504 Wolverine

http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/su-27/su-27_var.htm This outlines the different Su-27 variants and it states, as you say, that the Su-27SMK phase 1 & 2 is capable of carrying the R-77. The variant modeled in Lock-On is the Su-27S which CANNOT carry the R-77

Sounds like one of your mods has enabled this. Just like IRL, the Su-33 in 1.12a cannot carry the R-77.

Colt, See my posts on this subject here in this thread. http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=12510&page=2 I offered to repack the skins but never heard from the author. I would offer to do it again but as you know, my injuries from my accident limit the amount of time I can spend at my PC at the moment. If you still need it done when I can, I will be more than happy to do it. :)

Pilotasso: I really doubt that this will be changed on the server. First it would have to be agreed by the community that it is realistic, then agreed by the Squadron that it is in the communities best interest that the change is made and even after this it is down to Zorlac (our server owner) to decide wether or not he should make the change. One example would be the 6xR-77's for the MiG-29S has been agreed by the community and even by the 504th as a squad (its even in my squad skin pack mod) but we have yet to impliment it to the server. As Kenan has said, it is his and Breakshots view that the Su-33 should carry 4xR-27T/ET's. It is mine and Gazehounds view that it should not. So far all the evidence points to 2 T/ET's only. So until evidence from a credible source is shown that it can carry 4 then I am sure that the server will continue to only allow 2. Our Squadron takes pride that it is able to identify, name and then ban anyone that uses "illegal" loadouts and I'm sure that we will continue to do this. http://www.syn-ack.com/vvs504/stats/vvs504-hall-of-shame.shtml

How do you work that out? There were a total of 10 Sea harriers/Harriers lost. These were; 23rd April - Sea Harrier - Shot down by radar controlled 35mm AAA 6th May - 2 Sea harriers - Collided with each other in bad weather 21st May - Harrier GR.3 - Shot Down by Blowpipe SAM 23rd May - Sea Harrier - Exploded on take-off and crashed into sea 27th May - Harrier GR.3 - Shot down by radar controlled 35mm AAA 29th May - Sea Harrier - Slid of deck as ship turned into wind 30th May - Harrier GR.3 - Shot down by small arms fire 1 June - Sea Harrier - Shot down by Roland SAM 8 June - Harrier GR.3 - Heavy landing due to engine failure NO Sea Harriers/Harrier GR.3 were shot down by any Argentinian aircraft. Where as; 1 May - Mirage IIIAE - FAA Grupo 8 - Shot Down by Flt Lt Barton RAF in No.801 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder 1 May - Mirage IIIAE - FAA Grupo 8 - Damaged by Lt Thomas in No.801 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder then shot down by own air defences (Ouch :icon_lol: ) 1 May - Dagger A - FAA Grupo 6 - Shot Down by Flt Lt Penfold RAF in No.800 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder 1 May - Canberra B.62 - FAA Grupo 2 - Shot down by Lt Curtiss RN in No.801 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder 21st May - Pucara - FAA Grupo 3 - Shot Down by Cmdr Ward RN in Sea Harrier of No.801 NAS using 30mm cannon 21st May - 2 A-4C - FAA Grupo 4 - Shot down by Lt Cmdr Blissett and Lt Cmdr Thomas RN in No.800 Sea Harriers using Sidewinders 21st May - Dagger A - FAA Grupo 6 - Shot down by Lt Cmdr Frederiksen RN in No.800 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder 21st May - 2 Dagger A - FAA Grupo 6 - Shot down by Lt Thomas and a third by Cmdr Ward RN in No.801 Sea Harriers using Sidewinders 21st May - A-4Q - CANA 3 - Shot down by Lt Morell RN in No.800 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder 21st May - A-4Q - CANA 3 - Shot down by Flt Lt Leeming RAF in No.800 Sea Harrier using 30mm cannon 23rd May - Dagger A - Grupo 6 - Shot down by Lt Hale RN in No.800 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder 24th May - 2 Dagger A - Grupo 6 - Shot down by Lt Cmdr Auld in No.800 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder 24th May - Dagger A - Gupo 6 - Shot down by Lt D Smith in No.800 Sea Harriers using Sidewinder 1st June - C-130E Hercules - FAA grupo 1 - Shot down by Cmdr Ward RN in No.801 Sea Harrier using Sidewinder and 30mm cannon 8 June - 2 A-4B - FAA Grupo 5 - Shot down by Flt Lt Morgan RAF in No.800 Sea Harrier using Sidewinders 8 June - A-4B - FAA Grupo 5 - shot down by Lt D Smith in No.800 NAS Sea Harrier using Sidewinder NOW I dont know about you but I count 20 aircraft shot down by Sea Harriers. The exact opposite of what you said. So the moral = Make sure you are right before trying to start a flame war. :horseback:) EDIT - Just noticed the Invincible bit - ROLFMAO - Christ, best joke Ive ever heard in a long while - BTW Someone should tell the Royal Navy that it was sunk, because it was still in service until last August. lolol http://www.royal-marines.mod.uk/static/pages/1469.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invincible_class_aircraft_carrier#HMS_Invincible_.28R05.29

