Jump to content

amalahama

Members
  • Posts

    1812
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by amalahama

  1. FLIR projection on the HUD could be a tad more realistic (hard borders). Also Maverick and ARBS image resolution are irrealistically sharp, especially taking into account that both produce analog video feed
  2. Not a radar expert but it looks like a bug to me. It makes more sense that the filter works with relative speeds since it's the direct info that the Doppler shift provides.
  3. I'm quite sure ASL line should do a lead for wind correction, not that sure about the moving target compensation though. So ASL line is not fully fixed afterall?
  4. Question, is it wind corrected? In the presence of wind, the ASL should NOT cross the target box, otherwise the (dumb) bomb will never hit the target
  5. Does anybody know whether we will see FM updates on the A-10C's JDAM when fully implemented in the Hornet? The FM is pretty unrealistic right now
  6. Datalinking?
  7. Nothing to add sir
  8. No, it doesn't work like that
  9. Yes, high speed-high altitude performances are weird. HB should have a look at it
  10. Well before the HMD, I'd rather prefer realistic JDAM mechanics and complete SAL, plus the laser Maverick. These features were present in early operational suites but are beyond the scope of the testing Suite 3
  11. An Intruder is OK but it would be even better if they keep following the cat route and go for a D
  12. Yeah we've been told that 6 months ago, and for the time being, silent, nothing, nada.
  13. Hi I think the cross is still misplaced...
  14. Good catch! It looks indeed more useful and logical to me
  15. It would be nice if they add working AC/DC gauges as well
  16. I agree! None STS sims out there are perfect, but I find them terribly fun because of the variety of missions and procedures. Even a nominal, STS-1 like mission is extremely challenging.
  17. A space shuttle simulator would have a warm welcome, though. There are a couple of GPL projects but the task is daunting for an amateur developer - and even so they are backed by quite a bunch of strong supporters.
  18. That's good news! Looking forward to it.
  19. It's not a bug. It's a wrongly implemented feature. I don't know how a track will help...
  20. After the Tomcat another Tomcat... The D!
  21. Sorry you didn't convince me. I still prefer The D (I'm talking about tomcats of course!) as next HB module. Regards
  22. Don't bet on it. Apparently Zeus stated that is extremely difficult to draw a dashed line on the HUD...
  23. Might it become the best FM of all time? Unleash the Kraken and let us decide! :)
  24. Looking at the first picture in #142, I can see that new radar 2.0 representation is indeed more correct; you have some hills obscuring the radar LOS that are not shown in the old version. Just pay attention to the right side, there are hills whose radar Shadow is not existing in 1.5.7. The problem is that hills' shadows and water bodies share same color which makes the picture somewhat confusing, but it's correct; water absorbs almost all radar energy so no return is detected.
×
×
  • Create New...