2315 11,600 31.4 23.0 372 15,000 56 2335 13,850 30.3 23.0 390 20,000 56 2325 16,200 30.5 26.0 406 25,000 56 2265 18,650 32.5 33.0 421 30,000 56 2225 21,400 35.7 43.0 433 31,000 56 2220 22,000 36.5 46.0 435 33,000 50.5 2020 22,000 32.0 39.0 430 35,000 45.8 1740 22,000 30.0 32.0 422 38,000 39.0 1550 22,000 25.3 23.0 404

The only problem I have with MiG-15bis is lack of real playground. I live in Europe, so It means that Korea 1952 is for me a kind of desperation. It's empty anyway so we (there's 2 of us, and others are learning) fly Blueflag Coldwar instead, but it's A2G playground mostly. Bad place for MiG 15bis between F5E, AV8B, and lot of Chaprals... We're hungry for combat, but most of the times there's no place to play. Two sewers and both mostly empty

+1

It's a perfect plane for learning purposes. And it will fly properly if ... you will fly him properly. I never use any curves - except of rudder. I admit - my pedals aren't impressive an 15% smooth is necessary. Every other curve stays default. L-39 flies perfectly. I recommend "C" variant , because it feels much lighter while aerobatic. Is very proper in most cases, except of spin - there's unsymmetrical. By good weather you can trim your aircraft so, that F-18 flying nearby will think that you have an autopilot. With my best regards 303_Kermit

thanks! we surely show ourself

If i have to bomb on MiG 15 i use Vertical dive Ju87 Stuka style I workes quite well. Start on 1800m. Aproach your target so, that he slides alongside your canopy. Turn throttle off. When target hides under the wing start to roll. Engage pull to vertical dive exactly over target. Dive shall be about 80°. Place the crisshair under or on the targer. Just before drop pull gently to place a target on the bottom of crosshair circle. If you use zoom 75% as normal drop your bombs when you start to see details of the target (if you can say that it's a Vehicle or a Canon, or a Rocket launcher). 1. Keep a ball in the middle! 2. Don't use rudder to aim the crosshair on target

MiG 15 two ship flight. Combat ready. Europe, Germany ... What's "Special label" ??? Some kind of skin? Me and my wingman are flying MiG 15 exclusively. (with the exception for L39C for training purposes).

I am (and my wingman) flying exclusively on MiG 15. If you want a comparison: -MiG 15 has a lot better engine. It climbs and accelerates way better than F86. Climbing in spiral is better on MiG under every climb speed and angle. -MiG 15 has lot more problems while being in dive. Aeroelastic behavior starts quite early and doesn't allow to pull hard, by Ma 0,91-0,92 it's just straight fight possible. And it's not easy -F86 seems to have ability to turn tighter, while loosing a lot of speed in turn. Mostly It stays inside turn radius of MiG 15, but the longer you stays in turn the worse for F86, since MiG can archive better constant TRT as F86 do, but it's also difficult to master it. -MiG 15 is a lot better on high altitude. Is fast in straight flight, climbs better. -Looping: F86 stays inside a MiG loop and can stay there with similar TRT, nether side can have advantage. P86 looses however a lot faster speed in loop. It's not a big problem, since he can continue loop by quite wide speed range. The problem starts when MiG 15 pilot after first loop , at the top of the second loop reverts to immelman. (yes MiG 15 makes double immelman and he can do it even on very high altitude - i keep as a secret how high, but i won quite a number of duels these way). One one one MiG15 against F86: - with both pilots inexperienced - F86 wins easily - with both pilots experienced turn-fighting modern style - MiG shall prefer nose to tail - with MiG pilot flying energetic style - MiG wins, or disengages freely in over 90% cases Two vs Two I invite you to check it out. Meet us over Persian Gulf. Blue Flag Cold War Campaign. We're patrolling the sky almost everyday.

Me myself with my wingman were waiting yesterday for I think an hour on Korea 1952 with hope, that somebody show up. We're flying Blueflag coldwar PG almost everyday on MiG-15. It's sometimes nerve wrecking experience I must say, but it's never boring. Also Pings are much better for us, since we live in Europe. So... We hope to meet some experienced F86 Pilots over PG in Blue Flag campaign. With my best regards 303_Kermit

Quite annoying bug actually. Also the switch shall be "spring loaded"

I know that it won't help and it's annoying, but ... by me it works just fine.... You set something wrong pal.

The idea is quite simple. Just like IR, radio waves are kind of electro-magnetic wave. It's just a different wave length. If you design a rocket homing on IR signature, you can design a rocket homing on radio(radar) wave signature. It's just different wave length. Idea is just the same as for fox 2 rockets. Only source of signature is different.

