Kuky

What do you mean by "missiles are now being subjected to constant forces they weren't designed for"? You saying missiles are not designer to widthstand a few G's? :doh: At the end of the day, if this was such a huge problem that you make it out to be surely people that design aircraft (professionals) wouldn't have done it. :music_whistling: You don't think they weigh the pro's and cons of each setup, design and what not?

There is already a way to filter out higher requencies by editing .sdef files but there is no way to filter out lower frequencies, so as I also have a ButtKicker, and while back I wanted to do this also, I have now placed a feature request to ED to add ability to add a low frequency filter also in these .sdef files... so fingers crossed they can do it and have time to do it.

Well yeah, could be other reason(s) other than to reduce drag, only way to know for sure is to ask the manufacturer. :)

Most likely to reduce air drag (at particular speed), air doesn't flow parallel to aircraft, as it hits the nose and rest of the fuselage parts, it changes direction and creates high pressure pushing out air more distanst from the aircaft also... but then this creates lowe pressure further down along the aircraft frame... making the air suck in closer... so basically air curves in and out around the airframe, and at that part where the fueltanks are attached, is most likely where air travels towards the airframe, so they angle fueltank to follow this air stream.

This is Community News section... and no, it's not the right place to ask this question, which by the way was asked many times before. If there was some news it would be posted.

^^^^ This is what it means, network code was not scaled linearly to number uf users connected to the server. Server (outgoing) and client (incoming) trafic vs clientsQTY (kB/sec): Server___Client1__Client2__Client3 40_________40 150________75_____75 330_______110____110______110 With 1 client both server and client had same BW used (40) With 2 clients you would expect that server would be having double the BW (2x40) and each client would have 40, but it was more than that. You can imagine how much more BW each client would need to have with lot of people connected... but it should still be 40 (I think, but I could be wrong). Anyway, this is now according to ED fixed in this open beta patch... and looks like it will help reduce BW used (which should be awesome if it works) so please test it.

lines 3 and 4... these values are in bits (8 bits = 1 Byte, 100Mbps = 100x1024x8 bits) not sure which one is upload which one download this ADLS 10240 setting seems to be 160 / 64 KByte Try this value for both (up and down), I think this is for 100/100Mbps line which you say you have guaranteed, I really wonder if it will help 104857600,

I like that shot of C-101.. nice

You know it could also (quite likely) be that actual network throughput (due to network congestion) is less than 100Mbps. The 100/100Mbps connection you have for the server is most likely not guaranteed BW, it is just the max you can have at any time, and at times of high internet traffic, there is good chance that network is congested. Do a test if you can for that server you have, try download and upload large file, and check for BW utilization especially at peak hours (evenings).

I disable ASC only when I stall it due to high AoA and too low speed (lets me have better control to recover from the stall). I am now to flying the Flanker trimmed down even before I roll for take off (about 60-70% trim down) and adjust trim more as I gain higher speed (600-800kmph IAS).

Did you set DCS network options setting to LAN?

Guys... THIS IS NOT A JOKE! ED is really making a DCS X-Wing Fighter The force is not strong with you :( :pilotfly:

Nice built BIGNEWY About the fans, IF you have air filters on fans, it is better to have more air blown IN then sucked out (by the fans), and reason is minimal dust in case ;) By having more fans blowing in, you create higher air pressure inside the case, not allowing any dust to be sucked into the case through MANY little holes and gaps that exist in all cases. I have this setup on my PC and in many years I used it I have never had to cleat the case or componenets from dust. I recomend this to anyone. The air filters I use are super fine mesh ones and any dust build up is on the filters which are easily cleaned.

Oh my... I cannot believe how stupid and clueless some people are :megalol:

I need to kidnap one of you guys to make a pit for me :)

Long awaiting the MiG-29 here also... well keep on waiting

Good luck, and translate well :smilewink:

I noticed this also, I am pretty sure its because when you ground stabilise the piper and want to move it, the aircraft nose is not stable and moves around in respect to ground stabilisation point... so when you want to move the piper right and aircraft nose is moving left, the piper moves right in respect to aircraft nose, but if nose is moveing more left in respect to locked point on ground, the piper will appear to move left also in respect to locked point on ground. I don't know if this is realistic though... I would hope not For now, at least untill this is fixed try to keep nose stabilised when adjusting the piper and don't let the piper move on HUD before you start adjusting. I just checked, this bug is already reported (Bug #28839)

Awesome render shots!

The light when using R-60M does work (seeked needs to lock onto heat source, not just have radar lock with missile selected). Use FiO mode for them. The other 2 light I forgot how they should work, maybe when missile is selected and locked onto target.

LOL :megalol: Now on the serious side... are we there yet?

Not at all, I have GTX980 with 4GB VRAM and its enough for 4K resolution.

Girls have their own catcy phrases like "'cause you're worth it" to justify spending money on makeup and what not, why can't we have one for us guys also, he? ;)

You hang in there... you are doing good and I among many others will get your HOTAS grips :) Good things take time and are most importantly... WORTH WAITING FOR!

There are much more worse things you could be spending money on :)