SharpeXB

“Growing” is a relative thing. Linux still only has a +/- 2% market share for gaming. I can’t see how it would be cost effective to add compatibility and ongoing support for such small numbers. Very large games could absorb such costs but I imagine DCS is too small for this.

Check these out. They’re the only campaigns like it that I’m aware of but are really great. It would be cool to have these for other modules. https://forum.dcs.world/forum/381-a-10c-basic-flight-training-qualification-dlc/ https://forum.dcs.world/forum/422-a-10c-advanced-aircraft-training-qualification-campaign/

Yeah unfortunately the current system is exploitable by players who don’t care that it makes their game look terrible. It’s a simple hack to just lower your resolution and make the dots bigger. And see aircraft easily at unrealistic ranges.

Terrorists would have nothing to fear from armored vehicles today. We’ll just assume DCS “modern” is set in the pre-drone era.

Yeah DCS does not support Frame Generation.

Just in the game itself. I’ve used it in MSFS24 and Cyberpunk

Not sure why it would matter, it’s just generating extra frames regardless. I’m using it in games that are both CPU or GPU limited and it works in both.

It’s a fair idea. But even in the near-modern era simulated in DCS ground vehicles are obsolete rolling coffins. They’re just cannon fodder for a multitude of aircraft and weapons. So they wouldn’t be much fun.

I’m sure it does What’s unfortunate is DCS does not even come close to showing what that screen can do. Try some more current HDR capable games are see

Oh the Hornet could definitely do with an updated model and cockpit on the level with the newer modules. It’s sad that by the time a module gets finished it’s ready for a refresh because it’s so dated by that point.

Yeah I find the phenomenon of shiny screens to be about the dumbest thing ever done to TVs (a tie with soap opera refresh rates). It makes them into a giant mirror and is just super distracting. It’s just done to make them more appealing in showrooms since it makes the blacks appear darker. Fortunately monitors seem to universally have matte screens. The LG OLED mentioned above has a matte screen. Another contributor to its 10/10 score IMO

I think Nvidia has been doing that for a while now. https://www.theverge.com/2012/12/6/3735904/nvidia-geforce-experience-a-tool-to-automatically-optimize-pc-game

I’m not sure how correct the DCS counter is but I’ll take it at face value. I do see a boost if I enable DLSS so that would confirm that I’m GPU limited.

I’m just running all the settings at the highest. At 2160x3840 and 120Hz. That will max a 4090

I’m not sure of a good reason to do that. You would just be limiting an otherwise strong system for no purpose. There’s nothing wrong with 60 FPS but if that’s all you want you could save the money on your components. Otherwise you aren’t getting what you paid for. If your display is capable of a higher refresh rate then use if. That’s not always the case. For example I am GPU limited in DCS with the specs below, running 4K at 120 Hz. It depends on the settings. Some are CPU dependent and some are not.

My guess would be that VR is more demanding on the CPU since it’s drawing dual images. So that bottleneck means the GPU isn’t being utilized fully.

A Catch-22 because the nature of the game makes it difficult. That’s an indicator that these civy sims must have 10-50x as many customers. (Note these nor the game is free) Yet they don’t need any such trainers to attract them. There are all sorts of other reasons DCS is a niche.

Some of these cost as much as DCS and the game isn’t free either. I think that it would indeed be necessary to change the heart of the game in order to popularize it. Just compare DCS to the popular air combat games and note the differences.

Honestly it sounds like you’re trying to force people to play the game who really just don’t want to. DCS doesn’t appeal to everyone. And that’s ok.

I realize that. I was venturing that if ED tried to make DCS appeal to the masses that would mean simplifying the game or adding gamey features that the core sim audience likely wouldn’t find acceptable. So in the end this will always be a niche game which is fine, that’s how the players like it. But you can do this by yourself without a tandem cockpit. You can play along online and do things like share screens etc. Literally having a trainer style aircraft isn’t necessary. And these already exist in the game and are already free to try. Anyone can get a feel of what the game is like with the free aircraft that are already in the game. There isn’t an obstacle in this regard. A primary benefit of dual controls in the real world is the ability to feel what the instructor is doing with them. That’s not possible in a PC game or maybe it would be with FFB but a beginner isn’t going to have hardware like that. In terms of flying they’re actually more complex but don’t have combat systems, in that regard they’re less so. But in terms of these “obstacles” to broad appeal they’re the same. Yet they’re much more popular and without any multiplayer “trainers”. Those players don’t seem to have any trouble jumping right into the game. The reasons that CFS games are so niche is due to other factors IMO

Well if you figure this is a niche genre then by definition the majority of people out there aren’t interested. That is what it is. Hey if the Devs can figure out a way to popularize DCS, great! But I don’t think this is it. Again civy flight sims are very popular and have all the same “problems” yet that doesn’t seem to affect their popularity. So what is it with CFS games? But in order to do anything with a free module they’ll need to do that. They’ll also need to install the game and configure that too. If someone is too mentally feeble to assign a joystick, this isn’t the game for them. Note how console games have every command pre-assigned. That’s what the typical gamer is like, they aren’t savvy enough to do anything more. Which is amazing to me. Again to do even this they’ll need to do all the setup. And anyone I can imagine starting into a game is going to want to fly the plane themselves. I’ve shown DCS to quite a few people and none would find it interesting at all to just ride along. Certainly. Realize that DCS doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It’s within a whole spectrum of sim and flying games. I’m sure many people find their way into more complex sims after starting out in simpler games. So the whole path doesn’t have to exist here. Simplifying DCS too much to appeal to novice players is sorta counterproductive. For myself I started with arcade style flying games, moved on to more sim-type games, then discovered DCS on a Steam sale and got hooked. I suspect that’s not uncommon.

Yes I was going to say that too but it’s outside the spec the OP listed. I agree it’s about the best monitor available today. Hey if you’re looking at 45” screens maybe just go a bit larger.

Well like NL just said, it’s too high value to give away. That question has already been asked and answered, not even the topic here really. DCSW is free, so just have a separate install to trial modules with. If trials are something anyone really wants so much they can convert away from Steam altogether.

How are you privy to EDs sales figures? Well again, every aircraft in this game has a free trial. This has been discussed before. “no plans” to give this away since it’s too high-value…