Should the Su-33 be able to carry 4 R-27ET = No What's Zorlac's take on this? It's his decision after all.

Do russian airfields have these signs?

Unless ED or a member of the community makes a dedicated model of the dual rocket rack (for both UB-13 & S-25) then it is not possible. Myself and Alfa have both tried this.

Bump. Seems there's a lot of new guys asking this question. Even though it's a guide it was originally placed in the bug forum because new pilots think that it's a bug when their options won't stay to what they selected when starting a campaign.

He sits in the glazed area just before the nose cone. It was a ramjet test aircraft. Very ahead of its time considering the idea was conceived in 1938, first glide tests in 1946 and first powered flights in 1949.

The phantom is already included in Lock-on where as the Mig-21 is not. So ......... :horseback:icon_axe::icon_lol:

Well all the old hands knew that the March deadline would not be met. Afterall it is a planned release date, not one that is set in stone.

So is 1.2 going to include WAFM afterall? If so, WOOHOO :D Thanks for the heads-up Wags.

Because its the RVV-AE. The R-77 is a different missile

the flanker modeled in lock-on (Su-27S) cannot carry the R-77. The Su-27SM/SMK phase 1 can carry the R-77 The Su-33 is a navalised Su-27S and also cannot carry the R-77 http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/su-27/su-27_var.htm Also the R-27AE never got past the prototype stage due to politics (R-27 is made by Ukraine)

Christ, guys. Give it a break. your just repeating the same arguments over and over again. Its stuff like this that makes me want to quit Lock-on for good. :icon_evil When military hardware is modelled, there are things that cannot be included. Especially for a russian company trying to model western systems. This does not mean that the sim is anti-western/pro-russian.

lol, yeah just slow :p check out the US truck (M818?) amd hummer since 1.1. :)

Oh the drama. :icon_lol:

Taxi to the parking area, you cannot refuel or rearm on the runway (or roads either ;)) To refuel, switch your engines off.

Well the RWR bug is annoying, especially with sam's but IMHO pressing Shift R a few times is outweighed by the Phantasmgoria and ECM pods getting correct drag values. Staying with 1.12 here. I also believe that when ED fix the bug, (if it's possible) just repack the 1.12 patch to include the fix. All these version numbers and hot fixes can be confusing.

Its the new Ah-1 model. :) Remember guys, Lock-on cannot handle 2 seaters. :(

All seems well when adding over 1.11

Unfortunatley, yes. A trade off in getting the new controller system.

lol. yeah same here. :)

It is advisable to uninstall all addons istalled via modmam and reinstall them after patching, but you do not need to uninstall/reinstall modman itself. saying that I forgot to uninstall the 504th su-25T squad pack but seems the MEinit file is changed so I had to make a new version of it anyways.:icon_conf