Jump to content

upyr1

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4382

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Everything posted by upyr1

  1. upyr1
    When I first saw the thread I was thinking of a map with up to 4 coalitions. which would be fine as long as we can give each side rules of engagement. The Syrian Civil war would be a good example of how complex war can be
  2. upyr1
    this would be awesome
  3. upyr1
    Most of the maps are a good reason
  4. upyr1
    I have issue getting it to work, and even if it did it doesn't work with artillery
  5. upyr1
    The only way to get artillery to fire at a target is the fire at point command in the advanced waypoint action. I'd love to see artillery improved. First as I stated in this thread I'd love the option to use the visual recon mode to spot targets and call in artillery and air strikes. Next I'd love to see AI FAC/FO both ground and air units calling in artillery and airstrikes
  6. upyr1
    This would be great for the Jef
  7. upyr1
    Make sure you allow it in DCS options and bind a key for it. My understanding the current visual recon mode was designed to mark targets on the f10 map for multiplayer missions, not to direct artillery and AI airstrikes.
  8. upyr1
    that'll be aswesome
  9. upyr1
    It would be cool to spot targets for AI
  10. upyr1
    Only if we get a way to fly fac or forward observer for ai.
  11. upyr1
    That would be ideal
  12. upyr1
    If I had my dream F/A-18 module we'd get a block 1 Super bug since it I believe avionics wise it would be identical to what we have. Then the most high tech Hornet we could get and possibly the F Then a storm bird C, and maybe an A. I don't think all that is likely to happen so at least the C lot 20 we have, a block 1 super bug and a more advanced version. As I'm thinking the block 1 super bug would basically be our current Hornet with a different flight model
  13. upyr1
    The default radius should be based on a realistic CEP for the given plane type, technology used, experience level, and altitude. For example a B-17 would have a huge CEP while an F-16 would be a lot smaller. Next when you give a target an area bigger than the CEP the crew will try to aim for a target inside the target zone. This way we have a system that will work for all eras and not just WWII.
  14. upyr1
    I believe so, they were both produced together from 1995 to 2000. McDonnell-Douglas tried to maintain as much commonality between the two planes as possible. The Superbug's range requirement resulted in them having different airframes the cockpit and avionics were almost identical.
  15. upyr1
    Any chance we could at least get the different names and camouflage measures in the livery menu? Also how hard do you think it would be to convert the WWII model into a Korean War SCB-27 for any potential Korean war module?
  16. upyr1
    I'd like the link. I'd love to fly the harrier or helicopters off that thing
  17. upyr1
    They are planning to do that. I'd love it if ED were to improve Combined Arms like that. I've suggested in the past that instead of Asset packs they should have naval and land modules
  18. upyr1
    I'm assuming ED will do that. Now the next question is when the FF Eagle comes out, would someone who gets the FF Eagle and has an ED campaign for the FC Eagle get the FF version free?
  19. upyr1
    I believe we are getting the Iowa-class battleships as part of the pacific asset pack, is there any chance we could at least get the 1980s configuration? Though a 1960s New Jersey would be awesome too
  20. upyr1
    Listening to the fighter pilot podcast with Vincent "Jello" Aiello who flew both, I had the impression that the biggest difference between an early model Super Hornet and a late model Legacy Hornet would be the flight model. I don't know how much work it takes to develop a new flight model but as you brought up HB I might point out that it looks like they might be planning at least 2 Phantom modules the E and probably the J. In both case you'll have a similar two similar planes with slightly different cockpits, avionics, and flight modules. Anyway as I have said in the ED or any other developer thinks two aircraft that are supposed to be variants of each other are too different to be in the same module, then they should at least offer a bundle pack.
  21. upyr1
    Production.
  22. upyr1
    I almost wrote the Thud was a hermaphrodite.
  23. upyr1
  24. upyr1
    No, the EF-105F was a designation that was proposed for the F-105F Wild Weasel. I don't belive It was never used. I used it as I was hoping it would focus on the fact I was talking about the Wild Weasel
  25. upyr1
    I think we would need improvements to the EW modeling to even get an Ai Wild Weasel. Two variants of the F saw combat the original Wild Weasels and the Combaat nails. The EF-105F would have some of the same issues as the G but what is available for the Combat nails? I figure the ideal situation for a module or mod would be the D, Combat nails F and G I think a foia request is in order worst thing that will happen is they say no
×
×
  • Create New...