Jump to content

Highwayman-Ed

ED Closed Beta Testers Team
  • Posts

    1749
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Highwayman-Ed

  1. Same here, SweViver says they went away after a while, but they're damned annoying when every module presents this error; It takes me 5 minutes to launch DCS this way and when I do the GUI is so small, only shows the DCS logo...
  2. Yeah, it's one of very very many on the Russian forums that don't seem to be available anywhere... :(
  3. My 2 cents, I have no concerns or lack of faith / trust in them, and I enjoy the Harrier for what it is today.
  4. As for why, simple... Logistics missions. A lot of people questioned what the Huey would do in DCS and then the CTLD script came along and it became a serious contender for a lot of people. I'd say the same opportunities exist for this aircraft. There are a lot of scenarios where logistics support could be implemented in missions, and these guys already have everything they need to develop the aircraft in DCS. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see a C-27, C-123, C-130, C-141, AN-12 but this one could be the one to open the doors for other developers to bring their talents to DCS. For everybody who doesn't like them, can you say you wouldn't like escorting one on a multiplayer server or hunting them down to prevent the capture of an airfield?
  5. I’m keeping my fingers tightly crossed that OctopusG who just dropped the I-16 on us bring us their An-2.
  6. Seems to only kick in for me when the shadow quality is above medium, and only flickers in the left eye.
  7. Have you actually purchased the module?
  8. Highwayman-Ed

    An2

    Congrats on your first module guys! Now please, please, please bring us your An-2!
  9. Definitely some more 60’s and 70’s assets, Tu-16 immediately springs to mind along with the An-12, Su-15 on the Russian side and B-57, C-123 and Hawker Hunter on the allies side
  10. I support the decision to delay it until it's ready and release the AI first. Good luck to you!
  11. Anyone got the AN-26?
  12. For the Deck equipment, I made an entry treating those models as Airplanes in DCS which is the only way to be able to place them on the deck. Try this mod for getting the weapons on the deck US Navy Bomb trailers, I've tried to get permission from the mod author to include their mod within the US Navy Deck Equipment mod but have not been able to contact them.
  13. As long as the muppets don't think you were being serious in this movie and appreciate it for a great sense of humor that it is, you'll be fine :)
  14. Sweet!
  15. Haven't laughed like that for a while, good on you boys :)
  16. Hey guys, You've done an awesome job bringing some extra aircraft and assets to the game with the Harrier, would it be possible for you to do the same with this module? I ask as Eagle Dynamics are always working on their's, but it's a slow haul and with the MiG-19 being a 1960's era plane, it would be awesome if you guys could bring some other 1960's era AI content along with it. Specifically, I'm thinking along the lines of the An-12 Cub and the Tu-16 Badger. They'd fit in very very nicely with missions and campaigns for the era and DCS is sorely missing a lot of assets from this period. Anyways, great job on the MiG-19!
  17. The link seems to be broken again :(
  18. Unfortunately no. There are trigger options available to set the bort number via an argument call, defined way back in 1.2ish, but it hasn't worked for a long time... https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=213994
  19. Hey Guys, Am I missing something, or do tanker commands always go to Texaco? We've stuck a couple of tankers in our mission, Shell (KC-135) and Texaco (S-3), but whenever we use VAICOM for tanker commands, they always go to Texaco, regardless if we prefix with "Texaco" or "Shell" Edit: Perfect timing it seems, there was an update to VAICOM over the past couple of days that seems to have resolved it!
  20. Nice mod buddy, makes it much easier to scan your caution panel in VR!
  21. He does know that it's the 4th of April today right and not the 1st... :music_whistling:
  22. This is a VoiceAttack issue with loading of plugins. Currently you cannot load a plugin based on profile, they all load based on your selections in the plugin manager. I know exactly what you mean though, it would be nice to link them so I don't have to keep enabling and disabling them between Vaicom and EDDI...
  23. It's just Windows being overly protective in this case. You should see a 'More Info' link, and once you click that a "Run Anyway" button appears.
×
×
  • Create New...