iFoxRomeo

Mit nem Ryzen Prozessor sollte man auch noch n Moment warten, falls man jedes Frame benötigt. https://www.golem.de/news/microsoft-windows-11-macht-amds-ryzen-langamer-2110-160162.html

Did you suffer an engine failure due to overcooling in the Spitfire?

That should help

With 23.9lb/sq.in. We only have 18lb/sq.in With 18 lb HX809 reached 332mph

No, the outer tanks only feed "their" engine. No crossfeed for the outer tanks, that's why you should burn that fuel first.

Yes, it does.

A workaround till bugfix: After setup of the bomb panel, wingbombs seletion and fuse, you can drop the wing bombs with the droptank jettison button (don't forget to open the cover for this button). Then they will drop and explode.

Gar nicht. Ist noch nicht fertig.

It would be realistic to use two buttons. In the real mossie you shoot the 20mm with the index finger and the .303 with the thumb. Don't forget to open the window and order the ground crew to prime the engines again after a failed start attempt. Fox

No 25lbs boost. It's a copy/paste mistake. The manual is also in early access.

Affirm. They don't work. The engine(s) cough but continue to work when the cutoff is pulled. I put the feathering button on the Warthog Throttle idle/cutoff switches. That way I can access them quickly if necessary and am sure to reduce throttle to zero before activating the mechanism. But the throttles have to be put back to idle after activation so that the buttons are not pushed permanently, as it would unfeather the props again. Interestingly I have NO problems feathering the props in MP and SP... Will re-check it later. Fox

The radiator flaps warp with open command and unwarp with close command. It appears that one side of the flap is fixed, hence the warping with open/close.

Wow, you're so nice. Thanks. But I wouldn't take this as a reference. Engine is idling and it looks like a jumpy instrument. The sound of the engine doesn't change while the needle jumps. This kind of movement doesn't look like vibration induced oscillation. I'm looking for cockpit videos and once I find something i'll post it. Fox

Please post a video, where the oscillation that the DCS Mossie shows, is visible on a real warbird. The videos I checked didn't show this kind of behaviour.

The A8's ATA curve:

Interesting. So I tried it with mags on. Throttle back, rpm back, feather button pressed and the engine stops. Then mags off. After a while mags on and feathering button pressed till at least 400 rpm and the engine is back on. Works with port and starboard engine. I didn't switch off the fuel for comfort reasons, VR. Fox

@NineLineSorry, but this doesn't look like vibrations. Granted I never flew a Mossie irl, but I know some vibrating instruments in aircraft. In the DCS Mossie the RPM indicators act more like an airspeed-indicator in gusty winds. Moves up, dances around, goes down, dances around, moves up dances around, etc.... an instrument that swings because of vibration, swings nearly equidistant forth and back from a center-point. And cockpit videos of mossies don't show such a behaviour, but they are hard to use as evidence.

I'd like to pull the circuit breaker for this annoying horn, but where is it.... At sealevel standatd wx the throttles give 7 inches just above the horn threshold. No way to decelerate this way. Looking at the video I posted, it seems "working as intended", but I hope not.

Works fine for me. You have to push and hold the button for a few seconds. And switch off the magnetos before you feather the prop, as the engine is still running. The procedure in the flight manual-emergencies describes the feathering once the engine failed, so you need to shut it down for simulated failure. You don't feather a working engine, do you? Fox

They probably told the maintenace to rip this thing out of the aircraft. Here is a "nice" demo.

I'm not selling DCS modules and I'm not paid by ED, so why should I do this job? Till now I haven't heard ED ask the community for help in gathering information about the 262 despite searching for 7 years. Well, actually I'll try to get in contact with the Messerschmitt-Stiftung, but it is still closed to the public. And the German airforce museum is also on my to-do list. And actually I am gathering data about the 262. It's not a lot, but if ED asks for information I'd be willing to share what I have found so far, if they say what they need. I'm perfectly aware that missing data is to be expected. I made a post about it in the 262 thread. So you know the truth...? I will wind my neck out as long as I like. You don't like other people to suggest you to play other games, so perhaps you should then refrain from showing similar behaviour?! So only those who made a DCS module can have a material judgement? Look, in case you have not heard a interview with Nineline, where he tells about a situation with Nick. "NL: What about the 262?" "Nick: I really like the Hellcat!". Since Igor unfortunately died in 2018, Nick got more involved and changed some priorities. It's the same Nick who also said that they "...had to do some german stuff and whatnot..." after adoring the Spitfire and Mustang for minutes and minutes. Ask Dietrich. Even Nineline had to revert his statements about the 262 that "it is coming", when Kate said in Q4/2020 that the 262 is "not in the works". They managed to get data for the F/A-18, F-16 and AH-64 but the 262, which was even privately rebuilt in the early 2000years (5 aircraft iirc) and given serial numbers by the Messerschmitt foundation, is such a tough nut? Really? Everything put together tells me that they, and especially Nick, don't want the 262. I can be wrong of course. I hope I am wrong, but it doesn't seem so(for me). And considering this, how is the PTO even an option for ED, when there is next to zero information available for the Zero and co. Hellcats vs. Corsairs then? People tend to confuse this. The P-51 and especially the D9 are original ED projects and not from the KS. I'm sure that, if the KS campaign hadn't happened, then the DCS WWII section would probably look very differently to what it is now. I think of the Korean birds. They made two contemporary aircraft Sabre vs. MiG --> P-51 vs Fw190D9 and next to zero period correct ai assets for them. The KS campaign somewhat forced ED to commit more to the WWII theatre than they actually planned at that time. Why else would they let someone else do the WWII aircraft(back in 2013)?

Just to make it clear: P-51D-25 and Fw190D-9 are original ED projects. Both are not from the KS project. Researching for 7+ years for a certainly unclassified module is...yeah...interesting. Meanwhile ...F/A-18C, F-16C, AH-64D...

No, he doesn't want to show them in the ME, he wants the "hide on map" checkbox unchecked. I'm afraid there is no possibility to unhide all at once. But if you open the unit list, you can sort the units "Status". There you see "HIDDEN". Doubleclick on the word and you can toggle the "HIDDEN" status of the unit. That way you can "quickly" toggle the status of all units. Fox