Baco

Oh indeed, Only for cliento or Player. After All you can allways late spawn more IA form every airport. It is important for MP missions, or more variety on SP missions.

+100

totaly agree. More Airbase static objects, more inmersion. Also some grond crew for Land bases liek the SC deck crew would be awesome.

well no point in having BOB planes without the Heinkel 111´s and or the Ju 87 at Least as AI....

acctually every NDB beacon on the map has this generic kind of "base"....

Actually, lots Beacons are where an airstrip should be. I belive they have been cut out to reduce the amount of objects?

Another one!

WOW never ever seen them before... I wonder if there are more uncgharted airfields... One more reason to give have every Aircraft in DCS be able to Take off from Ground!

OT . looking at Googlemaps, I wonder how the heck does the US get there... Who gives them overfly permision? Turmenistan? Pakistan? Im prety sure thy dont get in over Iran , do they?

It´s not a matter of size in square miles or Km, , but of desntity of objects, roads, airbases, etc... There is a physical limit to how many objects and data you can place in a map and still be playeable... You migh get the whole of Afghanistan in a map but it would require 128 Gb of Ram to run it making it inpractical to run.. much less sell... or just crahing DCS when you load it...

Like the tittle says. Its only a few lines of code and it would give so much flexibility to mision makers... And Specialy NOT be cosntrained by the parking spaces on bases. Please explain why not, if its not psoible. Thanks in advance!

Well Lots of the Assets can be used in Syria.... all the 80´s tech fo rinstance or are you going to do teh 1982 Lebanon civil war with 2000s ground tech? AND most is very relevan to the Cold War times... so I belive that the Assets is teh strong set of thepackage... Can some one change the title to South atlantic.. Falklands is accurate but rude.

Too big, too densly populated, maybe a 1940/45 era could be done, but even then Too densly populated... and still too big. It´s not about Square kilometers/Miles, its about the density of objects you need to put inside those Kilometers... why do you think nevada is so, so small and has so little detail outside Las Vegas...

Tell you what, I have no use for an Il-16 on DCS yet, but if you do de AN-2 i´ll buy both. Onlly for WWII. But the AN 2 can be used from Korea 1950 all the way to Syria 2020... On nevada as private charter or sight seeing, and a gazillion mopre scnearios.... With a Yak 3 you are going to fight Doras or 109K´s ? Where in Kerch? most of WWII area of the caucasus is low detail...

Its a must have. The only real theater of war for most modules on DCS. Besides its goergeous ;). And I am a slut for maps LOL...

and No I woudl not buy 1 single low fidelity plane for DCS, ever...The only reason I just Boght FC3 is to fly some MODS, and now ED has closed that door too, I realy wish I could retun the Module or exchange it for a Full Fidelity one. Wait for MAC there you will have your super systems matched killfest Multiplayer sesions...

Well maybe the OP, is not asking for a full detailed module, but only to make the current functionality Clickable...

wow Thaaks for the inside Data Skatezilla! Pity tho, both EAW and SP1 and 2 and everthing in between gave me lots of hours of fun and entertainment... SP has a special place in my heart. I know that it was a very relaxed incarnation of a Fligthsim, but the era, the missions, the atmosphere was amazing for the time.

Agree 100%. we need more 70s and 80s, not more XXI century planes... hell, 60´s would be amazing also ;)

Why on earth are the chineese speaking english? Other than that, lovely vid Thanks!!!

Not all of us want to measure our....er measure up on PvP servers.. Some of us want a detailed and accurate simulation of weapons systems to learn and enjoy... And FC 20 would be grate, since it offer so many new scenarios to play out... Specially when the JF is not going to be exported to no one...(realisticly at least).

oh please as an IA Asset! pretty please!!!

the H-5 would be so usefull to so many scenarios and missions.. besides a true bomber, twin engine, old school.. so, so cool!

I stand corrected. yes GMT is UK...

he said "maybe one day", so not even planned or integrated to the work time line, so not untill at least 2025 with some luck... I trully believe that the Eagerly awaited (or as they said, "Anticipated") is the Mi 24 HIND.. There is nothing tangible after that, its Mosie, Hind and then we will see....