159th_Viper

Only after they have caught up including the entire range of fighters and bombers in the Russian inventory as befits the current Map :D

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=91440

Welcome :)

Aaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnndddd??? You purchase a spare serial - can never have too many spares :D

Direct trajectory launch of a Hellfire gives it a 7km range. High trajectory is a 8km range, this from Helo's. The only way a Hellfire outranges the 9M120M is fired from a UAV (11km).

Not a mistake: Rather a missed opportunity. I would have happily paid for it. Then again, investing in the fidelity of the free base product can only pay dividends in the long run so one can understand the intention behind the decision. Say thank-you for the new pit by buying another module :)

Might just be better for the Mods to prefix the thread title with [sOLVED - NO BUG.]

You'd better not be referring to me with this silly statement. What's with the personal attacks in any event? Got nothing good to say? @LS: Looking forward to the vid :)

Kickstarter backers got all their rewards, yes? Not entitled to any shares as a result of the buy-out, surely.

Incorrect. Apologies for not discussing the legalities with you but there exists a very real cause-of-action, fortuitously enough through Leatherneck's own admission, amongst others. So don't labour under the misapprehension that things are being done 'out of the goodness of their hearts'. Rather out of necessity I would say. Don't attempt to portray Beczl as the bad guy here: Not the time nor the place.

Crimea is still there and always has been. Just needs to be repopulated.

In this specific instance it is - read what I said above.Gawddamn I'm done with this merry-go-round :megalol:

And that right there is the problem: Don't go throwing the kitchen-sink at a problem in an attempt to cloud the issue with irrelevant white-noise. The OP specifically referred to the SFM SU-33's trim characteristics and I replied thereto. 'Overall' has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Trim has been buggy in the SFM planes for years and years and until it's rectified it's best not to rely on it for minute corrections, unless of course you resort to the hack you are referring to. Then again, that's not trim is it, justifying my advice as to not rely on trim in the first instance in that specific scenario ;)

Excellent advice there pertaining to FC3 KNOWING that trim is currently 'buggy'/not working satisfactorily :thumbup: :doh:

Working fine here with 8.1

Don't worry about a new track now that the issue is sorted out - track will not show anything untoward :)

ME = Mission Editor T-Toad = SU-25T

That's the Corsica and Fort Rucker (?) maps made for the exclusive use of third-parties. Definitely not Nevada and no, you'll definitely not be allowed/be able to fly on those maps - not for DCS.

Post a track with a new mission via the ME flying a T-Toad, Runway start. No weather/wind or other - just straight up default.

Why do you fiddle with the registry after every uninstall/install?

Never has been.

Check your flight-stick calibration In-SIM. This is how it should look: I had exactly the same issue. In my instance my wee red 'box' was off-set a half-millimetre or so which resulted in the roll you describe. I calibrated in Windows and the issue sorted itself out as evidenced by the above screenshot.

It seems as if the forums are a 'no-go' area so posting any questions here in the hope of getting them answered is not advisable.

Aye, that's the bug/weakness: As long as he is tracking you he forgets about the incoming Mav. That's why intelligent mission-design will have two of the suckers there :D