Dejjvid

I'd just like a small cue so I know where to focus. I only have a 27" inch monitor. The people flying with 52" and projectors have it far more easy to spot targets.

But it's rarely seen, or my CCIP skills are just too awesome ;) Something that would be really awesome is a few different damage animations. The smoke and WAAAAAIIT FOR IT (Achmed style) explosions is getting old now.

The idea is good. But IMO only use the grey marker until you're close. No text and no different colors. That would ruin the gameplay.

This is gonna be a bigger issue when we get the fast jets. WWIIOL has a nice system, but in DCS i think it'll be too obvious. So i think ED should come up with something in between WWIIOL style labels, and the squares posted in this thread. And make mission designer decide if they're allowed in the current mission.

Slmod or F10 should work as well.

But Wags is tired of commanding filthy amounts of ground forces and is getting ready to release it to us now! :)

What if we just give ED our money and enjoy the products we actually buy? And how about the pre-purchase being cheaper then final?

I wonder if ED love or hate us? :)

Now that we're gonna have a F/A-18 I really hope ED changed their "US fast jet" to a Su-27 or even better, Su-35. Then my life would be fulfilled and I can quit work and do Cobras all day long :)

I agree. This must be the most valid point ever made on ED forums!

Just remove the big spring. AAR. formations and general control is sooo much better now. Even resistence all the way. Here's the vid:

IMHO, a vertical CLIMB is when the aircraft has enough power to pull/push itself in the vertical, without the need to first do a steep dive. There are a few planes that can do a low transition takeoff and go VERTICAL 90 degrees straight up. That's how I define a vertical climb. But I might be wrong.

That part you call 'vertical climb' is not from level flight :) Check @ 2.00 And i saw that actual show, so i saw him dive in getting speed, the climb was performed at my position.

It's been tested, you will achieve maximum roll rate, climb performance etc. etc. as per the -1 if you have a light enough aircraft. I've also seen the A-10C live, and i can perform that show with 1000lbs of fuel too. You can't do it with full tanks. Reaching 300 knots is a piece of cake to reach if you are kinda empty. you won't get up to 300 knots with maximum takeoff weight in level flight and some altitude.

You can do that in several ways. 1. With TAD as SOI: Place the cursor on the location you want the markpoint then do TMS right short. 2. With TGP as SOI: TMS right short In fact, i think almost every sensor can create a mark point. But i only use TAD + TGP, and overhead marks. OH marks are created with the mark (MK?) button on the UFC. Edit: I just misread the entire post. I will punish my self later on.

50% deadzone on the brakes does the trick.

+1 on Rivverns vote. Remove the bugged missions and release. (ps. Masterarms love your work ds.)

Until DCS:CA sells 10 million copies, don't expect SB PE fidelity. Try to convince eSim to develop a Leopard or M1A2 for DCS:World. And try to convince BIS to develop DCS:Soldier. Then we're talking some cool shiznit.

You can use your voice or your keyboard. Telepathy isn't really working atm. It's coming soon

After the announcement we still have to wait 6 months. I hope they announce it the same day as open beta is available.. :)

I was the host. Still couldn't see the F10 menu. But I'm gonna check again while there's no task active.

Superb mission. Probably the best I've played in a-10c! I've tested it alone and with a 2 ship flight. We're gonna test it on our squad night on Thursday with more players. I agree with a rearming base closer to the operation area. And the F10 menu doesn't work when you have a task. This is probably working as intended, but would be a nice feature to be able to check out with the ground forces if you go Winchester during a task.

But we can see MGRS coords easy in the 'map' view right?

The only thing ED should do is to provide a way for the TARS team to detect when a user is in a vehicle, and what frequency the user has set. And frequency isn't even mandatory, it can be set with TARS. So if TARS can detect when a user is in a vehicle, they can add it. Don't waste resources on built in voice comms. Teamspeak and Ventrilo has been polished and refined for 10 years. No way that ED can quick fix a solution that out performs TS3/Vent. And btw, I'm quite confident that TARS's already exists for CA. ExcessiveHeadspace is a tester IIRC. Edit: btw, IVC for Falcon is a proof that game developers shouldn't develop VC software. When it works it's quite good. But there's a high probability for a FUBAR moment.

Moahaha, i really hope they use the F404-GE-402 engines and the latest block upgrades that were used 1999 when they shut down the F/A-18C line. :joystick::joystick::joystick::joystick::joystick::joystick::joystick::joystick::joystick::joystick: