Jump to content

MAD-MM

Members
  • Posts

    1237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by MAD-MM

  1. Auf die Gefahr hin das ich mit meinem halb Wissen gleich erschossen werde, aber im meine der TARPS Pod wurde im lauf der Jahre auch immer weiter verbessert. Von komplett analogem Pod wo die Bilder nach der Landung zeitraubend ausgewertet wurden, bis zur digitalen Live Übertragung wenn ich mich recht erinnere. Was den Prozess der Auswertung wahrscheinlich auch deutlich beschleunigt hat.
  2. MAD-MM

    Huey

    Bin seit langer Zeit mal wieder online Huey geflogen am WE, und ja Höhenmesser lässt sich nicht mehr verstellen. Hab's nur mit der Maus probiert vielleicht geht die Tastenbelegung noch für das QNH Fenster, aber bis jetzt nicht getestet.
  3. Hallo Purzel, Meinem beschränkten IT Wissen als Grundlage, aber DCS Track is keine gespeicherte Aufnahme, sondern es speichert deine Inputs ab (Joystick,Ansicht,TrackIr) während des Fluges ab und gibt dementsprechend wieder was du geflogen bist. Selbst wenn das Skript funktioniert wäre es irgendwie ein immenser Aufwand zu sagen bei Input xyz schalte F5 z.b. Dan weiß die Kamera aber immer noch nicht wo sie genau hinschauen soll und Kamera ansichten sind doch sehr dynamisch wo sich das gewünschte Objekt befindet das du sehen willst.
  4. Is there Reason why you done this? Think that was the only thing without complains..joke aside old Format was way better
  5. Yes you are right...MI-8 doesnt have this so think MI-24 also dont have the Option for magvar setting..same System Would assume thats good old Hand Operation befor the Fligt, DISS have proberly mutch more drift then INS, thats why the Gunner would proberbaly still doing doing dead Reckoning in the FLight. Would assume when you doing it right without F-10 Map you probably first have to calculate magnetic variation from your true Heading to get a proper Curse in your DISS. PS: on the Right Knee Panel is the Control Panel for the DISS-15 same as in the MI-8 only grapic output with the MAP.
  6. The System is not releated to magnetic Heading, Map with true North DISS-15 is measuring the Speed and Drift by the Doppler Radar System trough Frequenzy changes. Antennas are for example the Box under the Tail Boom in the MI-8. Same System only the visual output is different.
  7. Hope spotting will some kind of realistic for the AI, for example a Tank sit's in a camoflage Forrest and u see for only 2% for Tank shining trough the Forrest. For Human it would be unlikley to spot this Thread, and hopefully the AI will not immedatly spot something because Line of Sight...
  8. What kind of Klimov Engines are used for the MI-24? Seem's first Generation A,B are Powered by TW3-117 "A". They upgraded the Engines for better High and Hot cabaility during Afghanistan War to TW3-117 "W". Did the TW3-113 WM Engines found there way in the MI-24P or what kind of can we expect?
  9. Muss sagen der Camaro schaut schon verdammt gut aus, fast ein bisschen neidisch..
  10. The disadvantages from the MI-24 Yak Chin Gun was realy showing up in service in Afghanistan i assume. Soviet Forces showed up till the end of 1979. Second there was not Gun that was fitting at this time to the MI-24, P-Version Gun is a extend Version from the Su-25 adapted for the MI-24. There some changes trough the Afghan war under the Hood, new high and Hot Klimov Turbine Engines for the V and P Version
  11. Klingt am Anfang komisch, aber eigentlich gar nichts. Waffen scharf machen (Aim 54), warten bis im Radar die Ziele zum Blinken anfangen, und dan die Raketen abfeuern. Ziele werden dan nacheinander beschossen.
  12. Bist du sich das du deine Raketen im TWS Modus feuerst? Weil wen du Jester anweist ein Ziel aufzuschalten, ist es nur noch im STT Singel Track Modus und greift nur das Ziel an das von dir zugewiesen ist. TWS schaltet er nur im Radar automatische die Ziele auf die dan Blinken nach Gefährlickeit.
  13. Bulba did you know the MI-24 was equipped with the R-60"M" later one, or was this even Possible? R-60M had now nitrous cooled Seeker, should be consider more effectiv then the non cooled Variant tested by TurkVO. Is there visual difference between R-60 and R-60M? R-60 old Seeker? R-60M new Seeker?
  14. Have seen this Bombsight called OPB in a MI-8 of the NVA, but aparrently it is not realy small Device, borrowed from a WW2 Bomber. Are you sure they ever fitted this in a cramped MI-24? Think most of the Time they dropped the Iron Bombs by Eyeballing.
  15. Think there is no other Designation, think it is simple a Option by Customer who recived the MI-24. Also this not a huge lose compare to the SPO-10 in Helicopter. Even when you look the MI-24 P in Syria they still miss the SPO-15 Fairings. But so far could not find any Russian MI-24 with this Fairings, could also not find any reliable Source about this but seem's the russian didnt need it. same story Ka-50
  16. Would not go so far... The Antenna Fairings on the Pictures from Pepin are only needed for the SPO-15, think i read somewhere in the Russian Thread the DCS MI-24 will equipped with the more cheaper SPO-10 what the Russian MI-24 used in Service.. Edit: Grodlund was faster
  17. So far i read out of the many Post's, only the export Version's of the MI-24 use the SPO-15.
  18. Oh very nice...Hind is finally Incoming.:thumbup:
  19. Mit Mach 0.9 waren beide in der transsonischen Strömung, bei der F-18 Mirage hab ich keine Ahnung wie genau die Geschwindigkeit ausgelesen nur Analog über Pito, oder Digital?. (F-18 GPS?) Das vielleicht der auschlaggebende Einfluss auf die Unterschiedlichen Geschwindigkeiten?
  20. After seen the video from Syria Map whith the short of the what i belive is new 3D Model of the MI-24 it is complete without Lipa infared Jammer. On the MI-8 it is there but only static without Function. From what i read it was only effective against first Generation Manpads Redeye for example. DCS consits only newer MANPADS, so this have not realy a use currently. But in the longer run for Afghanistan Map would be not more usefull to make old MANPADS then completly remove the Lipa?
  21. I tryed the Campaign, was only flying the First Mission so far, but like the Style of the Campaign thx. In the first mission with the old Carrier, after i crossed the last WP (WP1) was not able to use Tacan back to the Carrier, it is not showing anything 76X for the Stennis on the last leg back to the Carrier.
  22. Have now same issue since last Patches for the Tomcat 2 Months ago probably, same thing with the MIG-15 since release.. Currently the only two Planes with that lagg Issue...have two FFB Sidewinder Sticks, both the same...
  23. And no evidence it enough reasonable to put a since fiction weapon under the MI-24 P Hind? Back to your nice Logic Diagramm, why the send the MI-24 P in to service with R60 Weapons that block a complete weapon station for ground Weapons, meanwhile the could hang the well adopted Igla. Mi-24 P was allready in Production when the first man portable IGLA arrived, on military Equipment it is not plug in hope it will work. Need considerable testing adope Hardware such as Pylons and Software to such things. Mission design is fare more Intressting, to go with this wad you had not any fanci stuff that could might be Happen.
  24. How did you come to this conclusion, apart from your personal Expirience Phil?
×
×
  • Create New...