VR Flight Guy in PJ Pants

Thanks for the reply. Understand the HMD issue. VT was out there but GD is not releasing it. Which is a shame.

I wish to brought up the notion on HMD and thrust vectoring. I know the former may be able to do (c.f. JAS-39C) and the latter is definitely out there. Too bad GD probably very busying making their first official module...

aka. Boomer!

We can only do "text attack" here, so sorry.

Have faith, my fried. This is the Year of Strike Eagle!!!

I dunno if ED was ready or not. Addition: MB-339 was claimed to be ready and was sent to ED for code reviews, but after that message, the module finally released almost a year later.

Definitely not today, even though I hoped it were.

Any work on the F-14 series? The default cockpit texture actually tore the performance down.

For so many years, there was nothing winter for V1, so I would wait and see.

I got just the opposite in the beginning...

Well, you can reduce the flares to zero Try my BFM trainers. My problem is some planes tend to kiss the ground more often than the others.

Not persist here neither.

IIRC, this map does not have any winter like version 1.0

First of all, it is not a rant. As an end user, I appreciated all the work done for most of the mods, people worked in their free time, mostly for free and brought us some of the most marvellous and amazing range of aircrafts (and some time vehicles) and many of them are still right in my mod list. Some of them even managed to become official modules. Second, it is not about abandonware. Each of the mods was unique. The mod makers were also unique in their own situation. Yes, there were mods which were abandoned due to reasons of any kind. There was no commitment, unless otherwise specified. ED might not love every single one of them and not incorporating them into the official part of the system, but as long as we were enjoying them, I had not issue with this. Thirdly, it is about the future. I saw many talents and some of them were magical -- from a person who did coding for a living would mean something I guess. Well, I know many possessed some skills that were truly unique -- e.g. creating the HMD display on UH-60L out of the blue, vector thrusting on various projects. I think it would have be a waste for many of these technical skills could benefit other models. I sincerely hoped there could have been more exchanges of skill around. It would flourish the community and benefited the user at the end. And for a more sensitive subject -- money. This was a very complicated subject. I knew direct donation might be a way, but it would make the relationship between the donor and the mod maker more complicated. I would personally like to see more mods outside the use of FC3, e.g. the F-16I projects. Instead of giving money directly, it might be a way to "crowdfund" an official module to a community or individual for modding. Just my silly and unfiltered thoughts. Thank you for read this till the end.

Thanks

Thanks. More question: Is there a way to turn ASW off all the time? Or at least every time I go into Oculus Link mode automatically? I need to run a script every time to do so.

Are you using OTT to set this? what about the resolution used in the headset? Thanks

Looking at the vid, it seems someone has the same concern as I do...

I am a bit tempted now to get a Mustang now for getting some Maverick vibe.

Need QP footages!!!

Well, it is better than using a LAN cable or WiFi (you know which headset I was talking here)

1. Price! Even at £990.00 (over Amazon from time to time), I cannot shell this amount out 2. It is Meta, some may have negative impression on this company,

Are they the same/similar technology? If I am using Quest, should I care/worry about Motion Projection? Especially in terms of OpenXR

Was it the old one a few years back? If so, it was made by a Japanese modder but pulled it for "better version", which I did not heard again since then.

2-week and counting.