Jump to content

Hook47

Members
  • Posts

    1250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Hook47

  1. As mentioned by the post above, the issue isn't a team member having personal issues he can't help, it's taking action to head of Aviodev customers being left in the dark which has happened a few times unfortunately, which I think has led to some of the negativity and tension in these parts.
  2. Understood, and using that I can get them on the wing, but the aircraft thinks they are fuel tanks and wont enter CCRP mode to drop them. I was just wondering if you knew of a way to enable them to function like the Mk. 82s on single or twin ejectors
  3. Sure. Once I'm home I'll edit this post to display it. Thing is I know I must be missing something. I put the weapons on the pylons in Coremods/aircraft/m2000c/M2000C.lau, so it becomes selectable in armament menu, but the aircraft thinks it is a fuel tank. Here is what that code looking like (Pylon 2 used as an example) pylon(2, 0, -1.809, -0.556, 2.333, {use_full_connector_position=true, connector = "str_pnt_002", arg = 309, arg_value = 0}, { {CLSID = "{FD21B13E-57F3-4C2A-9F78-C522D0B5BCE1}", arg_value = 0.15 }, -- Super 530D {CLSID = "{Matra_S530D}", arg_value = 0.15 }, -- Super 530D {CLSID = "{Matra155RocketPod}", arg_value = 0.25 }, -- Matra Type 155 Rocket pod {CLSID = "{BCE4E030-38E9-423E-98ED-24BE3DA87C32}", arg_value = 0.35 }, -- MK-82 {CLSID = "{Mk82SNAKEYE}", arg_value = 0.35 }, -- MK-82 Snakeye {CLSID = "{ADD3FAE1-EBF6-4EF9-8EFC-B36B5DDF1E6B}", arg_value = 0.35 }, -- MK-20 Rockeye (Beluga stand-in must change) {CLSID = "{M2KC_RAFAUT_MK82}", arg_value = 0.35 }, -- MK-82 x2 {CLSID = "{M2KC_RAFAUT_MK82S}", arg_value = 0.35 }, -- MK-82S x2 {CLSID = "{MER*6_MK_82}", arg_value = 0.35 }, -- MER 6 Mk 82 Sense the aircraft still thinks it is a fuel tank, I tried declaring a new loud out under Coremods/aircraft/m2000c/weapons/M2kC_Weapons.lau but I have a feeling this is where I am messing up, partly because I don't know exactly what to put, particularly under elements. Maybe I am going about this all wrong but I am learning!. Here is that code: declare_loadout({ -- Testing category = CAT_BOMBS, CLSID = "{MER*6_MK_82}", attribute = {wsType_Weapon, wsType_Bomb, wsType_Container, WSTYPE_PLACEHOLDER}, wsTypeOfWeapon = {4, 5, 9, 31}, Count = 6, --count of wepon Cx_pil = 0.002, -- drag index of whole rack Picture = "mk82.png", displayName = _("{MER*6_MK_82}"), Weight = 100 + 2 * 232,-- weight adapter + weapon Elements = })
  4. Speaking of the ground radar, I wonder if that is the primary blocking issue that pushed the Viggen so far back from its estimated announcement/release date. The way LNS moves I have a hard time envisioning the work that was estimated to be 95 percent complete months ago still holding it back. I am really stoked to get an announcement before long, but I hope the Gazelle will show up and tide me over
  5. With all due respect to Aviodev, I just can't understand why complications like this can't be taken into consideration before announcing a deadline for a release to the community. I'm afraid that is just causing more drama in the end, regardless of whether or not it's justified
  6. Thanks for the ongoing support to this mod! CA drivable is always a plus but understand if it is not in your original scope. Either way we appreciate you and Falcon fixing it quickly
  7. Things still moving along, or have you guys hit any walls?
  8. Skatezilla, Bear with me as I am new, but I am trying to enable some non included weapons on the Mirage 2000C and having trouble getting the aircraft to recognize them. I am trying to get the MER 6 Mk 82 mounted and working, I have it mounted, but the M-2000C thinks its a fuel tank. Is something to the effect of what you have mentioned here how I would need to make it work on the aircraft in the proper mode? the CLSID is "{MER*6_MK_82}"
  9. Hold down the pyro button for a moment or two, and see if that works
  10. The next few days has come and past. . . Any update whatsoever on a WIP video or something?
