Ultra

Those videos are pure awesome!! :shocking:

Wow, the Nevada map looks crazy! Even the Black Sea map looks so much better, more lush and 3D. :thumbup::thumbup:

Hey again guys, I'd just like to make a suggestion based on my recent playing. I would prefer if you guys removed all AI 109's from your servers for now. I see the 109 as an unfinished product especially when it comes to the AI flight model and damage model. This is exacerbated by the fact that currently the AI planes tend to bend the rules of physics and ability to maneuver in certain situations. They're by no means invincible, (and I killed one in a 3-vs-me scenario on your server today and lived :)), but I feel it leads to some very frustrating gameplay. I think it would be better if it were added back in once it is patched and finished. Thanks again for the great server. :thumbup:

Good kill! Very cool. :thumbup:

Pretty slick!

Well, we're already going to have 2 mirages. Maybe they should spread it around a little. ;):D

:doh: He just said a few hours ago: I'm assuming they'll tell us what at least one of the other aircraft is.

:D

Yes! Yes! Finally something semi solid in a while. Thank you Cobra, everyone's been getting antsy about this and DCS 2.0. This should quiet people down a little. :D

Ok good. That's reassuring. :thumbup:

I hope they still have people working on the 109 Beta while they are trying to finish 2.0

This is not an update thread.

Lol that's a good one :D

Apparently even announcements of modules are subject to delays. :D Don't mind me, I'm just being a PITA. ;)

I experience prop gov failure in the P-51 VERY frequently when taking fire. I don't know if this is correct or incorrect though.

It's all just right over the horizon! I think once this project is out and full fledged everyone is going to be really satisfied with it. :)

I think this thread has accomplished its objectives. It has shown to the devs the weight of concern placed on proper spotting by the community. So even though there's plenty of arguing, good job everybody, ;) you made a ruckus :D Thanks for starting the poll skendzie.

Yeah I have to do some more deep thinking about it before I'm dead set on pursuing it, It's nice I still have some time. Thanks for the link.

My curve for rudder is around 30, but it could probably use more tweaking, I'm not entirely satisfied with the in air usage. I just use rudder control to taxi, unless I need to make a very sharp turn. In that case, I will use the brakes and unlock the tail wheel if I really need to.

This makes me feel like Rudel is just trolling us since the picture you found is pretty much exact, yet it doesn't match the RL version! :doh: :lol: I'll bet it's a simplification of the real design, so we aren't going to be able to find an exact match.

Looks like you nailed it! Where'd you find that picture?

I'm not too worried about flying, I've always liked rollercoasters a lot. I didn't know you need recommendation letters for OTS. So they are more community based recommendations that are needed? I'm closer to underweight than overweight :D, I'm working on it. Final goal? Hmm, I don't know yet how long I'd want to be in the service. Afterwards I'd probably try to use my engineering degree to do something technical in the aeronautical field. I kind of assumed that about recruiters, lol. Thanks for the response.

Thanks xgibbousx, that's very reassuring. If he can do it in that way, I think I won't have that much trouble. I don't have any flight time yet, but I should have some by the time I'm out of school. I wonder how much flight time I would need for it to look good on an application, without being to much overkill? I don't have the money for hundreds and hundreds of hours...

Lately, my flying times have been all over the place. I do see that trend somewhat, but I personally haven't seen any huge Allied numbers in a while.

Well, I'm almost finished with my Junior year of college so I'm too old for that, but I hope to go through OTS after I've graduated. 8)