AKULA_OPTIMUS

There´s no way its 2.8 without promoting it first.

Can you share a screenshot? Never heard of that issue before

Whats the point of flying bombers in such small maps like DCS has?

Those 3D models look niiiice

I appreciate the effort, but you guys sometimes talk like reporting a bug will cause miracles or something, there are bugs reported many times, acknowledged, and they are still present after months or even years. The solution is not to report bugs, its fixing them.

Also, youtube is your friend when looking for info on any module, tons of reviews, tutorials and good stuff there.

The thing with SC, is that we don't know if there is a team of 15 people working on it on a daily basis, or one person working 2 hours a week (It's an exaggerated example, but you know what I mean ), both situations are compatible with all the things ED is telling us about the SC development, the only truth is that the development of this module is painfully slow, more than any other. Talking about the point of this thread, the things I expect the most in this year is the F-1 from aerges, the vulkan thing, new weather effects, and of course, bug fixing...

Is not just that feature, its ANY new feature, and of course all the present bugs , there´s even a missing carrier (the Stennis). By some stardards, customers can also say to ED, not to turn this into trolling.

Planned = real work haven´t even started. Forget them until 2023, then. Thanks for the heads up

Surely we will need to wait two years for this to get implemented, but it would be very nice

We already have them

Video was superb, the things showed on it, not that much.

? You can perfectly do that with the Hornet in game, even more now that the ground effect has been fixed

Well, that´s the issue when you are eagerly waiting for something, it feels like it takes forever

You don't fly the Hornet, do you? You know is still in early access? How can that be finished ?

Can´t test until next week... is the Hornet HSI map fixed? Cause I don´t have any hope

Sure, and I would be ok with that if the damage model was realistic, but DCS is completely arcade in that regard, either you hit the vehicle/structure directly, or its like nothing happened.

I just did some test, CCIP is really a lottery, sometimes you hit bullseye, sometimes you miss by 10 meters, and I´m talking about releasing them at constant speeds and stable flight, no crazy manoeuvres, AUTO is overall more reliable but also limited. With fragmentation bombs... it doesn´t matter how you launch them, they are bugged and they hit wherever they want, and its been like that for more than a year at least

Happened to me many times on long flights, switching TACAN ON and OFF fix the problem.

They don´t even know. I believe that´s the most sincere answer you can get.

You can also designate targets through the HUD.

Ohh thank you for this, I always used the initials of the carrier to name the TACAN, now I´ll do it properly

Which aircraft? In the Hornet seems alright

That´s your anwser? Im here because I´m a user, can you answer my question without childish response?

I think they don´t even know themselves, they are just deciding as they go depending on the tech implemented in the core game, and the bugs and problems they encounter in development.