pepin1234

in the web store only tell there are some limitation when using only the stick on the Warthog base, but there is not more comments on those limitations.

they will not change or improve anything about russians. They leave all so weak on purpose.

Maybe they moved to Poland? IRL they were sold to Poland. Please try look for Mig-29A in GDR. I think the most correct is set this Mig to Poland as Germany hold it few years only.

your disrespectful post about I am not able to understand was reported and seem everything will remain all right with your post. It is not about been able to understand what you want to the whole people understand. It is a debate. If you want the whole community have the same ideas and point of views then we are in the wrong direction here. it is clear. Before Smerch was with 90km range in DCS and the cluster effect was added latter. Was no name on that rocket other than Smerch without classification. Before was a kind of dispersed fragmentation. If they want to improve different warhead that is ok. But take the early DCS 90km and convert it to and old Soviet cluster effect or HE effect with less range than before is not clear. Because is known the longer 90km range is a Russian post Soviet Era version and remove it to invent two different old Soviet versions in favor of who? if we got Su-30 and Su-34 as AI and they are Russian post Soviets production. Why the post Soviet Russian made 90km range was removed instead to make the right HE Fragmentation they added a HE with 70km as a Soviet rocket unique in Russian stock that is false. They have change or new made the majority of their munitions. The same for Bombers bombs and missiles there are some improvements new versions in Russian side. The fact is that the 90km range was changed to the old Soviet made such rockets remain in stock in Ukraine and some others countries with copies.

They should remove Su-30 and Su-34 AI from DCS and then set this action as "correct as it is” then as those fighters are Russian made new versions and they wanted to put everything old to Russia in DCS

No you are wrong. How come you can tell a weapon is overperformed. What is your proof to tell Russian rocket version 9M528 is overperformed? Before Smerch systems were used a 90km rocket version in DCS. now they name two versions with CM (cluster munitions) and the other with HE (high explosive) and suddenly they remove the 90km rocket to put instead old versions with 70km. Those rockets are Ukrainian stock old Soviets versions. How come they want to put Russia in the same level of Ukranian systems? The Russian actually developed an even longer version with 120km range and the Admins here wanted to set old Soviets versions for Russians as "Correct as it is"??

The thread have been marked as correct as it is without have account of 9M528 rocket with 90km range. Only used by Russians units. That’s not fair. As they improved Hawk Sam to an incredible 45km range how dare they downgrade the Russians made improvements. Smerch MLRS used the 90km range before in DCS and now we find that downgrade range to the Soviets made rocket while we are facing Aim-9X and more modernized weapons.

This. There is Binoculars or we can zoom out? Multicrew is on plan for it?

9m528 ROCKET WITH 90Km range is made is Russia. Seem to be a production post Soviet Union so Ukraine probably don't have this longer range rocket

Today I was testing both versions of Smerch. Before we used to have a 90km range fragmentation rockets. Now after the introduction of new HE rockets the old fragmentation version have been downgraded to 70km range. So instead to improve Smerch the new rocket brought less range and removed the 90km longer range rocket fragmentation head. when Hawk SAM was improved with new units and new missiles the new missiles actually have twice range. Now you introduced new rockets for Smerch and we get the contrary. Less range and downgraded capability... There is a reason for that?? Smerch have IRL a rocket that reach 90km and you removed that rocket range. See track Smerch CM rocket unit doesnt want to fire because range was exceded 70km Smerch missile shorter range.trk

Facing F-16 without any external support. New landing area close to Maykob with high difficulty of landing. Here you can learn how evade Aim-120. As you can see in the video the maneuver is side-left down and again side-right down, ECM off when I start maneuvering (to brake secondary track on you). As ECM have a biased delay of almost a minute (that's not real) to be activated, I let it off but the best is ones you get lead on him put ECM ON again. the maneuvers should be always side down because they are learning from redforce players and every single time they change blueforce missiles coding to share results information and keep the ingame superiority in blueforce even when the Red Units are Russians. Mission updated attached. Unit for this particular action is Maykob Area. F-18 group against trainner landing on Road V2.miz

I found that bomb in encyclopedia but I don’t get to find which aircraft carry it… it is WIP? It is anti-tank cluster guided bomb.

I want ask you something. Do you think all you knowledge in IR deserve a single minute of attention. While what I wanted to said before that what really matter is the heat intensity instead of source hemisphere aspect in an air combat. If your daily meal is IR knowledge I say you again be happy with yourself. That’s what really matter.

