Jump to content

amalahama

Members
  • Posts

    1813
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by amalahama

  1. Well before the HMD, I'd rather prefer realistic JDAM mechanics and complete SAL, plus the laser Maverick. These features were present in early operational suites but are beyond the scope of the testing Suite 3
  2. An Intruder is OK but it would be even better if they keep following the cat route and go for a D
  3. Yeah we've been told that 6 months ago, and for the time being, silent, nothing, nada.
  4. Hi I think the cross is still misplaced...
  5. Good catch! It looks indeed more useful and logical to me
  6. It would be nice if they add working AC/DC gauges as well
  7. I agree! None STS sims out there are perfect, but I find them terribly fun because of the variety of missions and procedures. Even a nominal, STS-1 like mission is extremely challenging.
  8. A space shuttle simulator would have a warm welcome, though. There are a couple of GPL projects but the task is daunting for an amateur developer - and even so they are backed by quite a bunch of strong supporters.
  9. That's good news! Looking forward to it.
  10. After the Tomcat another Tomcat... The D!
  11. Sorry you didn't convince me. I still prefer The D (I'm talking about tomcats of course!) as next HB module. Regards
  12. Might it become the best FM of all time? Unleash the Kraken and let us decide! :)
  13. Looking at the first picture in #142, I can see that new radar 2.0 representation is indeed more correct; you have some hills obscuring the radar LOS that are not shown in the old version. Just pay attention to the right side, there are hills whose radar Shadow is not existing in 1.5.7. The problem is that hills' shadows and water bodies share same color which makes the picture somewhat confusing, but it's correct; water absorbs almost all radar energy so no return is detected.
  14. I find in general the weapon employment section quite confusing. I think they should rewrite it with practical examples. Maybe the community could contribute? I can for sure
  15. Call it "limitation" better
  16. Hi! Is the manual frozen already or are there fixes/ new stuff coming? I'm waiting for printing it
  17. Thank you very much heatblur! I tested it yesterday and I'm really pleased with the results, now it behaves how it should! Impact on fps is minimal, if any. I know praise and encourage are important for you, so I wanted to spend some minutes to leave my positive feedback! :)
  18. Honestly, I would rather go for a F-14D as a new module and leave the -B as it is. We should be grateful to HB to provide us with 2 versions for free already! :)
  19. UBER COOL! I'm a bit worried about the performance impact though, I'm looking forward to checking myself.
  20. OMG !!!! I really hope it sneaks out in the next update!
  21. Not really answering my question but I will take it as a "Maybe" :D
  22. Hi, Does Maverick lock onto real white/black points or are still automatically locking onto real targets only (and see through grass etc)? Also, in real MAV videos, the locking process is "smooth" - the cross doesn't immediately snap on the target but moves around searching first with some "fluidity". It'd be a nice touch if it's implemented in the future.
  23. I'm actually really excited about the MIDS/LINK 16, it's going to be a revolution! And curious to see how AI will handle it too.
×
×
  • Create New...