gavagai

The mission complete % is kind of mysterious to me. I follow all of the instructions to a T and still do not receive 100%, sometimes much less.

Terrible? No, it is just ugly. The lowest I can tolerate is 1440.

Great scott! I don't have anything nice to say here...

AI doesn't count. Against the current M2K I'm confident I could outfly a good pilot with the Fishbed.

Of course it is a bug. If you tell the unit to drive on the road that is what it should do. In DCS 1.5 units drive on the roads very well.

Fortunately, Razbam disagrees with you.:music_whistling:

But this was 1991. If it had been just a few years later the F-18 would have fired 6 spamraams at the Mig-25 and it would have been all good.:music_whistling:

I'm not saying it is correct (I agree it is very suspicious). But I know CptSmiley will get to it. Razbam has done a really good job with the M2K module and their communication with customers is #1.

I thought we already heard from Cpt Smiley that the high AoA drag of the M2K could be too high... https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3113489#post3113489 The flight model is WIP and it is going to change again, and again... People have a tendency to assume that the most recent iteration is correct and final, but a quick look at the recent past indicates that to be a naive assumption.

2.1 does not in my experience. I have 16gb but I only see 2.1 using half of that.

Everyone knows the Germans make good stuff.

NTTR has pretty good performance in 2.1. Normandy is still pretty rough, so I wouldn't use NTTR performance for discussions of 2.1 Normandy performance. Adjusting settings may help some, but it is no substitute for a fix from ED. 2.1 performance is definitely worse than 2.0.5, even in the NTTR map.

At 1920x1080 he should be able to, yes. I will give these Nvidia CP settings a try and see if they help in 2560x1440 and 3840x2160. Don't be confused. It is ED that can bring us back to 2.0.5 performance, and very unlikely that anyone can do it by merely adjusting his settings. The psychological phenomenon of confirmation bias is ever present in these discussions.

I use the music from that video for my Spitfire DCS theme.:)

I barely noticed the difference. The one difference I could observe was in loading multiplayer maps. The more complicated maps would seem to hang forever on loading with 8gb.

Thanks. Gave it a try. No difference here, but I never had any issues with deferred shading. Just hoping to get 2.05 performance back with trees and buildings.

Yeah, I just gave up on the mission I was working on. When I put in the exact same scripts and triggers with a new mission it worked fine. Something was corrupted in the .miz file.

Recommended GPU from the Normandy store page:

With the 109 you can basically open the throttle all the way and not even think about it... I'm a little incredulous that the Merlin was so much easier to overheat and damage.

People with the 1080ti are reporting problems with Normandy. So don't even bother upgrading right now; save your money for next year, or whatever.:doh:

Thanks! I still can't figure out what's wrong with my mission though. I've used this script dozens of times and this time it's not working! Yours works fine.

Please share a mission with a working flak script. I still can't get it to work with Normandy. I figure I may as well play with the ME while I wait for fixes.

I would love a set of force-feedback rudder pedals. Do they exist? I love my msffb2.

Not for me. With the newer version of MIST the flak script doesn't work in 2.1.

Yup. And it's also present in the Bf 109 now, too.