I think you are mixing new IR image technology with something built in 70s. If it is a giant forest on fire, or a tiny matchstick then is something about how the IRST convert that heat into the HUD. I can’t not compare new IR technology with something made 40 years ago. Probably you are right or maybe not. If that concept from 70s you wanna call it energy and you feel good with that. I am glad for that.

IRST have nothing to do with rear hemisphere. It is all about heat source. Helicopters, missiles, ships if they are hot enough you will have them in IRST.

What is the size for this map?

There is a Su-30 mod on the way. They are doing amazing job in 3D art. Look really promising and I support all free mods around a simulator. If someone don't like it, just don't install it, don't play it and the community itself will judge the job made.

absolutely correct. Iran was a in very bad situation with the old Soviets ECM pods. intelligence unveiled the frustration on Iranian F-14 pilots on this regard. about if the implementation of ECM will be right or not… well it is a matter of make something close to a real life old school radar jamming but never close to the unrealistic current ECM that allow American fighters shoot down Russians Migs and Su like ducks. That’s not acceptable and such situation is creating a climax of Superiority super power against another Nation with extremely success in Air combat in History. That is the simulation they gave us. Fan Boys are in a Carnival Life with Russian in DCS…

Mig-29S can still keep pushing against new modules, just the unreal implementation of ECM is making the Aim-120 much more powerful against Soviet units with ECM like Su-27S and Mig-29S 9.13. They are having fun with Soviets versions such is not real. in the case of Mig-29A 9.12 it is a different level. It is the first version for export and have not ECM and weapons are short to medium range so that is a clear reason to believe will be a hard task to face new modules. A fighter with ECM should not be tracked when using maneuvers and chaff countermeasures. That situation is hard because the new modules will be jammed and Aim-120 will not be so useful. In that case Su-27S and Mig-29S they both have IRST and long range IR missiles to deal with that situation. So that should be fixed and simulate ECM and the jamming radar close to real. What we get now is a 50km range with the option of lock and do all you want and that situation is making Soviets versions been shoot down constantly in multiplayers by the new modules buyers. They are having fun with Mig-29S and Su-27S Russians versions in a unrealistic manner. That situation is creating a huge overpower in the simulator because on top of that they keep updating Aim-120 and Aim-7 together with the no jamming affecting F fighters. 50km range without jamming issue it is a situation in favor of the longer range missiles and it is exactly what they are doing improving the Aim-120 continually.

Look promising

80 aircraft without GCI and with the weapons and sensor to use in a ECM condition but your simulation for Aim-120 it is not real. Aim-120 will not work so easily like you do now in ECM. That’s why Mig-29 have IRST sensor and IR longer range missiles. As this is a direct issue for F fighters, then they take care and remove ECM in 50km. that’s not a simulation because you are facing Russian Mig-29S with ECM and what we got right now is a duck hunting with a Aim-120 been shoot from 100km while you are able to track unrealistically a Mig-29S with ECM from 45km in flanking aspect. So your argument of tell it is balanced only because it is a 80 fighter doesn’t apply for Russian Mig-29S with ECM (no simulated) and without GCI (not implemented) then you are used your super modern fighter in a biased simulator missing real simulation about what really matter for Russians Migs and Su fighters. If you don’t get the issue of ECM in medium short range and Mig and Su missed grouped datalink and GCI you are playing a unrealistic simulation in a biased and unbalanced way

the thread is about Mig-29! there is something else you want to add to misunderstand the word BALANCE in a simulator that should simulate the reality?? it is unbalanced because one side is not receiving the real system while the other side it is receiving more than the real version brought to the table.

the thread is about Mig-29… Seem you are here to only remarking what is wrong or missed in F fighters instead to support the aircraft we are talking about. plus all the information you throw is inaccurate or misleading. if you have flown Mig-29 you will notice it is not right the interception with such a simulation. no mention the level of retard has the Mig-29 AI. They not even know how evade a missile. and the dogfight is like fight against the new cadet of the military school. Now try the same with F AI. I hope you understand now what mean balance in a simulator. Because to do a simulator developers must simulate the real stuff, not giving only candies to one side and porked the other side…

nice picture about Datalink. Ho well… I hope someday they give some love to Migs and Su. They say a military contract to do modules but this is a business between they and military part. of course if there are not proof for the community about those contract for advanced military contract, how come another Air Force will truth on that move. That will be as giving the military information to someone only ask for proof about secret detailed information. While in the same time they bring to the table a OP scenery without giving the fair balance to the opposite side. Like that the rest of official manufactures will not truth so easily or not at all.