Jump to content

Rudel_chw

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    16506

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Rudel_chw

  1. Rudel_chw
    Agree, the problem at the moment is that both the MHR and the LNCH lights always illuminate simultaneously, while the Lock tone can be heard much earlier ... perhaps the bug fix would be to just make the MHR light and the sound tone to occur simultaneously
  2. Rudel_chw
    Hi, Just saw the video and indeed it seems it was like this since the beginning. However, what generates a doubt on my case, is that the official manual states that the sound is heard when there is a radar lock, not before: I can understand that the developers are focused on releasing the Corsair, so I don't expect any Updates or Improvements on the MiG-21 until after that release occurs, however I do expect bug fixing to continue, or at the very least an acknowledgement so that users don't get frustrated. It would be great to have someone from Magnitude comment on this, but at this point I no longer expect it to happen. I truly love this Module, but this kind of problems take a lot of enjoyment out of it, so much so, that I'm on the verge of moving on and take another Module instead for study Best regards and thanks a lot for the help. Eduardo
  3. Rudel_chw
    seems reasonable, thanks a lot for your input
  4. Rudel_chw
    Hi, I'm on the "immersion" camp, so I doubt that any Dynamic Campaign will be attractive to me .. I'd rather spend the 10-15 dollars that a immersive Campaign by @Reflected, @baltic_dragon, @SorelRo and others, costs. But for sure I will try it first to see if I'm wrong about it.
  5. Rudel_chw
    No one can confirm if this is a bug or not? Here is a video where you can hear the tone: This is not an IR missile tone, as the aircraft is mounting no IR missiles, only the R-3R SARH
  6. Rudel_chw
    Great Mod, this is ED's default: and this is Sabot's Thanks again for sharing it
  7. Rudel_chw
    Looks fantastic, thanks a lot for sharing it. i’m not at my pc at the moment, but will download it tomorrow Cheers!
  8. Rudel_chw
    the lack of armament?
  9. Rudel_chw
    Truly looking forward to this Mod, its looking pretty great
  10. Rudel_chw
    I understand that this sounds is heard when a radar locked target is detected by the R-3R missile, but I get the sound when the target is still around 10 Km away and the LNCH light on the ASP Optical Sight is not yet illuminated, and on the radar screen the LNCH light is also not illuminated. Is this normal behaviour? My belief was that the lock-on sound ahould be heard only once the Launch Authorization is attained. Will record a video to illustrate this better.
  11. Rudel_chw
    wait for the spring sale, around March 13th, just in case it is discounted
  12. Rudel_chw
    Hi, thanks a lot for confirming that it isnt just me ... I added the [Bug] tag as it truly seems like a bug now. now, if I could only think of a workaround ... perhaps using Mist or Moose?
  13. Rudel_chw
    Not strictly military, but hey, I thought it was a fun video:
  14. Rudel_chw
    Not sure I understand what you mean .. I use the EDIT - LOAD STATIC TEMPLATE menu command of the ME, I don't have Afghanistan yet (waiting for resolution of ED-RB conflict before purchasing), but on Sinai I get this:
  15. Rudel_chw
    Hello all, I'm editing a training mission about radar employment, and I have noticed that the radar "sees" the radar contacts before I actually activate them. On this image, I've just turned on the radar and it already shows contacts ... the funny thing is that the contacts do not exist yet, as I have not reached the mission point where I will activate the corresponding aircraft: Here is how the intended contacts are defined: And these is the trigger where I activate them, after I've done the radar self-test: Does anyone knows of a work-around for this bug that I could use? I wan't to keep the contacts out until I'm ready to introduce them into the training. Thanks a lot for any help with this, Eduardo
  16. Rudel_chw
    I support the wish, but your above affirmation is simply not true: Feb/2025: 2 updates Jan/25: 1 update Dec/24: 3 updates Nov/24: 2 Oct: 3 Sep: 1 etc Sorry to nitpick, but inventing facts to support our wishes rubs me the wrong way.
  17. Rudel_chw
    Agree, sorry I forgot it .. also on this list should be the I-16. My guess is that the upcoming La-7 and F-4U will sell well and are pretty well-known, so they do not belong to this Module category. Cheers!
  18. Rudel_chw
    My guess is that this is the true reason. Developing a new DCS module represents a big investment and you need to be certain that your sales will at the very least cover that investment. There are exceptions that explain the existence of less famous aircraft on DCS, for example the C-101 was the result of the love that its spanish developers have for it, same for the JF-17 and even the current Viggen is the result of the love a swedish group had for it, they developed it without much regard for if it would be profitable or not.
  19. Rudel_chw
    I wonder the same, as some posts look like teenager stuff
  20. Rudel_chw
    BASE_SENSOR_PROPELLER_PITCH is the name of the Parameter, "0" is the value it had at the moment I recorded it. When I'm using a Parameter, I usually have to do a lot of trials and testing, whenever I discover the full meaning of one, I take note of it on my own documents so I'm able to re-use it on the future ... but there is a lot of trial-error in the process. I employ the LUA Console component of DCS-BIOS, which is a software used mainly by people who build physical cockpits for DCS, as this allows me to check parameters values during different phases of flight. This is an old software, but it still works for me, here is more info:
  21. Rudel_chw
    This is the list I have on this, the values correspond to an in-flight status Spitfire Parameters.txt
  22. Rudel_chw
    None that I know of, multiplayer mission making is much more difficult than a making a single player one, while at the same time the buying public for such a mission is smaller, so it would be a wrong business decision to develop a MP campaign instead of an SP one. If you wan't to fly MP, go into a Server and meet with your pilot there, you could then have as much fun as a SP campaign can offer.
  23. Rudel_chw
    Then the best option is to replace your drive with a bigger one, even if you get to split your terrains on individual drives, it will be just a short term solution as your storage needs clearly are not being met by your current drives.
  24. Rudel_chw
    it's on windows command prompt, if you are not comfortable with this kind of operations please get help from a more experienced friend, as bad linking can impair your DCS
  25. Rudel_chw
    hello, thank you all for sharing your thoughts on this
×
×
  • Create New...