iFoxRomeo

Versuch mal den Rahmen des Monokulars in "Special" zu deaktivieren. Das hat bei mir etwas Besserung gebracht. Habe auch Cockpit texturen auf medium gesetzt. Is wohl doch weniger n CPU problem. fpsVR zeigt ganz klar, dass der GPU Anteil Probleme bereitet Das mit dem Cursor ist mir auch negativ aufgefallen. Aber da ich die Maus nutze, schiebe ich den Cursor nach der Nutzung ausm Bild raus (EDIT: bringt auch nix). Hab 3-4 Flüge gemacht. So richtig umgehauen hat mich das Gesamtpaket noch nicht...

Also bei mir ist die Performance im Apache auch grottenschlecht. Keines der neuernen Module performt so unterirdisch. Es scheint aber n Problem mit der CPU Last zu sein. Im SteamVR performance graph ist nicht die Frametime der GraKa das Problem, sondern die der CPU. Muss mal FPSVR rauskramen. Hind, Mossie, F-16, F-18, alles(mehr oder weniger) tutti bene. Apache, merdé. Hab nur einen kurzen Flug gemacht. Der Apache brauch mehr Zeit im Backofen.

Also um es klar zu stellen. Es ist ein Tarnkappenbomber... https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/amp/luftwaffe-wird-tarnkappenbomber-f-35-erhalten-100.html

60% der Auflösung der Brille, oder SteamVR Einstellung?

The current Apache and Hind, actually all helicopters, rotors look very outdated. They look like youtube-video rotors with variable framerate. Not realistic at all. ED you did a really incredible good job with the propellers of the Warbirds. Please uprate the helicopter rotors in a similar way. The current rotor visuals are just not on par with the rest of the cockpit and external models. Even a simply inflated propeller animation attached to the rotorhead would look better than what we have now. Fox

@BIGNEWYI am honestly surpised that this topic came up... but glad that there appears some kind of movement in the topic of the Korean Birds. I only made shots with the gunsight in radar mode. Aaaand I took the liberty to modify your mission and put in the opponent the Sabre fought against primarily. Two tracks, two short videos in SLOWMO, two tacviews, two pics. Su-27 86_su27.trkTacview-20220228-194719-DCS-86_7.trk.zip.acmi MiG-15bis 86_mig15.mizTacview-20220228-231747-DCS-86_MiG15_3.trk.zip.acmi The Bullets fall always short. Some significant lead is required WITH the gunsight to hit the target. I aim at the fuselage, miss. I aim at the cockpit, miss. Only at very close distances you can hit the aircraft's tail-section when you aim for the cockpit. In the case of the MiG-15 even ahead of the cockpit to hit the aircraft. My bet is that, if the bullets get their speed adjusted to the correct value, then the gunsight would work as supposed. But since ED decided to encrypt the luas, I can't check that hypothesis by myself. Bignewy, perhaps you could get a modified LUA with the correct V0 for the bullets and post it here to have us try it with that setting?! Fox

Wer braucht schon Panavia, wenn... Es wird gemunkelt, dass PC auch mit den Horten Brüdern bzgl. der 229 verhandeln. Oder dass sie n FM für Hubschrauber entwickeln...

The last official statement from ED about the Me262 is "...not in the works..." (Dez 2020) Shirts etc only for backers who pledged 180$+ You should contact ED's support about this if you are a platinum backer.

Phil, Dietrich et al. Thank you! S!

Now the term "Flying Circus" has got a new meaning for me. Well... some pilots did use binoculars in flight. Why would Phil need your respect?

Thanks for the summary. People show often antipathy to the Kickstarter project, but forget, that there would probably only be the Mustang and Dora in the shop without the failed KS. It kickstarted the whole DCS WWII project. Just a little correction. The Fw190D-9 is an original ED module. It was not part of the KS project. And it would have ended probably the same way as the MiG-15 and F-86, no map, no assets. And a little addition. The KS planned P-47 was a D-28

No sweat. It was not my offense-meter that got triggered. There is more effort necessary till I let someone offend me. Yeah, cat videos rock! Mate, look, if you want problematic behaviour -that you see in this 109- adressed, explain it. Not everyone has the ... ... to see it.

Finally111 someone sees me the way I am Well, it is common that aircraft spiral into the ground and explode in multiplayer servers. But what is the misbehaviour? What did he do that made you so angry?

Nobody disappeared in your video! And just using ESC doesn't do anything. The server must register that he left to remove the aircraft from the game. But the 109 kissed the ground fatally so he was killed before he left the server. Or was this explosion at the end not visible during live gameplay on the server? If he had just vanished mid-air, yeah that would be super lame. No question about it. Are you sure you didn't kill the pilot/fatally injure him? Are you aware that due to network-lag it is possible that on your pc no bullets hit your opponent, but on his end he was dead/severely injured or damaged? I had this on a dogfight server just recently(and it happens the other way around also). Did you check the log after the track replay? There you can see hits and kills. Tacview? Do yourself a favor and re-play this dive in a 109. The 109 kills you quickly if you don't know what you are doing in a high speed dive at low altitude. You came out of the dive at 400mph-644km/h in the P-51. Good luck pulling out in a 109 at this altitude and this speed and nose down attitude. At 1:56 your g-meter shows a maximum of +2.1g. After the pull out at 2:42 your g-meter maximum is just below 7g. 7g in the 109 at 644km/h is not easy for someone who doesn't know how to handle it. (And no, it wasn't me in your video)

The Anton will never get any increased boost. And ED will not take position on this. The request for 100/150 octane fuel came up soon after the P-51 release in 2012, but even in 2021, ED released the Mossie as a pure 100/130 octane version. That tells a bit about the topic of increased engine power. sidenote to c3-injection

No sweat. Es ist ja auch ziemlich viel los mittlerweile. Meintest du vielleicht die Bearcat Mod? Genau. Darüber hinaus, der folgende Text ist von der Belsimtek FB Seite. 01.06.2018 "...We are confident that the future will hold big surprises, notably with The F-16C Block 50, Mi-24P, AH-1S Huey Cobra and F-4E Phantom II in the development pipeline, which are sure to make DCS World grow even more...." https://de-de.facebook.com/belsimtek/ Die F-4 ist zwar dann später on-hold gegangen, aber es scheint jetzt weiter zu gehen.

Die La-7 scheint mehr als nur n Gerücht zu sein. Plexus hat das in seinem letzten update geposted. Das offizielle Announcement der La-7 soll bald erfolgen. Na du erinnerst dich doch sicherlich an das P-40 desaster bei VEAO?! Glücklicherweise hatte ich da nicht vorbestellt...

Remove all bindings to auto-shutdown on keyboard, joystick etc. and look if it happens again. If it happens again attach the track, as Flappie suggested.

With Napalm you can take out Tanks without hitting them directly. Would be helpful for the Korean Era as well.

Did you see the 24.12. post from Mr Octopus? Especially the last picture?

I'm afraid you are right. ED hides behind the research curtain. That way they can push the 262 the next 8 years along. I'd love to be proven wrong though.

I know mate. It just gets so incredible frustrating to have a bug reported (a) year(s) ago, then have it finally acknowledged some 6-12 months ago, thread closed.... and nothing happens. That is just bad customer appreciation.

Could you please ask the moderators to not close bug reports, once they are reported?(and reopen the closed ones). Unfortunately since a year(or so) bug reports get closed, so a bump is not possible. Thank you for your effort.