AKULA_OPTIMUS

Really, is like there is no one working in this module at the moment... even the mods don´t know what´s going on.

Yea, that bugs me a lot, even more now I´m learning antiship with the Viggen, ships get destroy but they dont sink.

Yes, there is a farp in one of the airport platforms so the helo could land in there, never had thought of that, thank you very much you both

Ramp start, I always do. This is the mission, it worked alright until the patch, maybe is something with the route or I dunno VIGGEN TEST.miz

I don´t understand, it just happens in one particular mission, I made another, same route, same parking spot (at Anapa), same start procedure (autostart in case I´m doing something wrong).... but in one the heading is ok, the other is broken, what can it be

Now theres always a nav system problem, does not matter if you do a manual start or an auto start. You do the 9099 thing, but in the bana/grans position, it doesn´t show the runway heading, just 00 or 18 if you change the rwy heading. Also, the waypoints have that line on them, like the post above shows Ok, I´ve made some test in other airports (caucasus), and the runway numbers are not right, maybe is that

Landing gear is overrated This happened to me after a sam strike, didn´t know if it was better to perform the landing with 2 legs or no gear, did in in 2, I didn´t notice any difference, it was a nominal landing with just some controls issues

Delayed just on the line, bruh!!!!

There´s no way its 2.8 without promoting it first.

Can you share a screenshot? Never heard of that issue before

Whats the point of flying bombers in such small maps like DCS has?

Those 3D models look niiiice

I appreciate the effort, but you guys sometimes talk like reporting a bug will cause miracles or something, there are bugs reported many times, acknowledged, and they are still present after months or even years. The solution is not to report bugs, its fixing them.

Also, youtube is your friend when looking for info on any module, tons of reviews, tutorials and good stuff there.

The thing with SC, is that we don't know if there is a team of 15 people working on it on a daily basis, or one person working 2 hours a week (It's an exaggerated example, but you know what I mean ), both situations are compatible with all the things ED is telling us about the SC development, the only truth is that the development of this module is painfully slow, more than any other. Talking about the point of this thread, the things I expect the most in this year is the F-1 from aerges, the vulkan thing, new weather effects, and of course, bug fixing...

Is not just that feature, its ANY new feature, and of course all the present bugs , there´s even a missing carrier (the Stennis). By some stardards, customers can also say to ED, not to turn this into trolling.

Planned = real work haven´t even started. Forget them until 2023, then. Thanks for the heads up

Surely we will need to wait two years for this to get implemented, but it would be very nice

We already have them

Video was superb, the things showed on it, not that much.

? You can perfectly do that with the Hornet in game, even more now that the ground effect has been fixed

Well, that´s the issue when you are eagerly waiting for something, it feels like it takes forever

You don't fly the Hornet, do you? You know is still in early access? How can that be finished ?

Can´t test until next week... is the Hornet HSI map fixed? Cause I don´t have any hope

Sure, and I would be ok with that if the damage model was realistic, but DCS is completely arcade in that regard, either you hit the vehicle/structure directly, or its like nothing happened.