  11. The Eagle is a great plane, and I enjoy them both, but having a large amount of time in both, I feel like it is my game to loose when I fight an Eagle in the flanker. The superior handling, HMD and armament advantages are substantial. The only thing I have to worry about is surviving a bunch of SPAMRAMS on the way to the merge
  12. Gazelle as an anti tank bird my be overreaching a bit. It will be suited as a light attack aircraft against light armor and scout vehicles, and of course soft targets for sure. Anti tank remains firmly the territory of the KA-50 I think
  13. Tough choice. Both are excellent but for the money I think you get a little more with the L-39C/ZA
  14. I'm really hoping that will be how it is
  15. I would like to attend if work permits, is there a limit?
  16. We are waiting, although I must admit I am still baffled by how such a tremendous underestimation on announcement timeline could occur! :music_whistling:
  17. I dunno, I think there may have been a slight slip in performance on the latest build of 2.0.1 Update 1. I have a powerful PC (i7 4790K with 980ti) and I am noticing lower frames and even a stutter here and there, but I can't say the same about 1.5.3
  18. Hey guys Just threw this together for use with friends and thought I would put it here for others to enjoy This mod adds NVG capability to the following aircraft: M-2000C L-39ZA- Has the NATO green NVG effect! SU-25T SU-25 It is packaged for mod man but can be installed by simply following the instructions in this video. [ame] [/ame] Note that I have only tested this in 2.0.1 Update 1, but it may work with 1.5.3 as well ***All credit goes to Frenchy's NVG mod for the original effects! I have included it in this mod under the /Bazaar file folder since I don't recommend using NVG without it*** NVG Mod.zip
  19. Excellent news! I have a coop mission planned with some friends that hangs in the balance! Looking forward to the fix!
  20. Same. Wish ED would make these default, with Rangers permission
  21. Good to hear! Looking forward to it immensely. Is this planned to have some switch by switch level of functionality, or is this more FC3 style? I've often thought it would be pretty cool by me and quite attainable for some community modders to add a FC3 level high quality plane to the game. The F-16 is an example of an aircraft that would be a perfect fit
  22. So as I understand it, the man issue is pathing and folder restructuring, correct? I ask because k was planning on cracking open the broken mods and trying to learn from what was broken
  23. Wasn't a third party dev shot down from making an A-4 by the manufacture? Won't this pose issues for this project? Good luck in any case
  24. Additionally, I am so interested in the story of this gentleman, I am trying to reach out to him and let him know that in my own trifling way I am attempting to pay homage to his experience. Perhaps he would be kind enough to give his take on it when it's done! Maybe he even flies DCS-L-39, or will if someone tells him about it :)
  25. Hey guys, with the recent release of the L-39ZA, I was inspired by this incredible tales to build a challenging single player, possibly adversarial MP option mission based on this scenario: http://www.knoxnews.com/news/venable-freedom-flight-ep-413321976-360347061.html?d=mobile I plan on putting some work into this mission and testing my building ability, so I want to make a good production out of it. I was hoping to get a Romanian speaking forum member to record a couple lines of dialogue for me if it wouldn't be too much trouble. Just PM me or reply here if interested! Also if there are any particularly skilled mission builders who would like to collaborate on this with me, I can share the mission on a drop box and we can make a team effort out of it. I think it would be a pretty awesome scenario for a mission! *Note- aside from my own personal opinion, I recognize there may be individuals who do not agree with actions of the man in this story for various reasons. This isn't meant to express a political opinion, just to tell a story much in the sense a movie would. Obviously I approve of his actions given the circumstance, but that is merely my opinion and I have no intention of creating a debate. Additionally, I realize some may see it from the opposite perspective!*
×
×
  • Create New...