Jump to content

Kappa

Members
  • Posts

    386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Kappa

  1. Just to avoid not needed bog reports, can you tell us what is this bug?
  2. Don't forget A2G radar mode. A2A is only one part of this cake
  3. Are you guys using DCS Stable? I don't see this problem in Open Beta since a lot of time...
  4. Yeh, Harrier is now almost done and it seems they are doing it right. Keep going guys
  5. It could be false inputs due undervoltage... Had that problem with a Logitech X-56... Resolved it by using a powered usb hub
  6. Usually this kind of mod should be placed into C:\Users\YourName\Saved Games\DCS.openbeta\Mods\tech
  7. @horstweihrauch Did you try reading the README file?
  8. Other conditions was true, but I thought A/G was required, right?
  9. Not sure but funny In deeds BAW can be adgusted according the aircraft configuration that may change due removal of structures and systems
  10. Kappa

    Harrier's JDAM

    I also recall that bomb heading was realative, don't remember how i know. Anyway bomb heading is ok, the strange thing is the vertical angle that sometimes is fine and sometimes you see the bomb overfly the target and then point down at 90 degreees... In my first post i forgot to specify that i find JDAM inaccurate only in TOO mode, if I input coordinatest (UTM) into CAS page they are a sniper round. My guess is that aiming with TGP is subject to error, but i can't be sure because i always try to aim to the ground where the target is but the result can change..
  11. Kappa

    VREST ALTM

    Hello, I have to resolve a doubt and maybe you can help me. On the VREST page, the ALTM parameter refers to the barometric pressure measured at the take-off / landing point, the QFE. Quite right?
  12. Yesterday i switched to NAV mode and the laser was still armed
  13. Hahhaha no airfield no ground crew! That's great!
  14. Kappa

    Harrier's JDAM

    Hi everyone, I was wondering if the harrier's JDAMs are modeled correctly or if there are any known bugs. I tried to use both 38 and 54 (without laser illumination) and both were not very accurate, sometimes they hit the target with a direct hit, other times they miss 10 meters or more ... I do not understand if the mistake is mine, if it is normal that they are so inaccurate or if they are bugged ... In addition to the imprecision I also notice a very strange flight path that often brings the bomb above the target (sometimes beyond it), shouldn't it hit at an angle of about 45 °? Thanks
  15. Fatnastic! This will be very usefull! Thanks for your reply
  16. well done @gulredrel. Thanks!
  17. It would be great, do Razbam know about this bug? Is it confirmed that has been fixed and we just need to wait for an update?
  18. Uhmmmm.... Razbam??? What have you done with Hubble???? https://www.esa.int/Enabling_Support/Operations/Hubble_enters_safe_mode
  19. haha we burned another community manager
  20. Elmo? Is he still here? I haven't read any messages from him on this forum for at least a month now...
  21. Had some more time to test it... It persist also for me
  22. AFAIK it is not possible.
  23. Unfortunately no, I'm not sure
  24. After updating the AMD drivers to the latest version I no longer encountered the problem. Will report if it the problem occurs again.
×
×
  • Create New...