Vitormouraa

Yep! Also, take a look at your Interstage turbine temperature gauge, you're overheating the engine by a large margin. The maximum ITT is 860°C (on take off for 5 minutes), your ITT was 974°C, maximum continuous ITT is 795°C, which corresponds to an even lower airspeed.

Nobody is complaining... :doh:

We have a difference of 1,07 kN of thrust from the L-39. The difference isn't that great. And the specific fuel consumption of the Garret and AI-25TL is the same! So nope! Even if that was true it wouldn't explain why the C-101 is so slow compared to the Albatros. Obviously, they are not the same airframe, the aerodynamic system is different, but I was surprised by how slow the C-101 is compared to the Albatros which has almost the same engine in terms of thrust.

Happy holidays!

Historical realism? I don't think so.

Scared? :)

Very nice FM indeed. Systems are very well made, the cockpit is gorgeous. I love the lighting, it' very unique. But I was surprised by how slow the C-101 is, kind of a trivial question, but is that really the case? In terms of thrust at least, it's similar to the L-39. Well done, Vibora and team! Looking forward to seeing more modules being developed by AvioDev.

Very nice! Are you planning on doing more of those videos you used to do back when NTTR was being released? With the webcam and all that? Seriously, I enjoyed those live streams!

Yep. MAPs are the same for now, I guess.

Nope. Initially, the Hawg had the 65E capability, but it was removed because the DoD or ANG (can't remember which one) requested ED to remove the AGM-65E from the DCS: A-10C.

Yes, I checked the manual, the minimum CORE RPM for the -220 engines is indeed between 60-73% N2/Ng, as mvsgas said. So if it's below that it's a bug. Minimum CORE RPM is a function of temperature on the ground, in flight at transonic speeds and above, it's a function of Mach number.

Exactly. Though the trailer is amazing, it's sad that they forgot about the Hawg. But I'm pretty sure ED will do a special trailer for it! ED will never forget about its greatest module ever.

I'm pretty sure the aircraft is going to require some trimming after bending a wing. It's not going to fly straight or the same after that. So yes, overstressing the aircraft could result in some very interesting behaviours. I expect this to be quite difficult to model, ripping off the wing being the most simple one to model.

If you aren't an A2A guy, get the Sabre! But they are both AMAZING modules!

A few improvements such as textures, lighting, no pylons option, fixes, and I'm happy! But Suite 7B would be a dream.

Yes. Especially the crew.

They are both very nice. But I prefer the new one. Same thing with the new Stang pit.

I'm very excited about this update. Can't wait!

It can carry up to 10 bombs using the BRU-33 VER, LDGP bombs and LGBs, as for the JDAMs, we would need the BRU-55, which is the 'smart rack' that is capable of employing JDAMs. It's unclear if we will have it or not.

Can't wait for the next update! So many good news.

Damn guys, F-14's looking terrific!

That's kind of a cheat, using the AI, which knows where everyone is at all times to spot targets. That's easy :)

I guess it's around 2850, 2700 RPM. Just guessing though... That's a great question.

More horsepower (work rate) doesn't necessarily mean a higher top speed. With a higher RPM, you have more induced drag. I have tested this myself, all I could see is a difference of 2, 3 km/h. So his argument is valid. A few km/h isn't going to save your life most of the time, but running a cooler engine sometimes will.

Nice! Saw some of your videos on FB doing test flights for Embraer, are you still working for them as a test pilot? A pic of that glass cockpit would be cool! :D