GumidekCZ

Did every one of you watched that video into very end? Because no one wrote anything about F-16 Falcon. Seem they already have 3D model ... may be it will come out following Spring ... which one? :D

I really wish to have these key bindings available. FBW RESET BUTTON!!! really needed ASAP UHF and VHF radio Preset channel selector UP/DOWN AXIS to adjust UHF/VHF radio volume If you have another key bindings on your mind... wrote it down here.

I need to search and translate German forum to get answer...:doh: It was bug since day 1 and now its corrected...:thumbup: Gauge should not show increase in pressure by hand pump, but for engine start you still need hand pump to get some fuel into engine. https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=cs&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=de&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php%3Fs%3D6b1568cc879a7702d7a0460d3b0e1f3f%26p%3D2692052%26postcount%3D20&xid=17259,1500004,15700022,15700124,15700149,15700186,15700190,15700201,15700214&usg=ALkJrhjs7cUs1_eEbkPExOfcmhbXi-I66w

Same here, since I dont know when, the hand fuel pump doesnt do anything. Is is a bug! dont know if reported or not. The fuel pressure should rise after few strokes, but didnt.

When I fly north in direction of TACAN station, which is for expample heading 353°, if my actual heading is 002°, than tacan indicator showed full left (less than 350). When I cross 360° and fly for example 358°, than the heading indicator jumps into correct position.

DCS 2.5.3.22877 Open Beta As already stated here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3663892&postcount=13 Plus the missing smoke from solid rocket booster stage of rocket. As also clearly seen on picture from the link. But once again... here is it:

Middle mouse button is very very helpful, but there is still one Bug on ED side: Why is the radar aim marker so down bellow?? This occurs often when plane is closing distance. Check the picture..

I did hit Enter and wait until the brackets were red, but it only gives me aim point probably where fire computer wants me to aim with mouse. But this aim point is most of time way off (behind target movement or 1°~5° under the target). Worse is, the computer is not calculating point where target and missile will met (collision point), but some kind of nonsense... I know you want to help me, but at first, Please, TRY it. get in SA-19 and try to shoot down anything. After that fly F18 low and straight a let AI shoot at you (watch for RWR and outside), you get no hard lock and no smoke outside.

DCS 2.5.3.22176 I’m not able to shoot down any plane other than transport planes. This SAM system in my hands is almost useless. Effective only against helicopters. I’m didn’t found any good from Target Tracking Radar, its only giving me faulty aim point, nothing else. Am I missing some weapon guidance feature? Not mine video, but still same result - very poor chance of kill Another thing I did observed is the rocket booster stage smoke is missing. https://my.pcloud.com/publink/show?code=XZCt097Z5cuQIbldvHSsOq3uH4dHBXq1hljV Solid rocket motor generate some smoke as seen from real video records. WIKI source: http://pvo.guns.ru/tunguska/tunguska.htm Guidance is performed by the target tracking radar, it constantly relays target range, elevation and bearing to the fire-control computer, and on the basis of this data the computer generates the laying commands for the guns or the trajectory corrections for the missiles. A back-up tracking method can be used by the gunner, who uses the 8× magnification (8 degree field of view) 1A29 stabilized sight of the Tunguska to track the target in elevation and azimuth, the altitude or range of the target being set manually. The gunner is initially cued towards the target by the system's search radar.

Hi Rudel, can you please describe what this mean to all of us MiG21 livery makers? What will happen to OUR old liverys? Will we also need to split our old/new textutres? And what about PSD templates, will there be a new ones?

Awesome, I could read news like this every day :thumbup: they are better than in my dreams. Fingers crossed!

What I’m also hoping for with MiG-21 is proper Campaign over Vietnam map against F-4 Phantoms and F-105 Thundershiefs, B-52. It can be bag full of potential money/new-old customers. However, there need to be DCS quality 3D models of all these planes at first.

Many thanks LeCuvier for confirming BUG, please can Adimins shift this into BUG section?

Yesterday, I did night landing in MP with my friends and I depleted battery soon with some of circuits ON after shutdown. Therefore, I thought, that connecting external power would kick my instruments, lights and ignition back alive. Nevertheless, nothing happened at all. Did something wrong or it should be like this, or is it bug?

Similar behaviour already reported with tail wheel: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3650419&postcount=5

Reason to this behaviour is this: FMOptions.lua tailWheelStaticFricK = 0.6 tailWheelSideFricK = 0.2 (WAS 0.5, main wheel has now 0.55) tailWheelRollFricK = 0.025 tailWheelGlideFricK = 0.54 tailWheelMOI = 0.5 I wonder why somebody changed good value into terrible!? Edited: I did changed values of tail back to 0.5 and main G to 0.65 - Works like a charm!! TRY IT!

That kind of response makes me little bit nervous . At least according to my feelings, it could be something not very pleasant, in terms of Magnitude future. But as Kang wrote, Fingers crossed, hopefully only bright future is awaiting to us. EDITED: Found this: So now Im only worried about MiG21, not about the Magnitude. Certainly will patiently wait for next news.

I like quick responds very much, thanks Rudel. With "few things" you ment things about CHE2 or MiG-21 or Magnitude itself??

I love the MiG-21 and I hope that Magnitude will give it love and care it deserve. Nowadays it is theCHRISTEN EAGLE 2, which has almost 100% of Mag workload capacity. So may be after the release of CHE2, the number of people taking care of MiG will raise again. Important question is: WHEN???

I report Data-link text messages lines messed up. When I write multiple lines and send it, it will be received not in same line composition, but lines will be divided. Receiver will never exactly now, what you wanted to write him in first place. Can lead in misreading of crucial information.

Engines running, air should go thru top gills. And finally the HUD, which is very dirty. This picture is not the worst, but when sun is at my back, I cant see even mountain in front of me. I need to move head aside of HUD to see where I'm flying.

Any news here? I dont know, but since last patch I have even bigger problems, that RX axis assigned to RAD ELEV is much more sensitive. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DO SOMETHING WITH THIS. Make the possibility to control RAD ELEV by AXIS with liear function of elev angle, not by exponential function like now it is.

Yeah, it has been more than month since me and SVKSniper send the 3DMAX model with textures depicting the position of welds. Im waiting for any response from -Rudel-. I need this to be implemented soon, to finalize my new liverys. But according recent posts from Rudel, he seems to me commited to another projects (CH Eagle) by 100%.

... My words +1 Hope they will give us this option. Now it is really hard work to operate elevation rapidly and with precision.

This plane is drived by computer, not hydraulics,.... so there is no point in sudden FLAP angle reposition. Will only make pilot work harder. AUTO mode is acording to F/A-18C manual - LINEAR, I think. So why not HALF or FULL. Last patch helped allot, and I know that real plane has slight pitch-up attitude when flaps came down.