R27P /EP Passive Radar (Fox2 ?) R27 EA /EM Fox 3 type R27 Cause all i see in the air is F16/F18 ... booooring....

Thank you very much guys! may I ask what about my two other requests regarding L39? 1. J.P.T Test swich - working incorrect 2. tripple gauge in instructor cockpit?

Hallo I'd like to refresh a topic. There's no improovement in the problem. By the wind of 0-4 m/s blowing from directions 330° - 60° ARK is set to approach RWY 22 instead of 04. In heavy weather conditions approaching AF is impossible since RSBN, ARK are set on RWY 22 and the lights are set to RWY 04. Please Help. Our Regiment operates from Krymsk for 2 years. We created there a "Wirtual flying shool" using L39C Albatros, and we're happy to have a real Air Force instructor-pilot. Currently all the part of program involving a heavy weather condition is impossible to conduct from Krymsk. To be sure i checked if there's a bug in our mission, but i have allways the same results: RSBN and ARK working wrong on Krymsk. With my best regards Kermit

I do have almost every plane in DCS - except of Spitfire and JF17. I fly all the time, MiG-15, MiG-19 , L39c Albatros ... maybe I'll add MiG-29 ... I wait for F4 and F104. Probably i'll quit flying all other planes if I get one those two.

I invite you all to take part in the pool. Maybe if there's enough of us, and somebody will do F104 for us? https://forums.eagle.ru/forum/englis...4g-starfighter

Hallo First - thanks for these awsome plane. Second - bug(s) report: According to L39C manual: "The spring-loaded RT-12 JPT regulator test switch (JPT REG TEST), located on the right panel in the front cockpit, is intended to check system functionality when the engine is not running. It is necessary to press and hold the switch in position I and check if the J.P.T. 700°С warning light is on, indicating normal system operation. Repeat the same for position II – the J.P.T. 730°С indicator will come on" 1. The swich isn't spring loaded as for example "Fire Sig. Test" swich ist. Can you check these please? 2. As it stayes in Manual - Pos "I" - shall trigger 700°C warning light, the second position "II" of these swich shall trigger J.P.T. 730°C warning light - but its not the case. In both positions the swich triggers the same: 700°C warning light. With my best regards Kermit PS. I hope that I placed my thread in correct section.

Hi According to Manual: "In the rear cockpit, the oil temperature gauge is not operational, because there is no temperature sensor." The three point gauge in the rear cockpit shows only oil pressure. Fuel pressure seems to be missing. With my best regards Kermit

Thanks

Hi According to Manual: "In the rear cockpit, the oil temperature gauge is not operational, because there is no temperature sensor." The three point gauge in the rear cockpit shows only oil pressure. Fuel pressure seems to be missing. With my best regards Kermit

Somehow I cannot upload a file. When I try as attachment - a file is to big, when I use option "Upload from URL" it sayes "wrong file". However I managed to upload these file to : https://easyupload.io/q24nmg Let me know if I can be of any help. With my best regards Kermit

Hallo I'd like to report a bug in Krymsk AF. I try to describe as simple as i can. By certain weather setup there appears to be a some kind of error in active runvay setup. As you may know Krymsk has one runway in direction 39/219 (04/22). Default direction is 04, and by the wind 0-4m/s these direction is active. ATC directs you to runway 04, also NDB beacons are set to approach from at 04 direction. Also in night lights are set to approach at 04 direction. But some specific weather conditions makes ATC works wrong: active runway 22 NDB : set to approach/take off on runway 04 RSBN: set to approach to runway 04 ATC : vectors you to runway 22 Runway lights : set to approach on runway 22. Here are weather conditions under which the error appears: NAV Wind Directions (so far getested): sfc wind : 330-60° , 1-4m/s 500m: 330° , 9m/s 2000m: 0° , 6m/s 8000m: 20° , 5m/s the other factors (I think) are irrelevant. In case of any questions please let me know. I can make a propper movie about the bug. With my best regards Kermit

Hallo First - thanks for these awsome plane. Second - bug(s) report: "The spring-loaded RT-12 JPT regulator test switch (JPT REG TEST), located on the right panel in the front cockpit, is intended to check system functionality when the engine is not running. It is necessary to press and hold the switch in position I and check if the J.P.T. 700°С warning light is on, indicating normal system operation. Repeat the same for position II – the J.P.T. 730°С indicator will come on" 1. The swich isn't spring loaded as for example "Fire Sig. Test" swich ist. Can you check these please? 2. As it stayes in Manual - Pos "I" - shall trigger 700°C warning light, the second position "II" of these swich shall trigger J.P.T. 730°C warning light - but its not the case. In both positions the swich triggers the same: 700°C warning light. With my best regards Kermit PS. I hope that I placed my thread in correct section.