upyr1
-
Posts
4319 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by upyr1
-
Can you clarify what the situation is with the source code? I've heard conflicting stories on this, I believe after the Hawk Fiasco that ED had plans to take over module source code if anyone left I have also heard that wasn't the case.
-
This is the right answer. No matter what ED does someone is going to complain. There is a lot of things that ED needs to do, there are bugs that need to be fixed, we also need more assets, and we also need more modules. -
I'm asking ED about that
-
I'd love to get some updates here
-
I understand due to the nature of EW some things will never be modeled, however, I know some time ago there was talk about an EW/IADS module. I know that's gone silent, however I'd love to see something worked out so we could have AI jammers, Wild Weasels and a better AID
-
Improving DC's AI so we have an integrated air defense system would be ED's job, so I didn't mention it here. I'm not saying it shouldn't be done I'm just saying its ED's job not HBs
-
Yes. Same with Heatblur's shades. The tint code works for the mig-21
-
This is why I'm specifically asking for AI Weasels, as I expect that EW is too classified for an FF Wild Weasel and even if I am wrong about that, I'm not sure if there is enough interest to justify a G module (I'd buy it if it were possible). Anyway as an AI asset, we would get the G in DCS with the minimum effort. The only things HB would need to worry about with an AI G is changing the payload and antennae on their E model and ad a line about an HTS if it would change the AI's behavior.
-
Any idea on when the historical mode bug will get fixed, now that we have both F-110s I plan to build some 1970s missions with historic mode on.
-
It would have been nice to have Jester AI
-
Thanks for posting and the awesome modules.
-
Depending on your point of view that would be the best and second best possible outcome. Best, as I think the F-15E would benefit greatly from the inclusion of Jester and Iceman, second best becuse it means the Razbam situation didn't get settled.
-
Is asking for SEPECAT Jaguar a good idea ? Or not.
upyr1 replied to DmitriKozlowsky's topic in DCS Core Wish List
It depends on whether or not you want to see the Jaguar in DCS. If you do then ask away, the worst thing that will happen is no developer will work on it the best thing that happens you'll have some developer contact you to be a tester. The Jag would be cool. -
I'm not reading too much into it. I have studied Russian a bit as well, and I got the impression the person posting simply doesn't have an answer . I'm also not reading too much into anything from Razbam that isn't a flat-out yes or no. Developers come and go all the time. Anyway This question really isn't about the specifics of the Razbam/ED disputes as much as it is about ED's general policies if a developer leaves and Razbam simply got me thinking about it. I hope the situation can be resolved soon. I don't know how big DCS is for Razbam but I don't think it is a small slice of their pie. So it would hurt everyone involved
-
Taking over a module would be a challenge, however losing a popular module would be devastating to DCS. I hope the mess with Razbam gets cleared up
-
I am hoping to get the answer from ED. Right now if a developer leaves DCS, would we be SOL? Would ED take over their modules or could another developer do so? For example if Razbam dropped could Heatblur potentially take over the Strike Eagle?
-
First ever DCS: F-4E Phantom II Feedback Thread - May 22nd 2024
upyr1 replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
Awesome job, So far my wishlist of what I would love to see added Enable Jester to fly while refueling- it might be considered a cheat by some but the backseater had controls and I've read at least one F-4 pilot say it was easier from the WSO seat Add jester context function to the AGM-65 (if this is already done but I'm just missing it let me know) -
The only usaf fighter in dcs that might be able to make a carrier landing would be the F-4. Even that is questionable because the landing gear are different The F-16 or F-5 should have their tailhooks ripped out
-
Someone else has brought up the issue of hard wing vs slated I will also bring up the fact that Robin Olds flew the F-4C and according to a late Phantom pilot I followed the later variants had a slightly lower thrust to weight ratio do to more avionics. I would agree we need someone to provide some feedback here. I hope we can get a Greek or Turkish pilot to comment on the flight model.
-
Can we get Jester to aim the AGM-65 with the context menu?
upyr1 posted a topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
Unless I am missing something becuse I didn't read the manual, it doesn't seem like we can get Jester to operate the AGM-65, any plans to add this ability? -
I was wondering if we could pick a favorite helmet?
-
I would like to see them removed from the list but show based on the user's performance settings
-
I have heard you couldn't fire the gun pods and nose gun at the same time. Last night I was flying a Chico load out and was able to do that. So I added a third gun pod. So was the F-4 pilot not remembering things right as he never saw the need or is this a bug?
-
the Dog sabre would be awesome. Seeing the Italian nickname was Kappone I hope someone does a livery with Al.
